View clinical trials related to Adenocarcinoma.
Filter by:Phase I Study of NT-112, an autologous T-cell therapy product genetically engineered to express an HLA-C*08:02-restricted T cell receptor (TCR), targeting KRAS G12D mutant solid tumors.
BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is the sixth most common neoplasm in Spain. In the early stages (pT1-N0), the treatment of choice is transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Treatment may be expanded to radical surgery if there are poor prognostic factors for the presence of metastatic lymph nodes and a risk of recurrence (up to 29%). The most determining histopathological factor is the degree of submucosal invasion. There are different classical classifications to assess this invasion, which pose difficulties in establishing objective and reproducible measurements. Casalots et al. propose a new classification (Taulí-T1) based on the measurement of residual healthy submucosa (hrSB), hypothesizing that a greater amount of healthy submucosa correlates with a better prognosis. Results show less healthy submucosa in the recurrence group, with a trend towards statistical significance (p=0.09). OBJECTIVE: To compare the Taulí-T1 classification with conventional quantitative classifications (Kitajima, Ueno) and qualitative classifications (sm1, sm2, and sm3 by Kudo and Kikuchi). METHODOLOGY: A multicenter observational retrospective cohort study comparing the Taulí-T1 classification with classical classifications in 317 patients with stage pT1 rectal adenocarcinoma, following the STROBE guidelines. The main variable is the measurement of tumor invasion in µm through hrSB, compared to the invasion of quantitative (Kitajima and Ueno) and qualitative (Kudo and Kikuchi) classical classifications. Concordance will be assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient for quantitative variables and Cohen's weighted kappa for qualitative variables, with a 95% confidence interval and p<0.005.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new treatment combining radiation therapy with PCX12 is safe and tolerable.
This clinical trial studies how well a remotely delivered home-based exercise program for strength training works to positively impact endometrial cancer (EC) survivorship for patients with decreased cancer survivorship access. Cancer survivors in rural areas face barriers to supportive care, including geographic and environmental barriers to exercise and technology. Rural areas in the Midwest are underserved in terms of cancer care thus, it is essential to develop and test interventions that are scalable and can reach many individuals including those living in rural areas. Remotely-delivered exercise intervention approach allows for cancer survivors who may live far away from their primary treatment center to engage in supportive therapy via exercise interventions delivered in a sustainable context. In addition, historically black, hispanic and native endometrial cancer survivors have shorter survival and less access to survivorship care, so alternative models for healthcare delivery are needed in this underserved group. Information gained from this research may help determine whether utilizing a remotely delivered exercise program can positively impact EC survivorship for patients with decreased cancer survivorship access.
This is a FIH, ascending dose study to characterize the safety, tolerability, optimal dose and preliminary anti-tumor activity of IMM-6-415 in participants with advanced or metastatic solid tumors harboring RAS or RAF oncogenic mutations.
To find the recommended dose of the drug paclitaxel that can be given intraperitoneally (given directly into the abdominal cavity) to participants with metastatic appendiceal adenocarcinoma.
This phase I trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of FL118 in treating patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that may have spread from where it first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced). FL118 is a small anti-tumor molecule that inhibits the expression of multiple cancer-associated anti-apoptotic proteins. An anti-apoptotic protein is a protein that interferes with or inhibits cell death. In adults, apoptosis is used to rid the body of cells that have been damaged beyond repair. Apoptosis also plays a role in preventing cancer. If apoptosis is for some reason prevented, it can lead to uncontrolled cell production that can subsequently develop into a tumor. FL118 has been shown to inhibit or block the proteins that prevent damaged/mutated (genetically changed) cells from dying, and, by doing so, prevent the growth of cancerous cells and tumor development.
This study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, standard-of-care controlled phase III clinical study conducted in China. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ASKB589 plus CAPOX and PD-1 inhibitor compared with placebo plus CAPOX and PD-1 inhibitor (as first-line treatment) as measured by Progression Free Survival (PFS).
This is a multicenter, open-label, single arm phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Infigratinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC or GEJ patient with FGFR2 gene amplification, who have failed at least 2 lines of previous standard systemic treatment .
This phase III trial tests the side effects of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) compared to hypofractionated radiotherapy for treating patients with prostate adenocarcinoma that has come back after a period of improvement (recurrent) or that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to a limited number of sites (oligometastatic). SBRT is a type of external radiation therapy that uses special equipment to position a patient and precisely deliver radiation to tumors in the body (except the brain). The total dose of radiation is divided into smaller doses given over several days. This type of radiation therapy helps spare normal tissue. Hypofractionated radiation therapy delivers higher doses of radiation therapy over a shorter period of time and may kill more tumors cells and have fewer side effects. SBRT may work just as well as hypofractionated radiation therapy at treating patients with biochemically recurrent or oligometastatic prostate cancer, but with a shorter treatment time and possibly fewer side effects.