Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05775861 |
Other study ID # |
2022-2892 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 23, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
June 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2024 |
Source |
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal |
Contact |
Ariane AC Clairoux, MD, FRCPC |
Phone |
5142226743 |
Email |
ariane.clairoux[@]umontreal.ca |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Arthroscopic shoulder surgery is increasingly performed in an outpatient setting and
post-operative pain management is often a real challenge as those surgeries are well
recognized for their high level of pain which often affects physical rehabilitation. The
interscalene block is a largely used anesthetic technique to perform these surgeries whilst
avoiding general anesthesia (GA) and to provide postoperative analgesia. However, the painful
period often exceeds the duration of a single shot block, thus affecting patient recovery.
Some specialized centers use a continuous catheter and elastomeric pump in order to prolong
the duration of analgesia. However, several logistical, professional and financial
constraints limit the use of these catheters and pumps in a great number of outpatient
centers. On the other hand, perineural dexmedetomidine is increasingly used as an adjuvant to
improve block onset, analgesia duration and patient satisfaction.
The use of adjuvants such as perineural dexmedetomidine added to a single shot interscalene
block appears to be an interesting option to prolong postoperative analgesia without the
limitations imposed by a continuous catheter and elastomeric pumps in arthroscopic shoulder
surgeries.
Description:
A growing number of arthroscopic shoulder surgeries are performed in an ambulatory setting.
For these patients, postoperative pain management is an important factor for analgesia and
optimal rehabilitation. Peripheral nerve blocks, and more particularly the interscalene
brachial plexus block (ISB), is the method of choice to provide adequate surgical conditions
and satisfactory postoperative pain control for shoulder surgeries. Even before the advent of
ultrasound guidance , interscalene blocks resulted in a high level of patient satisfaction,
fewer post-operative complications and a reduction of hospital stay compared to general
anesthesia.
Shoulder surgeries are well recognized to cause severe postoperative pain, mainly in the
first 48h, and the use of a single shot interscalene block (SSISB) is limited by its duration
of action, which often fails to cover the duration of postoperative analgesia beyond 24
hours.
On the other hand, ultrasound-guided continuous interscalene blocks (CISB) have shown a
significant reduction of pain compared to single shot interscalene blocks. However, CISB are
limited by many logistical problems which make their use difficult in most ambulatory
centers. Indeed, catheter placement is often a technically challenging procedure and
accidental catheter removal is a complication that limits their usefulness. However, when the
necessary technical resources and medical expertise is available, CISB have been associated
with a superior level of analgesia, reduction of opioid consumption, improvements in rest and
dynamic pain, and lower instances of postoperative nausea and vomiting than SSISB in major
shoulder surgery. A recent study has demonstrated that automated intermittent boluses did not
provide better analgesia nor reduced rescue opioid consumption compared to continuous
infusion of ropivacaine despite both groups describing insufficient pain relief.
The persistence of pain despite the use of SSISB or CISB has lead several anesthesia teams to
use adjuvants to improve the effect and duration of analgesia. Over the years, several
adjuvants have been administered to enhance the brachial plexus block onset and duration.
Thus, intravenous dexamethasone administered at the time of performing ISB is widely used to
improve the duration of analgesia following shoulder surgeries. In addition to the benefits
already provided by the addition of intravenous dexamethasone, there is also an added value
to perineural dexmedetomidine in order to accelerate the onset of motor and sensory block,
extend the duration of the block and reduce the pain score 14 hours postoperatively in
elective shoulder surgery.
The combination of intravenous or perineural dexmedetomidine, an α-2 adrenoceptor agonist,
with ropivacaine prolongs the duration of SSISB analgesia and reduces opioid consumption
postoperatively without prolonging the duration of motor blockade during outpatient shoulder
surgeries. Patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery under general anesthesia with
perineural dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine for interscalene block had a faster sensory
and motor block onset, an increased duration of nerve blockade and improved postoperative
pain up to 14h after the block. Even when a peripheral nerve block is used as the primary
anesthetic, SSISB with perineural dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine in arthroscopic
rotator cuff repair has shown lower pain and improved patient satisfaction within 48 h
postoperatively. The perfect perineural dexmedetomidine dose should provide optimal analgesia
with minimal side effects such as hypotension and bradycardia. Over the years, it has been
used in wide-ranging doses and 2 mcg/kg seems to be the optimal dose in SSISB for
arthroscopic shoulder surgery to obtain a suitable duration of analgesia. A recent
meta-analysis demonstrates the safety of perineural dexmedetomidine as well as its
effectiveness during brachial plexus block to accelerate the onset of action and prolong the
duration of analgesia. Indeed, no neurological complications or neurotoxic symptoms were
reported in patients who received perineural dexmedetomidine.
Rationale for this study:
The addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine for SSIB could improve the duration of
postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction for arthroscopic shoulder surgeries without
the limitations and potential complications of an CISB catheter and elastomeric pump.
Moreover, the use of a catheter is a complex procedure compared to a single injection and
thus limited in some centers due to logistical limitations. Therefore, SSISB with perineural
dexmedetomidine could be an interesting alternative to perform shoulder surgeries in centers
where the use of a continuous catheter is limited by technical, professional or financial
resources. Ultimately, this improvement in postoperative analgesia could lead to early
patient mobilization, better physical rehabilitation and improved patient satisfaction. This
study will focus on recovery, to better understand patient outcomes and experiences as a
whole, in this era of personalized medicine and patient oriented research.
Methods: A predetermined sample size of patients of more than18 years old, ASA status I-III
scheduled to undergo elective minor ambulatory shoulder surgery are included. Patients with
known allergy to local anesthetics, contraindication to interscalene brachial plexus nerve
block or superficial cervical plexus block will be excluded. The premedication and peripheral
nerve block technique will be standardized for both groups. Patients will be randomized to
receive either a single shot interscalene block with 150 mg of isobaric ropivacaine 0.5% (125
mg at the interscalene brachial plexus level and 25 mg at the superficial cervical plexus)
with 2 mcg/kg (IBW) of dexmedetomidine or a continuous interscalene block with an initial
dose of 150 mg of isobaric ropivacaine 0.5% (125 mg at the interscalene brachial plexus level
and 25 mg at the superficial cervical plexus) and an infusion using an elastomeric pump of
300 mL at a rate of 5 mL/h of isobaric ropivacaine 0.2% for 60 hours. The primary endpoint
will be the Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 48h. The secondary endpoints will
be: QoR-15 at 24h and 72h, time before the first analgesic request, time before the end of
sensory block, time before the end of motor block, patient satisfaction, total post-operative
opioid consumption, major and minor complications.
Study design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Subject population: Adult patients scheduled to undergo elective arthroscopic ambulatory
shoulder surgery
Sample size: 96
Study duration: 12 months
Study center: CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
Adverse Events: None expected
Subvention: applications to the Canadian Society of Anesthesia as well as to the Foundation
of the Association of the Anesthesiologists of Quebec and to the department of anesthesiology
of the UdeM will be proposed within the coming year 2021-2022.