View clinical trials related to Anaphylaxis.
Filter by:This registry aims to monitor the safety of Breviscapine Powder-Injection and to identify the potential risk factors for the adverse drug reactions.
Peanut allergy can be life-threatening. Current diagnostic techniques for peanut allergy have high sensitivity, but not high specificity. This clinical trial will test the validity of a novel blood biomarker (compared with current testing) as a diagnostic predictor of anaphylaxis to peanut.
The main objective of this study is to compare pholcodine exposure in patients having presented with a perianaesthetic anaphylactic reaction to a NMBA (cases) to pholcodine exposure in matched anaesthetised patients with injection of NMBA, who did not present with an anaphylactic reaction (controls). The secondary objectives of the study are: - To compare anti-pholcodine IgE, anti-ammonium IV IgE and total IgE levels between the case and control groups. - To study the concordance between exposure to pholcodine in cases and controls, by means of a patient self-questionnaire on the one hand and, on the other hand, by a computerized drug history, supplemented where relevant by the drug master file. - To study the impact of taking 1, 2 or 3 sources in account for pholcodine exposition. - To study the association between exposure to pholcodine and the presence/levels of pholcodine-specific IgE, reflecting sensitisation to pholcodine. - To study NMBA and pholcodine cross-sensitisation by testing skin reactions to pholcodine in case patients allergic to (at least) one NMBA.
The purpose of this study is to assess the potential for hypersensitivity symptoms upon repeat exposure to sugammadex. Healthy participants will be randomized to one of three treatment arms: sugammadex 4 mg/kg, sugammadex 16 mg/kg or placebo. Participants will receive 3 single intravenous (IV) doses of their randomized treatment, with an approximately 5-week washout between Dose 1 and Dose 2 and between Dose 2 and Dose 3. Participants will be confined at the study center from the day before each dose until completion of the 24-hour post dose assessments.
Food allergies represent an increasing health concern in the industrialized countries and especially affect pediatric patients. In this population adverse reactions against food compounds can lead to anaphylactic reactions. Despite substantial research efforts, clinical markers predicting disease severity and symptoms are missing to date. Recent studies have revealed that sphingolipids, especially sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), play an essential role in allergy. It was reported that asthmatic patients have higher S1P levels in bronchiallavage fluids after allergen challenge. First experimental studies revealed a correlation of S1P and the outcome of anaphylaxis. Furthermore, we have shown in our recent mouse study that S1P homeostasis is pivotal for food allergy induction and effector cell response. Therefore, it is the aim of the presented pilot project to evaluate whether S1P serum titers are altered in food allergic children and if the S1P levels correlate with the outcome of anaphylaxis during double blind placebo controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs).
Anaphylaxis is defined as a serious allergic reaction mediated by IgE that is often difficult to diagnose due to the wide heterogeneity of clinical manifestations. The inciting agent is often difficult to pinpoint and may include food, environmental allergens in patients undergoing allergen immunotherapy, insect stings, and medications. Evidence of allergy by demonstration of a positive skin test to the inciting agent, is helpful only if skin testing is available. The only diagnostic modality that is useful in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis when IgE skin testing is not available and the inciting agent is unknown, is an elevated serum tryptase level. However, a diagnosis of anaphylaxis can be made without a tryptase level or if the tryptase level is normal. A simple, non-invasive test for patients with anaphylaxis is not currently available and would be helpful to diagnose and to guide further management options. Patients who develop anaphylaxis to environmental allergens or venoms during routine outpatient subcutaneous allergen or venom immunotherapy are an ideal population to study as we are able to evaluate these specific reactions in a controlled, clinical environment. Although anaphylaxis is uncommon, the incidence has been estimated to vary between 0.01 and 4 percent of all allergy injections. Subcutaneous allergen or venom immunotherapies are a well established form of therapy for patients with allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma, or a confirmed sensitivity to stinging insects. Serial blood sampling can be performed in this group of patients during a reaction and at baseline one week after a reaction, thereby allowing each patient to serve as his or her own biological control. Metabolomics is the study of metabolic pathways and the unique biochemical molecules which result from the regulatory response to physiological stressors, disease processes, drug therapy, or allergen or venom immunotherapy. By measuring changes in metabolite concentrations, the range of biochemical effects and therapeutic intervention can be determined. The investigator plans to use metabolic profiling of blood samples collected at the time of anaphylaxis and one week after, to see if a simple, non-invasive test for patients with anaphylaxis could be developed.
Metabolomics is the study of metabolic pathways and the unique biochemical molecules which result from the regulatory response to physiological stressors, disease processes, or drug therapy. By measuring changes in metabolite concentrations, the range of biochemical effects and therapeutic intervention can be determined. Aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyposis, asthma, and airway reactivity to aspirin and/or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This reaction to aspirin during challenge/desensitization is equivalent to an allergic drug reaction however we are able to evaluate these specific reactions in a controlled, clinical environment. This population of patients undergoing aspirin desensitization is ideal for studying metabolomics as serial blood sampling can be performed in patients before, during a reaction, and after aspirin desensitization, thereby allowing each patient to serve as his or her own biological control. The investigator hopes that this study of metabolomics will allow for better methods of identifying anaphylaxis in the future.
In about 10% of preoperative anaphylactic reactions to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) (114 patients analyzed at the BICHAT Hospital), a classical mechanism (mast cell- and IgE-dependent) is not identified. The mechanisms underlying these atypical anaphylactic reactions are unknown. The investigators have developed at the Pasteur Institute a murine model of anaphylaxis in which neutrophils, IgG and Platelet Activating Factor (PAF) play predominant roles. In addition, preliminary results obtained at the BICHAT Hospital suggest the presence of specific IgG anti-quaternary ammonium in the sera of patients that had developed a shock to NMBA anesthesia, but not in controls exposed to NMBA anesthesia or in normal blood donors. Finally, the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), extracellular filaments made of DNA and histones, may contribute to respiratory symptoms HYPOTHESIS: Neutrophils are implicated in NMBA -induced anaphylactic reactions in humans. Activated by IgG-NMBA complexes, which aggregate IgG receptors, neutrophils release PAF and NETs that are implicated in the cardiac and respiratory distress during anaphylaxis. It is possible that the activation of neutrophils: 1) explains the clinical features of atypical anaphylactic reactions (non-IgE mediated), 2) participates also in part to classical anaphylactic reactions GENERAL OBJECTIVE: Compare the percentage of circulating activated neutrophils in a group of patients immediately following a NMBA -induced shock (case) to that of a group of patients exposed to NMBA during anesthesia without developing a shock (control). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: A) the day of the shock, quantify and compare between case and controls, 1) the level of circulating anti-quaternary ammonium IgG by immuno fluorometry, 2) the expression of IgG receptors (FcR) on the surface of neutrophils by cytometry, 3) the levels of circulating PAF by mass spectrometry, 4) the amount of NETs by immunofluorescence. B) 6 to 10 weeks after the shock perform, 1) cutaneous tests to NMBA, 2) a study of the capacity of stimulation of ex vivo neutrophils by IgG- NMBA complexes
The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of serum tryptase for the confirmation of shrimp-induced anaphylaxis.
This study is a preliminary report of pharmacokinetic data of epinephrine administered via intranasal route (IN) comparing with intramuscular (IM) route in healthy adult volunteers.