View clinical trials related to Anticoagulant Adverse Reaction.
Filter by:Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has become a frequent addition to oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation who undergo cardiac surgery. The procedure significantly reduces the risk of stroke and systemic embolism, which may render anticoagulation unnecessary or even harmful when considering the associated increased risk of bleeding. A clinical trial to address the need for anticoagulation after LAA closure is needed. The ATLAAC trial will enroll 1220 patients with atrial fibrillation who have previously undergone surgical LAA closure. Patients will undergo a cardiac CT-scan to determine if LAA closure was successful and patients with successful closure will be randomized to continue or discontinue anticoagulation. The trial will assess the risk of ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial embolism, and major bleeding during the randomized intervention
In this clinical trial, Rivaroxaban of standard dose (20mg) and reduced dose (15mg) will be administeted in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients without severe renal dysfunction. It is a randomized, open-label, and phase 4 clinical trial to compare and evaluate efficacy and safety of Rivaroxaban. After obtaining informed consent to participate in this trial, screening is performed (Screening visit). Screening includes baseline 12-lead electrocardiography and laboratory tests to exclude severe end-organ dysfunction (such as renal dysfunction, liver dysfunction, or anemia). Baseline visits are available on the same day. After screening, subjects eligible for the trial will be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to Group 1 (15 mg of Rivaroxaban) or Group 2 (20 mg of Rivaroxaban) (Baseline visit). The study drug (Rivaroxaban 15mg or 20mg daily) will be administered for 12 months. During study period, a total of six visits (3,6,9,12 months) will be made, and follow-up test and outcome measurement will be done in each visit.
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are recommended over warfarin in preventing stroke and thromboembolism among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in several guidelines. To evaluate the pharmacological effects of NOACs, directly measuring the concentration is the most arbitrary way since the correlation between concentration and common coagulation tests are not reliable. Our previous investigation reported under the fixed dose regimen, dabigatran exposure increased in elderly, renal impairments and patients with multiple co-morbid conditions. Our data also showed difference in NOACs exposure in Asians. For example, patients under rivaroxaban, in comparison to apxiaban, were more likely to have lower than expected range drug level. Furthermore, the NOACs concentration also affected by the prescription pattern of physicians (non-compliant to labeled dose) and patients' behavior (poor medication adherence). The relationship between NOACs exposure and safety has been elucidated in large-scale clinical trials. As the NOACs level increased, the risk for bleeding increased, too. Nevertheless, no additional protection was noted with increased NOACs levels. In post marketing surveillance, bleeding and thrombotic events have been reported. Investigating the NOACs level among these patients helps evaluating the residual drug in the body, which could be a reference for clinical decision in emergent situation. Specific purpose: Investigate the correlation between NOACs concentration upon the arrival of emergency department (ED) and important clinical outcomes including systemic thromboembolism, and major bleeding. Direction for investigation: 1. Prospectively record the NOACs concentration among AF patients under NOACs therapy and suffered from ischemic stroke (IS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and other major bleeding. 2. Investigate the correlation between NOACs concentration upon ED arrival and thromboembolic or bleeding events. 3. Propose a therapeutic range for NOACs, in order to provide a guide for important decision in acute setting.
The adherence project aims to understand adherence rates and barriers to Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and statins and improve awareness of healthcare professionals on adherence across Leeds. During the first component of the project, the investigation of rates of non-adherence was classed as service evaluation. The second component of this project, which this IRAS application refers to, will look into patient perspectives and barriers to adherence. Currently, such information is not routinely collected and only requested as part of shorter or longer consultations depending on a pre-defined clinical agenda and with little attention to adherence. Two specific questionnaires have been designed and integrated within the primary care medical records systems. Following invitation for target patients on DOACs and/or statins to respond anonymously, responses to the questionnaire(s) will be stored in their medical records. Data will then be extracted from the two systems [SystmOne and Egton Medical Information Systems (EMIS)] using unique system identifiers, that will be pseudonymised at the time of extraction. All patient pseudonymised information (including medical records system identifiers and responses to the questionnaire) will be extracted by the LTHT Researcher-Pharmacist following access provided by each participating General Practitioner (GP) Practice, based on searches built centrally by the Data Quality Team of the Leeds Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG). Apart from the dissemination of findings based on the questionnaire, a training package for health professionals will be designed and delivered. The aim of the training is to combine and disseminate all findings of the project, raise awareness on real-world non-adherence prevalence and the common barriers to adherence, demonstrate the usefulness of routine adherence estimation and suggest tools to address non-adherence in daily practice. The objectives of this training will also consider the training needs of healthcare professionals locally, as per the healthcare professionals survey that has been designed and circulated.
In this bi-directional program of education, training and research activities based on sustainable development goals aim is to develop cardiac surgery service in Ethiopia. The aim is to evaluate the short and long-term outcome of cardiac surgery for rheumatic heart disease in a low-income country compared to individuals not offered cardiac surgery due to limited availability of the service. Second aim is to evaluate the quality of anticoagulant therapy in patients after cardiac surgery for rheumatic heart disease in a low-income country .
The anticoagulants have been developed with new generation for FDA-approved indications including treatment and prevention of venous, pulmonary, and systemic thromboembolism. While the prescription of new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) has increasingly and largely replaced warfarin in accordance of better efficacy and safety, there are still adverse effects, including incidental minor and major bleeding, and inefficacy in thrombosis prevention. The overarching goal of this study is to develop a Pharmacogenomics Platform that is specifically designed for NOACs, in order to optimize and personalize the prescription and to facilitate the precision medicine.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a very common pathology of the aging man with an incidence that rises from 40% in men aged 50 to 60 years to 90% in men over 80 years. Studies such as the MTOPS (the Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms) study show that more than half of the patients recruited had an aggravation of their disease over time either by an increase in symptoms or by the appearance of complications such as acute retention of urine. For benign symptomatic prostate hypertrophy, apart from any complication, first-line treatment is now a medical treatment. For patients who respond poorly to medical treatment or who have complications related to benign prostatic hypertrophy, the treatment becomes surgical. The reference treatment is endoscopic prostate resection (TURP). It is mainly to improve the safety of hemostasis in patients older and older and at significant surgical risk that new "minimally invasive" surgical techniques have emerged. Thus, lasers have been developed and are currently used as an alternative to the TURP. Used in clinical practice since 2000, prostatic photosensitive vaporization (PVP) relies on the absorption of a 532nm (green) wavelength laser beam by the oxyhemoglobin contained in richly vascularized prostate tissue. Given the aging of the population, more and more patients are being treated with oral anticoagulants (Anti Vitamin K (AVK) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)). Today there are about 1.4 million people on oral anticoagulants, 40% of whom are over 80 years of age. The peri-operative management of the AVK is currently based on the recommendations published by the FHA (French Health Authority) in 2008. Concerning the perioperative management of DOACs, the perioperative haemostasis interest group (GIHP) made proposals updated in September 2015. Numerous studies published in the literature have concluded the feasibility of prostate removal surgery by PVP with greenlight laser without relay (or interruption) of AVK or DOACs because of the properties of hemostasis. But the levels of evidence for these studies remain low. No study has focused on rigorously assessing the perioperative hemorrhagic risk associated with OAC therapy in patients eligible for PVP, and this is the originality of this study. This study is a multicenter prospective randomized study whose objective is to show that the PVP performed in patients with OAC is not associated with an increase in perioperative hemorrhagic risk.