View clinical trials related to Angina, Stable.
Filter by:The purpose of the study is to identify proteins, metabolites and signal pathways related directly to symptomatic atherosclerosis and to disease progression. In the study, we use residual material from angioplasty catheter balloons and from vascular surgery plus blood samples. It is the hypothesis that material left on the catheter balloons used for angioplasty can be used for proteomics and metabolomics evaluation that will identify inflammation-associated proteins and signaling pathways directly in the diseased vessel. The tissue samples will be collected after the procedure and blood samples will be collected at the procedure plus after 6-12 months. The tissue and blood samples will be analyzed using mass spectrometry methods and a standard panel of biomarkers will also be analyzed using standardized methods. The analyses will include study of inflammation-associated peptides observed in autoinflammation as well as thrombogenic signaling pathways and local expression of biomarkers. The analyses of proteins, metabolites and/or biomarkers will be compared between cases (stable angina, unstable angina/non-STEMI, STEMI and vascular surgery) and controls (procedures not related to coronary artery diseases) to identify molecular processes related directly to symptomatic atherosclerosis and will be associated with disease progression using data from medical journals and National Health registries. The study will recruit 225 patients from Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, and Herlev-Gentofte Hospital.
The Kitasato PCI Registry is a single-center, observational, prospective study. This study aims to investigate the impact of characteristics in clinical manifestation, patients' background, procedure of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and pre/post PCI culprit/nonculprit lesion observed by intra-coronary imaging modality on clinical outcomes.
Despite the year-on-year decrease, coronary artery disease (CAD) still remains one of the leading cause of mortality worldwide. With advances in technology and our understanding of cardiac disease, we can now treat CAD using minimally invasive interventional techniques. This has revolutionised treatment for and improved the lives of many patients with CAD. Although trials have assessed various therapeutic strategies in various populations, real-world evidence of intervention and medical treatment among patients with CAD is increasingly recognised as an important part of providing safety and efficacy data and improving the care we provide. This data will add to that literature by assessing the characteristics and outcomes of patients with CAD. It will also identify and characterise predictors of outcomes, improve risk stratification and diagnostic evaluation.
An acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction occurs due to occlusion of one or more coronary arteries, causing transmural myocardial ischemia which in turn results in myocardial injury or necrosis. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may lead to the development of heart failure (HF). Accessible diagnostic tools commonly used in HF such as natriuretic peptides and (NYHA) classification reflect already overt clinical HF. Troponin and creatine kinase reflect myocardial damage, but their usefulness in predicting long-term LVR is limited. Recent guidelines on HF management stressed that HF onset may be delayed or prevented through certain Interventions, such as pharmacotherapy ,post infarction rehabilitation, or modification of HF risk factors. Therefore, it is important to identify potential markers, which would be more informative of HF preclinical stages to recognize patients with an increased risk of HF onset, and to start treatment in advance (1) Gal-3 participates in inflammation and pro fibrotic pathways, while sST2 is a biomarker of inflammation, cardiac mechanical strain, and tissue fibrosis, both of which may predict LVR (2). sST is a biomarker of inflammation, cardiac mechanical strain, and tissue fibrosis(3). B_type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is elevated in acute myocardial infarction and is a quantitative biochemical marker related to the extent of infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction(4).
This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single arm, objective performance goal (OPG) study is designed to evaluate clinical outcomes after complete revascularization by PCI and imaging guidance (OCT) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease including left anterior descending (LAD) presenting with stable angina, or documented silent ischemia, or non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).
METHOD is a prospective observational program that will be conducted in 1centre of the Russian Federation. Prospective follow-up will be for about 6 months. The METHOD study is a 2 visit study with first visit of inclusion and second visit of completion of the study. Patients with stable angina pectoris eligible to the study inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in this observational program. The parameters for analysis will be collected by doctors and entered into CRF. The final analysis will include data from patients who were taking TMZ 80 mg OD during the observational period. The decision to stop the study will be made once 36 patients receiving treatment with trimetazidine 80 mg OD will have been evaluated at V1. It is expected that 5 cardiologists will participate in the program. The planned number of patients is 36.
ORBITA-CTO Pilot is a double blinded randomised placebo-controlled trial comparing the effects of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention versus placebo on symptoms of angina in patients with background optimal medical therapy.
PROPHET-FFR is a single center ambispective registry aiming to explore the impact of post-revascularization functional assessment on later outcomes.
The purpose of the SIROOP Registry is to retrospectively and prospectively collect baseline, clinical and procedural characteristics of patients who have undergone PCI and are treated with either currently available sirolimus or paclitaxel coated DCBs (see Table 1), irrespective of clinical presentation as well as to prospectively collect data about their clinical outcomes. Outcomes will be compared in different clinical subgroups. The impact of current DCBs in different clinical settings and coronary artery lesions on cardiovascular outcomes will be assessed.
The purpose of this research is to find out if doing cardiac rehab at home, or a mix of cardiac rehab at home and in the clinic, is as effective as coming in to the clinic for cardiac rehab.