View clinical trials related to Airway Obstruction.
Filter by:Would patients using an anti-snoring appliance intraoperatively require less airway manipulation, interventions, and rescue maneuvers during anesthetic sedation cases compared to those who do not? The investigators will use anti-snoring appliance devices (specifically the FDA approved Zyppah) to attempt to relieve tissue obstructions that cause snoring during sleep. The application of the devices to the body is less invasive than other common intraoperative rescue airway devices (e.g. nasal trumpets and oral airways) which are not designed to be patient specific.
The Novapak study is a prospective, observational, multi-site, non-controlled, non-randomized, case-series, with a 2 week and 1-month follow-up in adults undergoing nasal/sinus surgery with Novapak Nasal Sinus Packing and Stent device used as indicated post-operatively and is being conducted to obtain clinical data on the safety and effectiveness of the Novapak device under use as intended in the device indications.
Nowadays, anesthetists may encounter many patients who are not diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) to undergo elective surgery. Recognition of these patients by anesthesiologists and taking necessary precautions will significantly reduce perioperative complications and mortality. STOP-BANG is a questionnaire used to predict high risk of OSAS. The aim of our study is to evaluate the clinical use of the oxygen reserve index as an early warning of possible desaturation in patients with low and high risk of OSAS according to the Stop Bang score.
We hypothesized that the accuracy of the modified cuff leak test in predicting re-intubation in tracheal intubated patients is better than that of the conventional balloon leak test, thereby further reducing the re-intubation rate.
The purpose of this study is to to compare oxygenation and ventilation on spontaneously ventilating obese patients or those with diagnosed or undiagnosed Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing day colonoscopy under Propofol based sedation, between the SuperNO2VA Et™ nasal positive airway pressure (PAP) device and routine care with face mask for oxygen (O2).
The standard for treatment for people suffering from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome involves the use of Continuous, or Automatic Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP, APAP) machines, which work by delivering air via tubing and mask to a patient at pressures of up to 20cmH2O. This increased pressure is meant to stabilize the airway to reduce obstruction events. APAP machines are generally more effective and more comfortable for patients than CPAP machines because these devices automatically adjust pressure to treat an apnea. However, this treatment is reactive and often ineffective since the necessary pressure is applied seconds after breathing has already stopped; The results of a previous study performed showed strong indications for predicting an apnea before it occurs using measurements collected by existing sensors of the CPAP and APAP machines. If apnea events can be predicted before they occur, the air pressure required to treat them could be supplied ahead of time, preventing the apnea from occurring. The hypothesis to be tested is whether obstructive sleep apnea events can be prevented, by predicting their onset ahead of time and adjusting the airway pressure accordingly.
Light to moderate sedation is recommended during surgery with spinal anesthesia . This study is exploring which sedation drug is better, midazolam or dexmedetomidine for transurethral resection of bladder and prostate in patients with or without high risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Patients were divided in two groups regarding OSA risk, and each group received midazolam or dexmedetomidine for sedation. Investigators observed intraoperative complications of airway and factors that are disturbing surgeon(movement due to participants coughing and restlessness) because one could puncture bladder or prostate and cause perforation.
This study compare the effects of Oral airway vs LMA in preventing anesthesia-induced partial airway obstruction, in an attempt to lessen MRI motion artifacts, which would result in improvements in image quality.
The purpose of this prospective pilot provider adoption study was to evaluate user experience a new airway device in adult patients with airway obstruction under deep sedation. Fifteen hospital systems served as testing sites. Fifty-four anaesthetist providers reported their experience with the airway device in 84 cases across two phases of surveying.
Effect of Self-Directed Versus Traditional Clinical Learning Model on Nurses' Airway Management Competencies and Patients' Airway Related Incidents Introduction Airway crisis situations in ICUs (Intensive Care Units) are common, complex, dynamic and time-sensitive contexts, that pose a significant threat to patient safety, and are a major source of preventable errors. Airway management has the highest priority in patient care, it is the first step in the (ABCDE) approach. The concept of Airway management in nursing perspective includes any nursing procedures and techniques required to keep the airway open and prevent aspiration. Adult learning is a practice in which adults engage in systematic and sustained learning activities in order to gain new forms of knowledge, skills or values. Most adult education is voluntary; therefore, the participants are generally self-motivated. Continuing education (CE) of nurses is increasingly necessary to keep abreast of rapid changes in patient care due to advancements in knowledge and technology and improve their ability to serve the patients safely. Although nursing care has been changed significantly over the past 30 years, methods for clinical training nurses have not. A popular or traditional model for clinical teaching of nurses, including but not limited to; integrating lectures, skills laboratory training and supervised clinical experience. A benefit of this model is the opportunity to assist nurses to integrate the concept learned in class or skill lab in patient care. Also, the instructor can select clinical activities that best meet nurses' needs and are consistent with hospital goals. While, Self-directed learning (SDL) is one of modern approaches of clinical learning, the concept of SDL originates from the Adult Learning Theory, it is a process in which the instructors play a facilitating role while, learners actively participate in identifying their own learning needs, learning goals, allocating resources & decide whether learning method can be used, and engaging in self-reflection & evaluation. The positive outcomes of SDL including but not limited to, greater self-control, self-confidence, autonomy, and lifelong learning skills. In essence the aim of this study will be examining the effect of Self-directed clinical learning model as compared to the traditional models to improve nurses' Airway management competencies and minimize airway related incidents. Research Hypothesis H1: Critically care nurses who will approach self-directed clinical learning model (μ1) will have a higher level of Airway management skills (μ2), (H1: μ1 > μ2). H1: Intensive care units who will approach self-directed clinical learning model to learn their working nurses (μ1) will have a lower frequency of patients' airway-related incidents (μ2), (H1: μ1 < μ2). Subjects and Methods True experimental, prospective, and comparative research design will be utilized in the current study. This study will be conducted at selected two Adult Intensive Care Units, A convenience sample of 60 male and female Critically Care Nurses who are working in the selected Intensive Care Unit, will be recruited to the study. The sample size estimated by (G Power analysis) (independent t tests - One tail, Effect size = 0.65, α = 0.05, Power (1-β) = 0.80, balanced allocation ratio 1:1). The total sample size will be divided into two groups (study and control). All nurses should be corresponded to specific inclusion criteria. Five tools will be formulated to collect data pertinent to the study. Procedure The study will be conducted through three phases; preparation & designation, implementation, and follow up & evaluation phase. The 1st Part will be initiated by allocating the selected ICUs randomly into two paired settings, one for applying traditional learning (control ICU) and the other for self-directed learning experimentation (study ICU). the nurses who are working in selected ICUs and correspond to the inclusion criteria, will be randomly distributed into two equal groups (30 nurses in each group). The nurses who are working in study ICU will be asked to fill out the nurses' readiness assessment sheet to learn independently. The nurses who will demonstrate a high readiness score (>80%) for independent learning will be included. Once implantation is complete, the follow-up and evaluation phase will be initiated by daily monitoring of the occurrence of patients' airway related incidents in both control and study ICUs for a continuous three months. Then, the nurses' knowledge and practices (in the control group) will be evaluated two times, 1st time will be 1 month after the implementation phase, and the second time will be after 3 months from the 1st evaluation (to measure the retention of given education and training). Upon completion of data collection, descriptive and inferential statistics will be utilized to test for differences among the study and control group subjects.