View clinical trials related to Acute Respiratory Failure.
Filter by:Critically ill patients experience a severe physical disease, associated with a psychotrauma, which may lead to post-traumatic stress disorder (17 to 30% of patients after critical illness) and persistent symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESIREA study will study psychodrama, resilience and factors associated with resilience in patients previously included in the NUTRIREA-3 randomized controlled trial designed to compare standard calorie and protein feeding complying with guidelines to low-calorie low-protein feeding in a well-defined group of severely ill ICU patients requiring at least MV and vasoactive drugs.
Assessment of the dynamics of changes in physical, instrumental and laboratory parameters in patients with identified coronavirus infection complicated by acute respiratory failure included in the study in accordance with the inclusion criteria, and comparison of the results with the control group, study of the effect of modes when using vibroacoustic lung therapy.
ASOP is a prospective cohort study comparing three methods for assessing risk of self-induced lung injury in patients with acute respiratory failure being managed with pressure-support ventilation. We will describe the relationship between three different assessment methods for risk of self-induced lung injury and compare them to a gold standard measurement.
Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been proposed as a rescue therapy in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The aim of this study is to determine whether combining TPE with convalescent plasma (CVP) transfusion early during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay, improves survival among this heterogeneous population.
In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), High Flow Nasal Therapy (HFNT) improves oxygenation, tolerance, and decrease work of breathing as compared to standard oxygen therapy by facemask. Current guidelines recommend adjusting oxygen flow rates to keep the oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) in the target range and avoid hypoxemia and hyperoxemia. The hypothesis of the study is that closed loop oxygen control increases the time spent within clinically targeted SpO2 ranges and decreases the time spent outside clinical target SpO2 ranges as compared to manual oxygen control in ICU patients treated with HFNT.
The aim of the study is to evaluate if a check-list including lung ultrasonography can help to identify the etiology of the acute respiratory failure of patients managed at the emergency room. Adult patients admitted to the emergency room for acute respiratory failure will be offered the study. The emergency physician will perform a systematic examination using a checklist, including pulmonary embolism prediction scores, structured clinical examination and lung ultrasound, in order to establish a diagnostic hypothesis. A diagnostic hypothesis will be made after completion of the checklist. The emergency physician can perform additional examinations and treatment after completion of the checklist. The final diagnosis will be checked by an adjudication committee which will have all the documents established during the emergency room consultation and any hospitalization following this hospitalization. The main outcome will be the concordance rate between the diagnosis after the check-list and the final diagnosis.
There are some criteria such as the most frequently used parameters to predict the failure of non-invasive mechanical ventilation, the APACHE 2 score, the presence of pneumonia and ARDS in the etiology, and no improvement in one hour of treatment. However, APECHE 2 score, which is the broadest of these criteria and includes others, is a complex scoring in which a large number of parameters are evaluated together, dependent on laboratory results and still leaves the final decision to the physician with a complete evaluation. In addition, the APACHE 2 score is a more commonly used method for intensive care patients rather than emergency patients who need a quick decision. Therefore, there is a need for a fast and practical method that can predict NIMV failure and determine early intubation decision in the management of patients admitted to the emergency department with acute dyspnea. Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) is a parameter calculated by dividing the respiratory rate by the tidal volume and is used to predict whether patients who are intubated in intensive care unit can be extubated successfully. The aim of this study is to evaluate the success of RSBI in predicting intubation and mortality in patients presented to the emergency department with acute respiratory failure and had NIMV indication.
Severe SARS-CoV-2 infections are frequently associated with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which leads to a mortality of 30-40%. An altered type I interferon (IFN) response has been demonstrated in patients with severe COVID-19, together with a high viral load. The aim of the current work is, in a large cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 admitted in the ICU, to determine the prevalence of patients with positive anti-IFN antibodies and to determine their outcome, as compared to patients having negative anti-IFN antibodies.
COVID-19 pneumonia can cause severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The usefulness of noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS), by means of nasal high-flow oxygen (NHFO), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or noninvasive ventilation (NIV), established outside the intensive care unit, is unknown. The aim of this multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal study is to compare the effectiveness of these treatments to prevent death or endotracheal intubation at day 28, and what factors, related to the disease or to the characteristics of the treatment itself, can condition its success or failure.
This study is a large pragmatic stepped-wedge trial of electronic health record (EHR)-based implementation strategies informed by behavioral economic principles to increase lung-protective ventilation (LPV) utilization among all mechanically ventilated (MV), adult patients. The study will compare the standard approach to managing MV across 12 study Intensive Care Units (ICUs) within University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS) versus interventions prompting physicians and respiratory therapists (RTs) to employ LPV settings promote LPV utilization among all MV patients.