View clinical trials related to Angina.
Filter by:Coronary artery stenting has evolved as an effective treatment for angina and involves stretching up narrowings within the heart arteries using a balloon (coronary angioplasty) before implanting a small metal scaffold (stent) to splint the artery open. It is imperative that stents are fully expanded when they are deployed. If not, then patients are exposed to the serious risk of a blood clot forming in the stent (stent thrombosis), or the stent renarrowing (restenosis). One fifth of patients experiencing stent thrombosis will die and 70% will suffer a heart attack. Restenosis is associated with recurrent angina and heart attacks. Arguably, visualising stents and ensuring adequate stent expansion is most challenging in patients with extensive hardening, or calcification, of the heart arteries. Optical coherence tomography is a novel technique that utilises near-infrared light to look inside small blood vessels in fine detail. It is 10 times more powerful than the best existing technique, intravascular ultrasound. The purpose of this study is to compare the utility of optical coherence tomography with intravascular ultrasound in patients with heavily calcified heart arteries undergoing rotational atherectomy and coronary stent insertion. It is hoped that the results of this pilot study will provide proof-of-principle and justification for a larger clinical trial to formally assess the role of optical coherence tomography to guide coronary angioplasty and stenting in patients with heavily calcified coronary arteries.
Based on limited published epidemiological data, up to an alarming 1 in 50 surgical inpatients die within 30 postoperative days. Based on our own data from the B-Unaware (NCT00281489) and BAG-RECALL (NCT00682825) clinical trials, 30-day postoperative mortality among high-risk surgical patients is comparable to this at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, and 1-year mortality among high-risk surgical patients may be as high as 10%. Short- and intermediate-term postoperative mortality is therefore a pressing public health concern. Similarly, postoperative major morbidity - including delirium, stroke, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, blood clots, renal dysfunction, wound infection, pneumonia, respiratory failure, loss of functionality, and chronic pain - occurs commonly and affects a substantial proportion of surgical patients, critically ill patients and patients undergoing procedures for chronic pain. Many factors associate strongly and independently with postoperative mortality and major morbidity: patient age, functional status, comorbid medical conditions, and duration and invasiveness of surgery, among others. It is a strategic priority to identify pre- and intraoperative risk factors that are subject to modification.
The purpose of this study is to compare different methods of collecting the amount of radiation exposure patients receive in a clinical study. As part of the PROMISE study, the Duke Clinical Research Institute Outcomes and Follow-up Group will be contacting patients every six months to ask if they had any heart procedures or testing. This information will be used to estimate the amount of radiation that they may have received from heart testing being studied in this study, PROMISE-SAFER. Patients will be asked to collect information about each heart testing they receive during the time that they are enrolled in the PROMISE study. At the conclusion of the study, we will be able to determine which method was most accurate in collecting the amount of radiation exposure for this clinical study. Through this study we hope to develop an improved methodology to estimate cumulative radiation exposure from cardiac imaging. Comprehensive measurement of cumulative radiation exposure to patients may be critically important to minimize potential harm in future studies and in clinical practice.
Coronary vascular dysfunction is highly prevalent among patients with known or suspected Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)1, increases the severity of inducible myocardial ischemia (beyond the effects of upstream coronary obstruction)2, and identifies patients at high risk for serious adverse events, including cardiac death1, 3-5. Diabetic patients without known CAD with impaired coronary vascular function show a risk of cardiac death comparable to, and possibly higher, than that for non-diabetic patients with known CAD10. In the setting of increased oxygen demand, coronary vasodilator dysfunction can upset the supply-demand relationship and lead to myocardial ischemia, subclinical left ventricular dysfunction (diastolic and systolic), and symptoms. The significance of microvascular coronary dysfunction is increasingly recognized as invasive and non-invasive (PET) methods of quantifying CFR become available. Importantly, current treatment strategies for obstructive CAD, such as percutaneous coronary intervention with angioplasty and stenting, are not helpful in microvascular disease. Similarly, mortality-altering treatments for systolic heart failure, such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, have not been beneficial in treating diastolic dysfunction.
The objectives of the PMS are to observe the frequency, type, and degree of device deficiency to assure the safety of the new medical device (XIENCE PRIME) as well as to collect information on evaluation of the efficacy and safety for reevaluation.
The association between obesity and cardiovascular disease (CVD) has mostly been studied using broad endpoints or have focused on cause-specific mortality. The investigators aim to compare the effect of body mass index (BMI) on different types of initial presentation of CVD.
We hypothesize that Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) severity assessed by SYNTAX score is an independent predictor of recurrent or persistent angina following coronary revascularization. The SYNTAX score is a score that suggests the severity of coronary artery disease detected by coronary angiography. Coronary revascularization is a procedure that occurs in two ways, a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and is done when there is narrowing and blockage or hardening of the arteries (atherosclerosis) surrounding the heart. Narrowing and blockages reduce blood flow to parts of the heart causing chest pain (known as angina) and sometimes myocardial infarction.
Nasal oxygen is widely used as pain relief against ischemic pain during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). However, to our knowledge no randomised clinical trials have tested this. In contrast, oxygen causes coronary artery vasoconstriction in man. Furthermore, a recent Cochrane meta-analysis has shown no evidence of beneficial effect of oxygen for patients with acute myocardial infarction (with normal blood saturation. The investigators therefore wanted to examine if oxygen reduces ischemic pain during PCI for stable angina or NSTEMI.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether stress echocardiography or computed tomography (CT) of the heart is better at diagnosing emergency room chest pain patients to select appropriate candidates for hospitalization and further work-up.
The purpose of the study is to determine if the medication, ranolazine (study drug), can help improve blood flow to your heart, increase your exercise capacity and improve your quality of life (QOL). For this study, you will be asked to perform several tests in order to determine if your heart function, exercise capacity, chest pain and QOL have improved after 3 months of treatment with ranolazine. Ranolazine is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of angina.