View clinical trials related to Allergy.
Filter by:This study aims to profile the siderophore-content in the human gut from allergic and non-allergic subjects and to assess their contribution in iron homeostasis.
The purpose of this study is to determine and compare the amount of study drug that gets into your blood after the administration of each of the three formulations of cetirizine under different conditions. Another objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of food on the amount of study drug that gets into your blood after the administration of the investigational formulation. Other objectives of this study are to determine the sensory experience and ease of swallowing the investigational formulation, as well as to determine the safety of test and reference formulations of cetirizine.
Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIEES) is a particular non-Immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy. A retrospective descriptive single-center study was conducted. Subjects included were children with acute FPIES who consulted the allergy department of the Nancy Regional University Hospital between November 2013 and June 2016.
Penicillin antibiotics are safe and inexpensive, and target selected bacteria rather than killing a broad range. Unfortunately, around 10% of the population are labelled as 'penicillin allergic'. This is often based on side effects such as rash and diarrhoea, and 90-95% of people with the label are not actually allergic to the drug. The label leads to the use of alternative antibiotics, which tend to more toxic, and less specific about which bacteria they kill; this increases the risk of infections with so-called 'super-bugs', compared to patients without the label. People with the label also have an increased length of hospital stay and rates of readmission. These are significant problems for individuals, as well as wider society. Where the diagnosis is in doubt, the gold standard test for allergy is an oral challenge. Patients undergo skin +/- blood tests prior to a challenge, as these can help make the diagnosis. This combined pathway is expensive and time consuming, so testing cannot be offered routinely to all patients. However in patients with 'historic' reactions (many years previously), skin and blood tests become much less useful; in one study, 100% of patients who skin tested positive for amoxycillin allergy, tested negative 5 years later. Patients with historic reactions can therefore proceed directly to an oral challenge without prior skin or blood testing, since these offer little help in making the diagnosis. This streamlines the pathway, making it quick, non-invasive and cheap. Already established practice in several centres in Europe and beyond, this abbreviated pathway is offered on an ad-hoc basis in some centres in the UK. The aim is to demonstrate that this pathway offers a safe and effective way to perform large-scale delabelling of elective surgical patients, who might not otherwise meet NICE criteria for testing.
The objective of this study is to investigate the potential of NeoMatriXTM Wound Matrix to cause an allergic response to healthy volunteers using a skin prick test.
Repeated insult patch test on healthy males and females to determine potential contact irritation or contact allergy in the skin
The study evaluates the safety and efficacy of intralymphatic allergen-specific immunotherapy given to adolescents and young adults who are allergic to grass or birch pollen and have mild or moderate asthma. Patients will be treated with three intralymphatic injections; 1000 SQ-U x3 with 4-5 weeks interval, or placebo with 4-5 weeks interval. The patients receiving treatment will be given a fourth injection one year after the initial injections. The study is conducted in collaboration between Professor Lars Olof Cardell (ENT), prof Gunilla Hedlin (Pediatrics) and prof Marianne van Hage (Immunology)".
A randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial of adding a short burst of corticosteroid to the conventional treatment of H1 antihistamines
Severity of allergic reactions are highly variable from one individual to another, they can range from absent to life threatening. Allergic manifestations and specifically those of anaphylactic reactions are generally attributed to an IgE-dependent activation of mast cells and/or basophils followed by the release of histamine. Recently however evidence accumulated that other pathways might similarly contribute or even trigger anaphylaxis. Moreover, while the variance in human populations is an important subject to scientific research, medical practices and public health policies typically take a 'one for all' approach to disease management and drug development. Indeed, individual heterogeneity in the immune response can have a big impact on the likelihood to respond to therapy. Because of the complexity of immune responses in the individual and within the population, it has not been possible thus far to define the parameters (genetic or environmental) that define the immune system of allergic patients and its natural occurring variability. Thanks to the efforts that have been made in the framework of the Labex "Milieu Intérieur" study genetic, immunological and environmental factors have been identified that can be linked to the heterogeneity of immune responses in healthy individuals. By comparing these already available data from healthy individuals to a novel cohort of patients with defined severe allergic manifestations, we will be able to identify for the first time immunological and environmental parameters that are common to patients with severe allergies and identify those parameters that distinguish allergic patients from the healthy donor cohort. This analysis will thus open new perspectives on deregulated immune pathways in allergic patients allowing to orient future treatment approaches. Furthermore, comparing immune responses before and after allergen-specific immunotherapy will help understanding, which changes in immune responses are causal to a successful treatment. Importantly, this analysis will shed light on the individual differences that may predict the outcome of treatment approaches and propose novel markers of its success.
This study is retrospective. It focuses on hazelnut allergic patients with a clinical history and a positive specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) against hazelnut and its recombinants that have followed a hazelnut oral tolerance induction at the allergy Unit of Saint Vincent Hospital of Lille (France) since 2011.