View clinical trials related to Anesthesia, Spinal.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of hypotension between remimazolam and propofol for intraoperative sedation in patients undergoing hip surgery with spinal anesthesia.
Nusinersen (Spinraza, Biogen Inc, Boston, MA), the first treatment approved by FDA and EMA for all Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) subtypes, is an antisense oligonucleotide that is administered intrathecally through a lumbar puncture. This procedure can be challenging in some adults with intermediate and late onset SMA (types II-IV) frequently presenting scoliosis secondary to neuromuscular weakness and often treated with spinal instrumentation to prevent worsening deformities. In such patients, in order to access the intrathecal space, US guidance and/or assistance have been recently proposed as useful and successful tool. The US guidance and/or assistance have been associated to a high success rate, a reduction of number of attempts and needle passes to obtain a successful anesthesia. A reduced risk of adverse events (AEs), such as post dural puncture headache (PDPH) and low back pain (LBP), and low patient satisfaction often associated with multiple needle punctures was also reported. Aim of this retrospective study was to report the efficacy, evaluated as rate of the successful procedures and subsequent delivery of nusinersen within the subarachnoid space, the number of attempts, the procedure time and the adverse events (AEs) of interlaminar intrathecal nusinersen administration using either ultrasound assistance or the landmark-based technique in a historical cohort of 51 adult SMA patients.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of anesthetic techniques (general and spinal anesthesia) on umbilical cord neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and mean platelet volume (MPV) in patients undergoing cesarean section.
Currently used drugs for monitored general anesthesia include propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine. Each drug has different advantages and disadvantages. Remimazolam causes a relatively small decrease in blood pressure, and it has no injection pain. In addition, remimazolam has a very short onset time, and even after the continuous infusion, the onset of remimazolam is fast, and even after continuous injection, the effect disappeared very quickly due to the short context-sensitive half time. and through continuous infusion, the patient's depth of anesthesia can be maintained constant. In addition, the short duration of action and the ability to quickly reverse the effect of flumazenil suggest that remimazolam can be used effectively under general anesthesia as well as under general anesthesia. Remimazolam can be used as a continuous infusion for general anesthesia. However, it has also been reported to be used for sedation by continuous infusion or divided intravenous infusion. However, the effective infusion dose of remimazolam for supervised general anesthesia without mechanical ventilation has not been established. In this study, the ED90 of the maintenance dose that maintain loss of consciousness in patients when supervised general anesthesia is performed through continuous infusion of remimazolam after spinal anesthesia is obtained.
Cardiac output will be measured in healthy parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia
About 15 million spinal anesthesia procedures are performed worldwide each year. In the daily practice of the anesthesiologist for intrathecal use there are various local anesthetics such as bupivacaine, hyperbaric solution of bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. From 1946 to 2017, only 16 studies comparing the clinical efficacy of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine in nonpregnant patients have been conducted according to various databases. The small sample size and high heterogeneity of these results suggest that all results should be treated with caution. And, there is no conclusive evidence in favor of isobaric or hyperbaric bupivacaine regarding efficacy or side effects in the general surgical population. The literature describes such advantages of levobupivacaine as less cardiotoxicity, longer period of analgesia, more pronounced activity against sensory fibers than against motor fibers. In some studies it has been shown that levobupivacaine is equal to isobaric bupivacaine in efficacy. The efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine equivalent to hyperbaric bupivacaine when administered intrathecally has also been shown on volunteers. However, in the literature there are different data on clinical efficacy of levobupivakin in comparison with ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. So during operations on extremities out of 20 patients surgical anesthesia developed in 18 patients. Fattorini F. et al. D in their study stated the same effectiveness of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine, but when using levobupivacaine in one patient general anesthesia was used due to insufficient spinal anesthesia. Other studies also reported similar efficacy of the two drugs, but surgical satisfaction with intraoperative anesthesia was 92.9% for bupivacaine and 83.9% for levobupivacaine for knee arthoroscopy. In their study, P Gautier et al. noted significantly lower efficacy of levobupivacaine in caesarean section compared to bupivacaine and ropivacaine for intrathecal use: 80% vs. 90% and 87%, respectively. According to Heng Sia et al. there is no clear evidence of the advantage of hyperbaric bupivacaine over isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. The authors also noted that adequate randomized clinical trials with clear definitions, criteria and methodology for evaluating the transition to general anesthesia, requirements for additional analgesia, nausea, vomiting and sensory testing are needed. There is no clear practical guide to help anesthesiologists make informed decisions about the use of some form of intrathecal bupivacaine in non-cesarean surgery. Carefully designed, adequately conducted studies can provide further results that will contribute to sound clinical decision making. Given the above, the aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia (SA) performed with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine solution, 0.5% levobupivacaine solution and 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution in equivalent volumes in lower limb surgeries.
The proposed pilot study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, single-center pilot study.The aim of this pilot project is to evaluate the feasibility of a phase III study on the use of dexmedetomidine in intrathecal in the context of elective cesarean section. The target population for the study will be adult pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. This study will be carried out at a single site, the CHU Sainte-Justine as part of a research internship as part of the anesthesiology residency program at the University of Montreal.
This randomized double-blind study aimed to compare the effects of two different subaracnoid lokal anesthetic injection rate in cesarean section. Totally 67 patients were included. The groups were compared in terms of maximum sensory and motor block level, time to reach T6 level, hemodynamic changes and nausea- vomiting saved.
Patients undergoing elective primary total hip replacement and spinal anesthesia may encounter significant hemodynamic instability. The study is a randomized controlled type and is aimed at comparing how perioperatory hypotension and fluid regimen are managed using Clearsight non invasive monitoring system or PAM monitoring. The primary endpoint is to evaluate total duration of hypotension, defined as a MAP < 65 mmHg, calculated during all the perioperatory time. Fifty-eight patients, aged 50-80 years, with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) score I, II and III were enrolled and split in two groups (Clearsight and control group). Patients were monitored both with the EV1000 platform, the Clearsight finger-cuff and MAP monitoring. Depending on the group, the fluid regimen was a goal directed fluid therapy or a liberal fluid regimen.
Most of caesarean sections can be performed under spinal anaesthesia. Its major advantages are reliability and fast onset. However, dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine used, combination with adjuvants, hemodynamic management, and impact of these measures on maternal experience are not uniform. This study aims to describe practices of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in France to improve practices, guide new studies and establish protocols.