Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstructions using hamstring grafts can be performed using one or two hamstring grafts, the semitendinosus (ST) tendon only, or both the semitendinosus and gracilis (ST/G) tendon. As most patients strive to return to sport nine months after reconstruction the purpose of this study was to compare the recovery of hamstring muscle strength during these first nine months after reconstruction using the ST or ST/G tendons.


Clinical Trial Description

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniques are developing continuously. Studies have shown that anatomical positioning of the femur tunnel is an important predictor for the clinical outcome. This has led to the development of new reconstruction techniques with a more anatomical placement of the femur tunnel: the anteromedial portal (AMP) ACL reconstruction technique and, more recently, the tape locking screw (TLS) ACL reconstruction technique. Multiple retrospective studies have shown that patients have a better short term clinical outcome when the anteromedial portal (AMP) or the tape locking crew (TLS) reconstruction technique is used. At this moment, the most widely used technique is the AMP (performed in approximately 80% of the ACL reconstructions). The TLS technique is widely used in France and the available literature shows good short-term results. A difference between the AMP and the TLS technique is that the AMP technique uses a double-bundle hamstring graft where the TLS technique uses a single-bundle hamstring graft. The idea is that using a single-bundle hamstring graft causes less hamstring muscle strength deficit. The available literature shows different outcomes of hamstring muscle strength deficit, although, there are no studies found in which the difference in hamstring muscle strength deficit between both techniques directly has been investigated. Objective: The main objective of this study is to compare the hamstring muscle strength deficit after AMP and TLS reconstruction techniques. The primary aim of this study is to investigate if there is a difference in hamstring muscle strength deficit at 60°/s flexion in patients with an ACL rupture (18-60 years) who received a tape locking screw ACL reconstruction versus patients who received an anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction 12 weeks after surgery. The secondary aim of this study is to investigate if there is a difference in muscle strength deficit at 180°/s and 240°/s flexion and extension 12 weeks after surgery and 60°/s, 180°/s and 240°/s flexion and extension 20 weeks after surgery in patients who received a tape locking screw ACL reconstruction versus patients who received an anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
  • Rupture

NCT number NCT05464485
Study type Observational
Source Isala
Contact
Status Completed
Phase
Start date January 1, 2017
Completion date July 1, 2018

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05487768 - Functional Connectivity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction N/A
Recruiting NCT04390035 - BFRT in Adolescents After ACL Reconstruction N/A
Recruiting NCT02740452 - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02555917 - Comparison of Remnant Preserving Versus Remnant Resecting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT00529958 - Comparison of Three Methods for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction N/A
Completed NCT05109871 - Reliability and Validity of Inline Dynamometry Study for Measuring Knee Extensor Torque N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06048874 - FNB in ACL Recon Under SA N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06048848 - FNB in ACL Recon Under GA N/A
Terminated NCT03529552 - Evaluation After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Using the Bioresorbable Interference Screw (SMS): Resorbability, Per- and Post-operative Complications and Articular Functional Recovery. N/A
Completed NCT04285853 - Are Opioids Needed After ACL Reconstruction Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04088227 - Effects of Platelet Rich Plasma Injections on Biomarkers After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03671421 - Number One Overall Graft Pick? Hamstring vs Bone-Patellar-Tendon-Bone vs Quadriceps Tendon N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04953676 - A Clinical Trial of the Round-tunnel and Flat-tunnel Technique of ACL Reconstruction N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04957706 - Diagnostic Study of ACL Rupture With Anterior Drawer Test at 90° of Hip Flexion
Enrolling by invitation NCT03365908 - Pain Management of ACL Reconstruction N/A
Recruiting NCT06030791 - BTB Graft Harvest and Donor Site Morbidity After ACL Reconstruction
Recruiting NCT03950024 - Improvement of Knowledge About the Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition in the Aftermath of Knee Trauma. N/A
Recruiting NCT03229369 - Association of ALL and ACL Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction in High-risk Population: a RCT. N/A
Completed NCT01267435 - Evaluation of Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position After Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Phase 2
Completed NCT05057442 - The Effects of Remnant-Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Proprioception and Functionality