Clinical Trials Logo

Anesthesia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Anesthesia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04586751 Completed - Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

The Impact of Pecs Blocks on Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome

Start date: August 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the present study is to investigate the incidence of chronic pain following breast cancer surgery in Cyprus, discover its associated risk factors and explore the impact of Pecs Blocks on the appearance of post mastectomy chronic pain symptoms

NCT ID: NCT04586569 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

PIRA vs Standard Preoperative Education

Start date: July 6, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of enhanced preoperative education using a Pediatric Interactive Relational Agent (PIRA), designed for children ages 4 through10 years and their families, compared to the standard preoperative education currently provided. The study will also look at any differences in anxiety between the two educational groups.

NCT ID: NCT04581720 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Minimum Current for Train-of-four Monitoring

Start date: October 12, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Neuromuscular monitoring during general anesthesia is important to make sure adequate muscle relaxation during operation and adequate recovery of muscle power and spontaneous breathing during emergence from general anesthesia. The neuromuscular monitoring is usually using electrical stimulants and the method called train-of-four (TOF) is representative. Because it uses electrical stimulants, the patients could be uncomfortable and feel pain during the monitoring when the patients are conscious. Lowering the current of the stimulants would be helpful in reducing the pain, but there is a concern that the TOF results performed in lower current would be underestimated or inaccurate. Therefore, the investigators want to find the minimal current for TOF monitoring that shows adequate TOF results.

NCT ID: NCT04581616 Completed - Postoperative Pain Clinical Trials

The Effect of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block and Intraoperative Intercostal Nerve Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Thoracic Surgery

Start date: October 16, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to compare the effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and interthoracic intercostal nerve block in thoracic surgery. Interthoracic intercostal nerve block is a routine procedure during the surgery by the surgeon in our hospital, and ultrasound-guide erector spinae plane block is a relative new developed regional analgesia technique introduced since 2016 and mainly done by anesthesiologists. Both technique provide analgesic effect to some extent and reduce opiate consumption and side effects. However, no previous literature or research compare the effect of these two technique in thoracic surgery. The primary endpoint of our study is compare morphine consumption and pain score between patients undergo ESP block and patients undergo ICNB after thoracic surgery; the second endpoint is to compare the recovery condition evaluated by QoR-15 questionaire 24 hours after surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04574947 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Lidocaine And Neuromonitoring in Thyroid Surgery

Start date: January 25, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that the quality of recovery with topical lidocaine is better than placebo.

NCT ID: NCT04570150 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Optimizing Post-operative Recovery in Bariatric Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Outpatient Surgery: A Comparison of Sugammadex and Neostigmine

Start date: January 4, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study assesses the efficacy of sugammadex against neostigmine for hastening recovery from neuromuscular blockade and optimizing pulmonary function in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea presenting for outpatient surgery. Both drugs are used in anesthesiology to reverse neuromuscular blockade that is given in the setting of inducing and maintaining general anesthesia.

NCT ID: NCT04567160 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

NOL Index to Compare the Intraoperative Analgesic Effect of Propofol Versus Sevoflurane

PROSEVNOL
Start date: October 1, 2020
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study is to compare the analgesic properties of propofol and sevoflurane using variation of the NOL index and standard monitoring (Heart Rate and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure) when patients under general anaesthesia with either agents are subjected to a standardized painful stimulus (a tetanic stimulation over the ulnar nerve at 70 mA, 100 Hz for 30 seconds).

NCT ID: NCT04566536 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

NoL Monitor Performances of Nociceptive and Non-nociceptive Stimuli Discrimination During Robotic Surgery

ROBOTNOL
Start date: October 7, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Anesthesia quality and safety have improved over the past decades, thanks to improved monitoring devices. No nociception monitoring is currently part of the standard of care. Usually, hemodynamic parameters are used to evaluate nociception (heart rate, HR, and mean arterial pressure, MAP), but none of them are specific. However, nociception evaluation is critical. Indeed, where excess of nociception can lead to arterial hypotension and respiratory depression, insufficient nociception can lead to acute postoperative pain, which is followed by persistent chronic pain in 10-50% of patients. Different monitoring devices have been developed but none of them are still used in current practice. Recently developed, the nociception level (NoL) index (MEDASENSE BIOMETRICS Ltd®, Ramat Gan, Israel) is an index of nociception, based on a nonlinear algorithm combination of heart rate, heart rate variability, photoplethysmograph wave amplitude, skin conductance, skin conductance fluctuations, and their time derivatives. Robotic surgeries have started to spread over the world 20 years ago, claiming to be mini-invasive with less hemorrhage complications, with better success based on the technical advantages of the robot allowing better access during anatomical challenges procedures. Robotic surgery has been suggested to decrease pain during surgery and post-operatively, because of the decreases abdominal wall constraints induced by the robotic arms compared to the surgeon arms. This observational prospective non-interventional monocentric study intend to evaluate the performance of the NoL index to discriminate protocol-defined nociceptive from non nociceptive stimuli during robotic surgery. All patients, scheduled for a robotic surgery procedure, will be orally informed about the study during the anesthesia consultation. During the procedure, the anesthesia procedure will be the same for all patients, as part of the usual care in our department. The NoL monitor will be added for the purpose of this study, but the results will be hidden from all physicians. All settings will be left the physician in charge. At the end of the surgical procedure, before transfer to the recovery room, data for the monitor will be extracted on a dedicated universal serial bus (USB) key. Files will be safely stored under RedCap before analysis.

NCT ID: NCT04566419 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

poStoperative Anesthesia Care: Facial Mask vs Hfnc and Thoracic Ultrasound for Reduction of Atelectasis Incidence

SAMURAI
Start date: October 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of post-operatory HFNC in reducing the incidence of hypoxemia after gynecological oncology surgery, compared to the standard application of O2 through a Venturi mask; The secondary objectives are to investigate the occurrence and entity of lung atelectasis, to evaluate diaphragmatic function and respiratory discomfort, and to evaluate the incidence of respiratory complications after seven days in the two groups. Patients will be randomized into two groups: HFNC and Control. The patients will be studied with preoperative lung and diaphragmatic ultrasound. Standard general anesthesia will be administered in the two groups. Ultrasound will be performed at arrival in the recovery room (RR) and before discharge from the RR. In the HFNC group, high-flow O2 will be administered; in the control group standard O2 therapy with Venturi mask will be administered. Arterial blood gas analysis upon arrival in the RR and after two hours of O2 therapy in both groups will be checked. The incidence of post-operative respiratory complications will be monitored in the seven days following surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04540055 Completed - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

General Anesthesia and Paravertebral Blocks vs. General Anesthesia Only: Influence Inflammation Factors and Clinical Outcomes in Modified Radical Mastectomy

Start date: October 1, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Regional anesthesia and analgesia may maintain immune function, reduce surgical stress, and also reduce volatile anesthetics and opioids requirements. Local anesthetic drugs used in regional anesthesia and analgesia work to have anti-proliferative and cytotoxic effects on cancer cells. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-alpha increase in levels in peripheral nerves, spinal cord, brain (brain stem, locus sereleus, thalamus, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex) after peripheral nerves are injured. The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 is decreased in levels after peripheral nerve injury. The balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines affects the severity of pain.