View clinical trials related to Ankle Fractures.
Filter by:Medial malleolus: Operative Or Non-operative (MOON study) Ankle fractures are a common Orthopaedic trauma presentation, accounting for approximately 10% of the workload. There has been debate regarding the significance of the contribution of the medial malleolus to ankle stability. Some deem the lateral malleolus as the key stabiliser. With this anatomically aligned the ankle joint should be stable. Operating on the medial malleolus fracture often requires a second generous skin incision, soft tissue stripping and insertion of metalwork. This carries with it the risk of wound complications, infection and increased operation time. High risk patients including the elderly, diabetics and those with significant swelling following injury are particularly vulnerable. The study will include adult patients (≥16 years) with capacity to consent and complete post-operative questionnaires, presenting to a single Orthopaedic trauma unit. Participants will be randomised to fixation or non-fixation of associated medial malleolus fractures at the same time as fixation of the lateral malleolar fracture to assess if this impacts on validated patient outcomes, failure, operative time and complications over a one-year follow-up. Only one trial has been published, showing no significant difference between failure rates or outcomes, but reduced operative time. Participants will be enrolled into the trial following informed consent. The final decision on whether a participant is eligible can only be made during surgery when the medial malleolus fracture has reduced with no more than 2mm displacement. If this is confirmed the participant will be randomised to receive either fixation or non-fixation of the medial malleolus. Randomisation therefore occurs at the time of surgery. Participants will be reviewed at set post-operative checkpoints, with X-rays and patient reported outcome scores. Trial data will hopefully enable surgeons to make better informed decisions when managing patients with ankle fracture dislocations.
The purpose of this study is to determine if use of new imaging technology termed "3D fluoroscopy" will lead the surgeon to change the position of the fractured bones to a more accurate position.
Perfusion index (PI) measured via a pulse oximeter has been shown to correlate with activation of the sympathetic nervous system, such as by pain stimulation, as a result of involuntary contraction of the arterioles. Thus PI holds potential for use as a tool for "objective pain measurement", although its practical usefulness and dependability as such have not previously been investigated. The investigators aim to explore associations between changes in PI and onset of pain following cessation of regional anaesthesia in alert patients following ankle fracture surgery. Methods: The investigators report an exploratory, observational analysis of prospectively gathered PI data from patients undergoing regional anaesthesia with spinal or peripheral nerve block for ankle fracture surgery as participants of the randomised AnAnkle Trial (EudraCT: 2015-001108-76). PI is measured on an unaffected extremity in approximately 20 consecutive patients already included in the AnAnkle Trial at Herlev University Hospital, evenly distributed between spinal anaesthesia (SA) and peripheral nerve block (PNB). Both anaesthesia forms and pain medication regimes are standardised as part of AnAnkle Trial and participants register pain scores on a 0-10 numeric rating scale every three hours and register the time of cessation of anaesthesia identified by return of sensation to the ankle. Morphine consumption is also registered. The investigators will explore correlations of changes in PI to increases in pain upon cessation of the regional anaesthesia and, secondly, differences in cessation related PI changes with SA versus PNB. Ethics: All participants have already given informed, written consent for use of this data for the AnAnkle Trial. All necessary ethical and legislative approvals have been obtained for initiation of AnAnkle Trial in July 2015.
Post Market clinical outcomes study to collect data on the short - and long-term outcomes for subjects who are undergoing or who have undergone the Subchondroplasty Procedure in the foot and/or ankle in a standard clinical setting. Outcomes to be assessed include pain medication usage, pain, function, activity levels and patient satisfaction.
This single-centre historical control group comparative study will compare outcomes of surgically-treated rotational ankle fractures and the current routine practice of early protected weightbearing and range of motion with immediate unprotected weightbearing as tolerated and range of motion after ankle open reduction and internal fixation.
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a peri-articular multimodal injection for post-operative pain control following operative management of closed, rotational ankle fractures. Enrolled subjects will be randomized to either receive or not receive intra-operative injections in addition to standard opioid analgesic regimens. Patients will be treated with standard of care surgical techniques by the treating orthopaedic surgeon for the patient's specific fracture pattern. The patients randomized into the injection cohort will receive a 25cc intra-operative injection with 200 mg ropivacaine, 0.6 mg epinephrine, 5 mg and morphine into the local superficial and deep peri-incisional tissues while under general anesthesia. Total post-operative opioid consumption expressed in morphine equivalent dose will be recorded, including IV and oral opioids. Time in hours from operation conclusion to discharge and discharge disposition (to where the patient is discharged) will also be recorded. Post-operative pain scores will be assessed and recorded in the immediate post-operative period and every 4 hours subsequently until the patient is discharged. Medication related side effects will be monitored. The investigators hypothesize that the injection cohort will have reduced pain scores, lower narcotic requirements, shorter length of stay, and be more likely to discharge to home following surgery.
This pilot study will test the hypothesis that prolonged regional peripheral nerve block will reduce development of chronic pain in patients undergoing surgery for ankle fracture compared to standard of care. Subjects will be followed for one year.
Title: Ropivacaine versus Bupivacaine as Preventive Analgesia in Surgical Incision Site In Patients With Ankle Fracture Background: Ankle fractures are about 10% of the fractures associate to sports and with an incidence of 0.11 of 1000 adult patients. Weber classification system divides ankle fractures in three types according to the anatomy of lateral malleolus. B fractures starts at tibia pilon. Stable fractures are easily treated in conservative way. (12) Unstable fractures are treated surgically with anatomic reduction and internal fixation. However, it's been reported that even with successful reduction surgically great results are not always achieved. Local wound infiltration blocks the pain in its origin, surgical site by itself, without alter motor function. Practically without presenting adverse events with this method. it´s accurate for ambulatory surgery. Main Objetive: To compare preventive analgesia with local anesthetic in surgical site with ropivacaine or bupivacaine in ankle fracture patients treated surgically with open reduction and internal fixation. Method: Two groups with ankle fractures which will be informed and the patients will sign informed consent, after that the patients will be assign to a group (Ropivacaine or bupivacaine). The patient will be prepared for surgical treatment according to his doctor. It will be applied traditional anesthesia. It will be applied before beginning surgery in bupivacaine group 25 mg and in ropivacaine group 37.5 mg at least 10 minutes before starting surgery. After that the patient will have the traditional dose of analgesic treatment.The group will evaluate the pain with VAS 0-10 at 4,8,12 and 24 hours after surgery. The group will register data and will make statistic analysis. It will be elaborated the conclusion an elaboration of a report. Resources: The group counts with human resources of the group of investigators. The hospital has in emergency department almost three patients with ankle fractures each day which require surgical treatment. The hospital has x ray service to valuate the ankle fracture and with computer system to analyze it. The hospital has the software for statistical analysis. Experience: The group is formed with orthopedic surgeons with more than 5 years in treatment of ankle fractures. Investigators have the support of pain medicine group in hospital and with anesthesia coordinators. Investigators have a group of orthopedic residents which will be encharged of ilfiltration wound site. Time: September 2016 to February 2017.
Treatment of syndesmotic injury with Weber C fracture. A randomized study comparing ZipTight suture endobutton and one tricortical 3,5 mm syndesmotic screw.
The purpose of this trial is to determine the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of robot-assisted rehabilitation using ARBOT in patients with ankle dysfunction resulting from work related ankle fractures, compared with conventional rehabilitation programs.