View clinical trials related to Alveolar Bone Loss.
Filter by:early marginal bone loss around dental implants may hamper long term prognosis of implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. this study aimed to study the correlation of pico-coronal position of dental implant (from supracrestal, crystal to undergone level) measuring early marginal bone loss through periapical x-ray at surgical time and subsequent follow-ups.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the use of erythropoietin gel as an adjunct to xenograft in the surgical management of intrabony periodontal defects.
The aim of this trial is to compare the effect of autogenous demineralized dentin block graft (ADDBG) versus autogenous bone block graft (ABBG) harvested from maxillary tuberosity on alveolar ridge preservation after extraction of non-restorable single rooted teeth
The aim of this trial is to compare whole-tooth vs particulate dentin for their effects in alveolar ridge preservation.
Achieving prosthetically driven implant placement is a highly predictable treatment modality with reliable long-term results. Different surgical procedures have been used as a solution for reconstructing of the alveolar ridge with deficient volume. In the present study we demonstrate a modified alveolar ridge split technique for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation (buccal plate repositioning technique) using the piezotome surgery. Evaluation of the effect of silica-calcium phosphate nanocomposite (SCPC) graft material versus demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFBA) in horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation before implant insertion will be performed.
The aim of the present investigation will be evaluate the healing of periodontal intraosseous defects following Minimally Invasive Non Surgical Debridement (MINSD) and application of amelogenins, compared to MINSD alone. A total of 22 patients will be enrolled, selected by inclusion and exclusion criteria and randomly divided in two groups: amelogenin (A) and no-amelogenin group (B).
The bone grafting materials currently used in dentistry are autografts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic grafts. Among these different types of bone graft materials, autografts are considered to have the most predictable results due to its properties of osteogenesis, osteoinduction and osteoconduction. However, bone autografts are rarely used due to the high morbidity associated with harvesting the bone graft from the patient with a second surgical site. Because of the increased risk to the patient with autogenous bone grafts, the current standard of care is an allograft, which is a bone graft harvested from cadaver sources such as Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA). While allografts can only possess the qualities of osteoinduction and osteoconduction, they also have dramatically less morbidity due to the lack of a second surgical site. Studies have shown that autogenous dentin grafts promote all three ideal mechanisms for bone regeneration. There are two methods to generate autogenous dentin grafts. One is to collect the extracted tooth and to send it to a tooth bank for the preparation process. The second is to process the extracted tooth in a clinical setting chairside, for a graft. A dentin graft can undergo different treatments such as demineralization, mineralization, and partial-demineralization. Although the autogenous dentin graft has shown positive results for bone regeneration, the comparison between partial-demineralized, mineralized autogenous dentin grafts, and freeze-dried bone grafts in the clinical setting for immediate grafting has not been studied in humans. Thus, there is a need to study the benefits of autogenous dentin partial-demineralized and mineralized grafts versus freeze-dried bone allografts regarding clinical, radiographically (bone volume and density), and efficacy results. This research addresses these areas of need.
This study was conducted to clinically and radiographically evaluate locator RTx attachments for two implant-supported mandibular overdenture using two loading protocols
Periodontitis, a microbially-driven inflammatory disease has been shown to be the sixth most common disease of mankind. The 2009 UK Adult Dental Health Survey found that 54% of adults experience gum bleeding (gingivitis) with 45% of these suffering from periodontitis. Periodontitis begins at the gingival margins of teeth and over time, in susceptible individuals, the presence of a plaque biofilm can lead to the loss of the supporting connective tissue and alveolar bone associated with the teeth. This leads to the formation of a pathological periodontal pocket between the gingiva and tooth root, measurable by the use of a periodontal probe and recorded as the probing pocket depth (PPD). The associated loss of alveolar bone support is measurable radiographically and often leads to tooth mobility and if allowed to persist, can eventually lead to tooth loss. Periodontitis is classified into 4 stages (I-IV) based on disease severity and 3 grades (A-B-C) based on risk of disease progression. The treatment of periodontitis involves a non-specific reduction of the bacterial load below the gingival margin. This is achieved by effective oral hygiene procedures and non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT), both of which are aimed at the removal of calculus (tartar) deposits and the disruption of the plaque biofilm from the affected root surfaces. In some cases, this treatment may then be followed by more invasive treatments such as periodontal surgery and if successful, patients can then be followed and maintained with supportive periodontal maintenance therapy (SPT). It should be noted that certain periodontal lesions in some patients do not however always respond favourably to treatment.
This study aims to describe a new approach for the reconstruction of the alveolar process in the sinus area. This minimally invasive approach will access the maxillary sinus through the alveolar process, elevating the sinus membrane in the area immediately above it. The regeneration may be achieved in the specific area required for dental implant placement, reducing the morbidity of the procedure.