View clinical trials related to AAA.
Filter by:Prospective, randomized, multi-center study designed to evaluate the outcomes of commercially available contemporary EVAR in a real-world population. Patients will be randomized into two device cohorts and compared across the primary endpoints. Patients will be followed procedurally to discharge, at 1, 6, 12 months and annually through to 5 years (total follow-up commitment).
Background: A sub-study of the AARDVARK (Aortic Aneurysmal Regression of Dilation: Value of ACE-Inhibition on RisK) trial indicated a statistically significant association between central blood pressure (BP) variability and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth. The role of anti-hypertensive adherence has not been explored in the context of AAA growth. Objective: To confirm whether higher central BP variability is associated with higher AAA growth rates and to examine the effect of medication adherence on AAA growth rates in a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Methods: Up to 175 patients will be recruited over ten months from two sites with standardised quality control of AAA, BP and antihypertensive non-adherence measurement. Patients (>55 years), with AAAs ≥3cm in diameter (including AAA ≥5.5cm, not proceeding to surgery) will be recruited and undergo AAA ultrasound (US), BP (peripheral and central) and antihypertensive non-adherence measurements every four months (+/- one month) for 24 months. Ambulatory BP variability data will be collected. Data on medication adherence and beliefs around medications will be collected with validated questionnaires. Analysis: Primarily, the relationship between central diastolic BP visit-to-visit variability and AAA growth (estimated by multilevel modelling) based on US measurements and secondarily the relationship between central diastolic BP variability and time taken to reach the threshold for AAA repair (5.5 cm) or rupture.
This is a first in human study to evaluate the safety and clinical utility of an investigational medical device called the Nectero EAST System to treat Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms or AAA.
Prospective, randomized, multi-center study designed to evaluate the outcomes of commercially available contemporary EVAR in a real-world population. Patients will be randomized into two device cohorts and compared across the primary endpoints. Patients will be followed procedurally to discharge, at 1, 6, 12 months and annually through to 5 years (total follow-up commitment).
The incidence of delirium following open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery is significant, with incidence rates ranging from 12 to 33%. The occurrence of delirium on the surgical ward after intensive care unit (ICU) dismissal in AAA patients remains unclear. Differences in outcomes between a delirium on the ICU and a delirium on the surgical ward have not been previously investigated. Delirium is a frequent complication in patients who underwent open AAA surgery. This study demonstrated that patients on the surgical ward remain at risk for developing a delirium after ICU dismissal. Physicians should therefore maintain a high level of awareness for delirium in AAA patients who return to the surgical ward after ICU dismissal. This simultaneously emphasises the necessity of delirium preventive measures and early recognition on the surgical ward in order to improve clinical outcomes.
The incidence of isolated common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms is low, but in combination with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) they are found in approximately 20-40% of cases. Basically, two different endovascular strategies can be applied to treat a CIA aneurysm with, including 1. the coverage and 2. the preservation of blood flow to the internal iliac artery (IIA). Coil and coverage of the IIA is related to ischemic complications, including buttock claudication, erectile dysfunction and the more severe spinal and colonic ischemia. Iliac branched devices (IBD) have been developed to exclude CIA aneurysms preserving the IIA and currently three alternatives are on the market. Clinical results of these devices are promising but loss of patency is not uncommon. The major difference between the two devices is the IIA component. The Cook IBD uses a -non-dedicated IIA component, while in the GORE® EXCLUDER® Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (Gore IBE device) a dedicated self expanding stent is used. Stresses and forces exerted onto the endograft by aortic pulsatility may have an effect on the durability and functioning of the endograft. Intermittent hinchpoints could also have an effect on stent integrity and stenosis. By evaluating endograft movement during the cardiac cycle (ECG-gated CTA) it is possible to assess the stress and force exerted onto the endograft. This might help gain insight into mechanisms underlying potential endograft failure, and aid procedural planning and the development of future devices with long-term durability. The choice for device is not part of this study.
An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a dilation of the aorta, defined as an aortic diameter of ≥3cm. It is a significant cause of death internationally and in England each year causes c.4,000 deaths with 8,000 patients undergoing preventative surgery. AAA are often asymptomatic and there is a latent period between development and rupture. This represents an opportunity to screen by ultrasound which has been shown in trials to reduce AAA related mortality by half. In England this evidence is based on a randomised trial data from the late nineties, however, since these data were published the number of men identified with AAA has fallen to a current prevalence of just over 1%. Furthermore, similarly designed randomised trials in Western Australia demonstrated no meaningful differences in AAA or cardiovascular deaths. The first aim of our research is to follow men who have been screened for AAA in England in order to establish the medium (5 years) and long term (10+ years) impact of AAA screening on the risk of a AAA, cardiovascular and all-cause morbidity/mortality in a non-trial setting. Men with sub-aneurysms will be examined (Aorta=2.5-2.9cm) as several studies suggest this group is at risk of late rupture. The role of patient pathways to improve uptake of the screening programme will be examined. Current data suggests that the most 'deprived' men in England are the least likely to turn up for screening but the most likely to have an abdominal aneurysm. Outcomes in this group will be analysed including the benefit of a new patient pathway to improve uptake nationally. Lastly, several large studies have demonstrated that a larger aortic diameter may be associated with cardiovascular risk. The addition of aortic diameter to current risk prediction models could improve the accuracy of these models and will be examined.
This study will assess the safety and efficacy of systemic (IV) administration of escalating doses of allogeneic MSCs in modulating immune cell phenotypes and suppressing aortic inflammation in patients with small AAA. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to receive mesenchymal stromal cells (1 million or 3 million MSC/kg) intra-venously or placebo (Plasmalyte A).
In this study, patients will be observed who receive an E-liac Stent Graft for treatment of isolated iliac aneurysms or an E-liac Stent Graft in combination with one of the following AAA stent grafts: E-tegra Stent Graft, Endurant AAA Stent Graft, Zenith AAA Endovascular Graft, Gore Excluder AAA Endoprosthesis for treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms. Objectives of this post-market registry are: Primary: To prevent the risk of rupture and death by the treatment of common iliac aneurysm with an iliac branched stent graft (E-liac, JOTEC) Secondary: Evaluation of safety and feasibility of the E-liac Stent Graft System used in endovascular treatment of uni- or bilateral aorto-iliac or iliac aneurysm.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical and technical success as well as safety and feasibility of the E-tegra Stent Graft System used in endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysm.