View clinical trials related to Amputation.
Filter by:The investigation will be of a single group prospective pre/post design with follow up at 6 weeks (6WFU) and 6 months (6MFU); comparing to outcomes at baseline (BL). Device(s) being tested: Interchangeably: Direct Socket TF; DS-TF; DS Trans-femoral. The DS-TF is a trans-femoral (TF) set-up of the currently marketed trans-tibial version. It is not marketed in the USA and has not been registered with the FDA. The comparator is the current socket the subject is using when enrolled in the study. Subjects recruited: Minimum 50 Inclusion criteria: 50Kg< body weight < 160Kg Cognitive ability to understand all instructions and questionnaires in the study; Patients who have undergone a transfemoral amputation > 1 year post amputation Older than 18 years Willing and able to participate in the study and follow the protocol Circular dimension of 40-65 cm at the crotch Residual limb length at least 20 cm from ischium to distal end Currently using a prosthetic liner Locking users that can successfully be fitted with Iceross® Transfemoral Locking, OR Seal-In users that can successfully be fitted with either Iceross Seal-In® X5 TF or Iceross Transfemoral Seal-In® Exclusion criteria: 50Kg> body weight > 160Kg Users with cognitive impairment Patients who have undergone a transfemoral amputation <1 year post amputation Younger than 18 years Not a prosthetic ambulator, uses only the prosthesis for cosmetic reasons Circular dimension of less than 40 cm or greater than 65 cm at the crotch Residual limb length less than 20 cm from ischium to distal end Currently not using a prosthetic liner
Recent investigations have suggested that persons with upper limb loss experience a high prevalence of falls with a quarter of reported falls resulting from a trip. Moreover, studies indicate that missing part of an arm may negatively impact balance and that use of a prosthesis exacerbates this problem. While the investigators are beginning to understand the effects of upper limb loss on balance, the understanding of how Veterans with upper limb loss respond to walking disturbances is incomplete. Therefore, the aims of this study are to observe the effects of upper limb loss and wearing a prosthesis on the preparation and recovery of Veterans who trip during walking. The investigators plan to use unique treadmill technology to deliver controlled, yet unexpected, perturbations to Veterans with upper limb loss and non-amputee controls, and assess walking stability through body dynamics. Results from this study will help us understand why Veterans with upper limb loss fall as a critical first step to addressing this problem through balance-targeted interventions that are integrated into patient care.
This is a prospective, multi-national, multi-centre, randomized, non-blinded (photo evaluation is blinded), controlled clinical investigation in patients suffering from diabetic wounds reaching to tendon, bone, or joint. Patients will be randomised to received intact fish skin (Kerecis™ Omega3 Wound) plus standard of care or standard of care alone, and wound healing compared over 16 weeks.
Gait analysis is commonly performed in clinical practice. However, it is complex and requires an understanding of the activation of muscles in lower limbs, trunk, and upper limbs in a specific spatiotemporal pattern and the appropriate joint positions which support and advance the body weight in different phases of gait cycles. In study, we plan to pilot the application of 3D gait analysis with statistical modelling in 2 common causes of gait deviation: unilateral hemiplegic stroke and unilateral lower limb amputation.
The purpose of this study is to compare the functional differences between two types of foot prostheses for people with ankle disarticulation (Syme's) amputations. The two feet being tested are low- and high-profile feet, with the difference being the latter has an extended keel and attaches to the posterior of the prosthetic socket, rather than the distal end. The hypothesis is that the high-profile foot (i.e., the crossover foot) will lead to functional and biomechanical improvements compared to low-profile feet.
Typically people need separate prosthetic feet for running and walking. To bridge the gap, this study will test the Compliant Adaptive Energy Storage and Return (CAESAR) foot. This foot can change from a walk mode to a run mode with the push of a button. The investigators will test and improve this foot design mechanically, and then test this design on individuals with lower limb amputation in a lab setting. The goal of this project is to develop a passive prosthetic foot that can serve two purposes in someone's daily life: walking and running, to allow them to be more active.
This study will compare the use of RESCU [Experimental] Prosthesis with a [Standard] pattern recognition prosthesis in a clinical setting and in unsupervised daily activity. The protocol will follow a single case experimental design (SCED) to compensate for the limited size of the patient population. Each of the participants will use the Standard and Experimental and systems over a 35-day period. The Standard system will include at least two controllable DoFs (hand, wrist, multi-articulated hand, etc) and a commercially-available pattern recognition controller. The RESCU system will use the same components as the Standard system but will differ with respect to incorporating eight IBT Element Electrodes (as required for pattern recognition control) and the RESCU control software. The hypothesis is that pattern recognition will outperform the commercially-available control strategy for most participants on in-clinic, at-home usage, and subjective measures.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a robot-assisted biofeedback exercise program on grip strength, movement speed, coordination, functional status, depressive status, and quality of life in patients with a myoelectric prosthesis with upper limb amputation. In the literature review, There is no robot-assisted exercise program applied in patients using upper extremity myoelectric prosthesis. The expected benefit from this study is to show that the functional status, depressive status, and quality of life of the patients who received robot-assisted biofeedback exercise were better than those who had a home exercise program only.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the mobility, perceived safety and functioning of unilateral transfemoral (TF) amputees using the Rheo Knee XC compared to their existing prosthetic knee (RHEO KNEE II, III or Genium, X2 or X3) after 3 weeks of use. The primary objective of the study was to determine/investigate whether unilateral (TF) amputees can apply and benefit from the stair ascent function of the Rheo Knee XC and compare the stair ascent function and automatic cycling detection of the Rheo Knee XC to hydraulic microprocessor controlled knees (MPK-HY). The testing was conducted in a non-blinded, multicenter, prospective within subject comparison, with a subgroup analysis with Magneto-rheologic microprocessor controlled knees (MPK-MR) subgroup and MPK-HY subgroup comparing to the Rheo knee XC. A convenience sample of 15 transfemoral amputee users was recruited at 4 study sites. Inclusion criteria: - Cognitive ability to understand all instructions and questionnaires in the study; - Unilateral knee-disarticulated or transfemoral users fitted to Rheo Knee II,III or Genium - Willing and able to participate in the study and follow the protocol - Confident prosthetic users for more than 3 months - Older than 18 years Exclusion Criteria - Patients with the following characteristics are not eligible for study entry: - 50Kg> body weight > 136Kg - Users with cognitive impairment - Users not understanding the function of the knee - Users not able to charge the battery Testing was conducted between June and August 2015 in four US locations. Participants visited the study location twice, for approximately 3 hours per visit. First time for the baseline measure and initial fitting and secondly after 3 weeks of accommodation on the Rheo knee XC, performing the same measures as for the baseline. Measures included 6 minute walk test with Borg scale CR pre and post, L-test, stair assessment index, stair and bicycle evaluation and Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire mobility section (PEQ MS12/5) For statistics repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing baseline to 3 week follow up were performed.
The overall purpose of this project is to test the feasibility of a manual wheelchair propulsion program which aims to reduce the chance of development of upper limbs pain and injury.