View clinical trials related to Anastomotic Leak Rectum.
Filter by:The aim of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the mobile application "Colorectal Leakage App" in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgeries at the National Research Oncology Center in Astana, Kazakhstan. Main Questions: 1. Development, validation, and implementation of the mobile application "Colorectal Leakage App," based on the Dutch Leakage Score. 2. Evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of the application in detecting anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgeries. 3. Determine the frequency of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgeries performed in the colorectal surgery sector of the National Research Oncology Center in the Astana city. Participants in the study, individuals aged 18 and above undergoing colorectal surgeries, will be monitored by the mobile application "Colorectal Leakage App" in the postoperative period for early identification of anastomotic leakage.
Pilot RCT with 20 patients in both test and control group. In the control group resection & anastomosis was done using the conventional method. In the test group after devascularisation the resection line was marked on the bowel wall and IRT done using a forward looking infra- red camera with a rainbow display. Resection line was determined by a sharp change in colour on the display screen (corresponding to > 30C change in surface temperature) over the visualised bowel wall. Margins were revised if difference between surgeon and IRT determined resection lines were more than 1cm apart. Anastomosis was done as per surgeon's preference.AL was the primary outcome measure. Hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, post-operative complications as per Clavien-Dindo classification were the secondary outcome measures.
Anastomotic leakage is a severe complication that can arise following a colorectal resection. It impairs both the short- and long-term outcomes, and negatively influences cancer recurrence rates. Its detrimental effects resound in healthcare costs of a patient after anastomotic leakage, €71,978, versus patients with an uncomplicated course, €17,647. Despite multiple innovations within the field of colorectal surgery, the incidence of colorectal anastomotic leakage did not reduce in the past decade. Mitigation strategies such as prehabilitation, intraoperative optimization, selective bowel decontamination, and reconstruction techniques are promising but do not completely eliminate the risk of leakage. The only true prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage is the omission of an anastomosis and implies an ostomy, which in itself has a negative impact on the quality of life. A stoma is associated with stoma-related morbidity and should, therefore, be avoided in patients who do not need it. Predicting anastomotic leakage intra-operatively, just before the construction of the anastomosis, may offer a solution. A stoma will then only be constructed in those at high risk of anastomotic leakage. Currently, there are prediction models for anastomotic leakage based on conventional multivariate logistic regression analysis, however, these are not useful for clinical practice due to suboptimal results. Machine learning algorithms, on the other hand, take well into account the multifactorial nature of complications and might thus be able to predict anastomotic leakage more accurately. The machine learning model we created proved to be well capable of making accurate predictions. This model was developed based on a database containing both pre- and intra-operative data from 2,483 patients. Before these models can be used in daily practice, external validation is essential. Our models should be tested on unseen data from patients treated in centers that were not previously involved in the database that was used to train the model in order to achieve high reproducibility. Our hypothesis is that with our model, we can accurately predict anastomotic leakage intra-operatively during colorectal surgery.
Anastomotic leakage is one of the most serious postoperative complications of low rectal cancer, with an incidence of 3%-21%. The occurrence of anastomotic leakage is related to many factors, and the occurrence of anastomotic leakage can be predicted by building a prediction model. Most of the anastomotic leakage prediction models constructed in the past are nomograms, which have limitations in the fitting of model creation. In the previous study, the center took the lead in building a random forest anastomotic leakage prediction model based on machine learning. This study intends to prospectively enroll patients with rectal cancer undergoing anterior abdominal resection and use their clinical data to prospectively verify the efficacy of the anastomotic leakage prediction model, and further improve and promote the prediction model.
This study aim to determine if a different surgical technique could result in a lower anastomotic leak rate. The two techniques are equally used around the world and well described by the international literature but this is the first study that compare the two techniques.
Rectal cancer is one of the most frequent cancer diseases, with more than 1500 new cases per year in Denmark. Fortunately, if the tumor is discovered early, surgeons can remove the part of the intestine that is afflicted, and they can often sew the intestine-ends back together, forming what is known as an anastomosis. However, in 10-15% of cases, this anastomosis doesn't heal completely, leading to anastomotic leakage. This is a serious complication, with detrimental effects for the individual patient. Previous measures to avoid this complication, have proven unsuccessful. Obsidian is a mixture derived from the patients' own blood, that contains components of blood normally responsible for stopping bleeding and kickstarting the healing process. It is already used in other clinical settings and preliminary, yet unpublished, results from a pilot study have shown its promise in decreasing the risk of anastomotic leakage in rectal anastomosis. However, its use has not been examined when performing surgery for rectal cancer with minimally invasive technique, which is today's standard. The main clinical hypothesis of this feasibility study is that it is possible for colorectal surgeons to apply Obsidian successfully on the anastomotic area with minimal invasive technique, as a supplement during rectal cancer resection with anastomosis. This study will be conducted at the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital. 50 patients will be included, who will undergo minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery with an anastomosis. Right after the onset of anaesthesia, 120 ml of blood will be collected from the patient and will be processed, making a 5-6 ml Obsidian concentrate. When the tumor-bearing part of the rectum has been removed, Obsidian will be applied, according to a pre-specified protocol. If the application is deemed successful (based on predefined assessment criteria) in at least 90% of our included patients, then this study will serve as a stepping stone for a bigger study, the aim of which will be to assess if this method can indeed bring down the rate of anastomotic leakage in such patients.
This multicenter open-label trial is designed to evaluate if the implementation of an enhanced peri-operative care protocol results in an optimal intraoperative condition of the patient and in a decrease in incidence of anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection as compared to current practice.
Anastomotic insufficiency remains one of the most significant problems after rectal resection.The complications following anastomotic insufficiency leads to increased morbidity and mortality with subsequent prolongation of hospital stay and higher costs. This study is an investigation of the benefit of using an autologous platelet-rich fibrin matrix (Obsidian ASG®) for treatment of anastomosis during rectal surgery - a single-blind, randomized, multicenter pilot study with enrollment of 2x220 patients The main objective of the study is to investigate on an exploratory basis whether the use of Obsidian ASG® during rectal resection reduces the frequency of postoperative anastomotic insufficiency compared to standard anastomotic technique. The secondary objectives of the study are to investigate on an exploratory basis: - The frequency of anastomotic insufficiency (ISREC Criteria) severity - Staple line bleeding requiring surgical intervention - The duration of postoperative hospitalization are reduced when using Obsidian ASG ® compared with standard anastomotic treatment alone. are reduced when Obsidian ASG ® is added to the standard of anastomotic treatment compared with standard anastomotic treatment alone.
Hospital centralization effect is reported to lower complications and mortality especially for high risk and complex general surgery operations, including colorectal surgery. However, no linear relation between volume and outcome has been demonstrated. Aim of the study was to evaluate the increased surgical volume effect on early outcomes of patient undergoing restorative anterior rectal resection (ARR).
The use of regenerative medicine in colorectal surgery constitutes an entirely new therapeutic principle. The aim of this new therapeutic approach is to reduce the anastomotic leak rate and minimise morbidity and mortality. The literature identifies the leak rate for colorectal operations as 3-39%.