View clinical trials related to Advanced Breast Cancer.
Filter by:This is a phase II, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of organoid-guided treatment (OGT) to treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in previously treated, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The study will seek to provide evidence for utilizing patient-derived organoid (PDO) model to personalize treatment strategies and inform clinical care for advanced breast cancer. Subjects randomized to the OGT group will undergo PDO generation and receive treatment dictated by subsequent PDO drug sensitivity screening. Subjects randomized to the TPC group will receive empirical therapy as selected by the treating physician.
A multicenter, randomized, open-lable, single-dose, two-cycle, double-cross bioequivalence study comparing the pharmacokinetic profile of LY01612 (Doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome injection) and CAELYX® in Chinese subjects with advanced breast cancer
This clinical study includes a dose escalation trial of BEBT-209 monotherapy in HR +/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients and a Phase 1b trial of BEBT-209 as a single therapy, in combination with letrozole, and in combination with fulvestrant in ER +/HER2- advanced breast cancer in women. To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile, and preliminary efficacy of BEBT-209 as a single therapy, in combination with letrozole, and in combination with fulvestrant. To determine the recommended dose for late clinical studies of monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with HR +/HER2- advanced breast cancer.
IMPORTANT study is a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized-controlled, non-inferiority trial with a pragmatic approach involving older patients (≥ 70 years old) with advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, not amenable for curative treatment and without prior therapy for advanced disease, who are suitable to receive CDK 4/6-inhibitors plus endocrine therapy as first line therapy. The study implements two approaches with high level of evidence, namely the use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) approach in treatment decision making and the use of CDK 4/6-inhibitors as the initial treatment of choice, to investigate whether a common clinical practice (starting dose reduction of CDK 4/6-inhibitors in older patients) with evidence of low certainty can be standardized using a more individualized-based approach. On the basis of baseline CGA assessment, patients will either receive full dose of CDK 4/6-inhibitors plus endocrine therapy (if patients are fit according to CGA) or be randomized to full dose vs. reduced initial dose of CDK 4/6-inhibitors (if vulnerable or frail according to CGA). The study hypothesis is that adjusting the dose according to vulnerability will allow patients to tolerate treatment better without jeopardizing the treatment efficacy. This project has received funding from the European Union's HORIZON 2022 research and innovation actions supporting the implementation of the Mission on Cancer under grant agreement No 101104589.
This phase 3 clinical trial compares the safety and efficacy of palazestrant (OP-1250) to the standard-of-care options of fulvestrant or an aromatase inhibitor in women and men with breast cancer whose disease has advanced on one endocrine therapy in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
This is a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase II study to explore the efficacy and safety of Everolimus in combination with standard first-line endocrine therapy for the HR+/ HER2-SNF1 subtype of advanced breast cancer. The study was used to explore the efficacy of Everolimus in combination with standard endocrine therapy.
The purpose of this study is to learn if certain drug combinations are effective treatments for patients with advanced ER+/HER2- who have previously been treated with palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib.
The emerging paradigm of person-centered medicine has resulted in a change in the approach and management of health needs, and the introduction of new models and tools into clinical practice. One important change is the introduction of quality of life measurement (HRQoL). The tools used, however, remain anchored in a purely quantitative model, which does not enter the person's specific identity and emotional territory. The perception of quality of life is highly subjective, anchored in each person's needs and expectations (relative deprivation). The structured integration of the patient's point of view can be strengthened by the introduction of narrative medicine and qualitative methodologies, which enrich the point of view expressed in a standardized way, favoring person-centered care and not categories of patients. The National Chronicity Plan (2016) promotes the application of narrative medicine in clinical practice, aiming at the personalization of care: "the patient-person and his or her individual 'global' health project built through a personalized and shared 'Care Pact' that considers not only his or her clinical condition, but also the life context in which the disease is experienced". The current spread of digital tools in health care can facilitate the integration of qualitative and quantitative components through the use of dedicated platforms. In breast cancer patients with advanced disease, especially with triple-negative and HER2-negative biological subtype, oncological treatments include chemotherapy regimens, without or with target therapies and biological treatments combined with endocrinotherapy. For these patients, there is a need to improve treatment-related outcomes and overall quality of care and quality of life. To date, there is a lack of detection of subjective experience on an ongoing basis, which is the basis for personalization of care, and which may also have an impact on adherence to cancer treatment. The study aims to evaluate the introduction of the digital Person based Care (PbC) model designed by the project team. The model uses an online platform to integrate HRQoL quantitative data and qualitative narrative data for personalized care pathway based on the daily needs and existential project of the patient/caregiver.
To compare the efficacy and safety of capecitabine and cyclophosphamide (XC) versus physician's choice as maintenance therapy for patients with advanced breast cancer who achieved disease control after salvage treatment.
CDK4/6 inhibitors are currently the standard treatment for female breast cancer patients with HR+ tumors. However, there is no established standard treatment for patients who experience treatment failure with CDK4/6 inhibitors. The MAINTAIN study has shown clinical benefits by switching to Ribociclib and changing endocrine therapy after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors. We hypothesize that combining Dalpiciclib with physician-selected endocrine therapy, following treatment failure with CDK4/6 inhibitors, would similarly lead to improved patient survival. In this study, 18F-FES PET/CT will be employed as a non-invasive alternative to biopsy techniques for evaluating the expression of ER in various systemic lesions of the patients.