View clinical trials related to Antibiotic Side Effect.
Filter by:Diabetic foot problems, especially infections (DFI), require multiple resources including iterative surgeries and amputations, long-lasting antibiotic therapies, education, off-loading and eventually revascularization and appropriate foot-ware. Treatment is complicated, multidisciplinary, and marked with a high risk of recurrences. This is a retrospective and prospective cohort with side studies of pathologies and academic research questions that cannot be separated from each other. The investigators establish a retro-and prospective cohort of diabetic foot problems (ambulatory and hospitalized patients) and perform side studies to reduce the incidence of complications, and to reduce recurrences of DFI, cost and adverse events related to therapies. Cohort: Prospective and retrospective cohort of all diabetic foot problems with emphasis on surgical and infectious variables. Trial 1 (Randomized trial on residual infection after amputation): Determination of the level of amputation per MRI followed by a randomization concerning the duration of post-amputation systemic antibiotic therapy, if there is residual bone infection. Trial 2 (Randomized trial on infection without amputation): Determination of the duration of systemic antibiotic therapy in diabetic foot infections without Amputation of the infection.
In this study, patients who have had previous endoscopic sinus surgery and present with an acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis will be offered endoscopic-guided, culture-directed antibiotic therapy. They will then be randomized to receive oral or intranasal topical antibiotics. Both of these are considered standard of care, but there is some limited data suggesting superiority of topical antibiotics especially if guided by culture and in patients who have undergone previous surgery. However, a study that directly compares the two has not been published. Modified Lund-Kennedy endoscopic finding scores and subjective SNOT-22 questionnaires will be collected before and at 3-4 weeks after treatment. Medication-related sided effects will be noted and analyzed. After 6-8 month follow-up, we will analyze the rate of recurrence of exacerbations, need for further antibiotics, need for revision surgery, and SNOT-22 scores based on oral versus topical antibiotic treatment. Our objective is to evaluate both short and long-term response to both oral and topical administration of antibiotics in this patient population in order to determine if either route of administration is superior to the other.
This study will implement a comprehensive outpatient stewardship program targeting a large network of Urgent Care (UC) clinics within Intermountain Helathcare.
Cystectomy with urinary diversion (ileal conduit, orthotopic ileal bladder substitute, continent catheterizable pouch) is the best treatment option for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This intervention is one of the most challenging in urology and has a high rate of postoperative complications including around 30% of postoperative infections. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is widely accepted as a crucial preventive measure to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI). The rationale for PAP is the reduction of the local bacterial load at the site and time of intervention, and therefore a short duration of PAP of 24 to maximal 48 hours is recommended for all clean to clean-contaminated procedures.. Evidence supporting the optimal duration of PAP for radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is lacking. Based on data extrapolated from abdominal surgery, current guidelines recommend short-term PAP (≤24h) for all clean-contaminated procedures including radical cystectomy. However, a recent evaluation revealed a significant inter-hospital variability of PAP and showed that extended use (>48h) was common in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Importantly, this study also demonstrated that longer duration of PAP incurred higher costs and was associated with an increased rate of C. difficile colitis. A small, prospective, non-randomized study showed equal efficacy of short-term PAP in preventing postoperative infections in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with ileum conduit compared to extended PAP. Nonetheless, larger randomized clinical trials supporting these findings are lacking. The unwarranted extended use of antibiotics is a major concern as exposure to antibiotics is a driving force for the development of (multi-) resistant bacteria and will lead to an increasing number of difficult-to-treat infections. This has been recognized on both national and international levels and is addressed within antimicrobial stewardship frameworks. This study will compare current practice (>48h PAP, "extended PAP") with the guideline recommended approach (24h PAP, "short term PAP") in a single-centre, prospective, randomised clinical non-inferiority trial. The primary outcome is the rate of SSI within 90 days post surgery. The aim of the study is to generate currently lacking evidence allowing for an optimised PAP strategy in a challenging surgical setting.
The investigators would like to examine the extent of gut microbiome rehabilitation in healthy people after the consumption of antibiotics. Outcomes of probiotic treatment versus bacteriotherapy will be compared.
The investigators propose a prospective randomized control trial testing the hypothesis that routine topical antibiotic prophylaxis does not significantly reduce the rate of infection after eyelid surgery.
Cotrimoxazole preventive therapy (CPT) is recommended for prevention of morbidity and mortality due to Pneumocystis pneumonia and other infections in HIV positive patients with low immunity. Common clinical practice is to start CPT in any patient with CD4 counts below 200/µL, and, conversely, to stop CPT when immunity has been restored by antiretroviral treatment to CD4 counts above 200/µL or when viral suppression has been documented for 3 months. However, the latest WHO guidelines widely expands the indication for CPT by advocating for settings with high prevalence of malaria and bacterial infections, that all patients with HIV start CPT regardless of CD4 counts and clinical stage. Furthermore, WHO recommends these patients to continue CPT indefinitely regardless of evidence of immune restoration (The recommendation is for settings with high prevalence of malaria and bacterial infections, not for high-income countries). There is limited scientific evidence to recommend prolonged CPT, as studies have shown it is associated with modestly reduced morbidity due to pneumonia, meningitis and malaria, but no corresponding reduction in mortality. The impact of such a large increase in antibiotic use on the emergence of antimicrobial resistance has not been thoroughly considered. Our previous studies in Tanzania showed that multidrug-resistant bacteria frequently cause bloodstream infections with resultant very high case-fatality rates. As genes encoding for multiple antibiotic resistance traits are transferred by plasmids together with resistance towards cotrimoxazole, prolonged CPT will likely favor the selection of carriage of multidrug-resistant gut bacteria. The proposed randomized clinical trial is designed to assess whether prolonged CPT in HIV-positive patients results in increased fecal carriage of multi-drug resistant gut microbes or increased nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Secondary endpoints are morbidity (clinical events, hospitalizations) and mortality. Stool specimens, nasal swabs and clinical data will be collected from persons attending voluntary counseling and testing facilities and HIV-clinics in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The study results may have important impact on public health in terms of assisting development of rational recommendations for CPT use, and may help prevent emerging antibiotic resistance.
This cross-disciplinary study will assemble and longitudinally follow a large, diverse birth cohort to determine the relationships between early life antibiotic exposure, microbiome development, growth, antibodies, and immunostimulation.
Antibiotics are lifesaving medicines and generally safe, yet unwanted side effects are common. While destroying illness-causing 'bad' bacteria, antibiotics can upset the protective 'good' bacteria in the body. This research will test if taking a probiotic with prescribed antibiotics will decrease the chance of having bothersome antibiotic-associated side effects.