Acute Myeloid Leukemia Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Single-Center Phase 1/2 Study of Single- or Fractioned-Dose Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Combination With G-CSF, Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone for Previously Untreated Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasm
Verified date | August 2023 |
Source | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dosing frequency of gemtuzumab ozogamicin when given in combination with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), cladribine, cytarabine and mitoxantrone (GCLAM) and to see how well they work in treating participants with acute myeloid leukemia or high-grade myeloid tumors (neoplasms) that have not been previously treated. Antibody-drug conjugates, such as gemtuzumab ozogamicin, act by directly delivering toxic chemotherapy to cancer cells. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor is a growth factor used to stimulate leukemia cells and render them more sensitive to chemotherapy drugs. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cladribine, cytarabine and mitoxantrone, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving gemtuzumab ozogamicin in combination with G-CSF, cladribine, cytarabine and mitoxantrone hydrochloride may work better in treating participants with acute myeloid leukemia or high-grade myeloid neoplasm.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 66 |
Est. completion date | November 1, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | July 1, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Diagnosis of untreated "high-grade" myeloid neoplasm (= 10% blasts in blood or bone marrow) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) other than acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with t(15;17)(q22;q12) or variants according to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification; outside diagnostic material is acceptable to establish diagnosis; submission of peripheral blood specimen for flow cytometry performed at the study institution should be considered; diagnostic material must have been submitted for cytogenetic and/or molecular testing as clinically appropriate - Medically fit, as defined by treatment-related mortality (TRM) score =13.1 calculated with simplified model - The use of hydroxyurea prior to study registration is allowed; patients with symptoms/signs of hyperleukocytosis or white blood cells (WBC) > 100,000/uL can be treated with leukapheresis or may receive up to 2 doses of cytarabine (up to 500 mg/m^2/dose) prior to enrollment - Patients may have received low-intensity treatment (e.g. azacitidine/decitabine, lenalidomide, growth factors) for antecedent low-grade myeloid neoplasm (i.e. < 10% blasts in blood and bone marrow) - Bilirubin = 2.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (IULN) unless elevation is thought to be due to hepatic infiltration by AML, Gilbert's syndrome, or hemolysis (assessed within 14 days prior to study day 0) - Serum creatinine = 2.0 mg/dL (assessed within 14 days prior to study day 0) - Left ventricular ejection fraction = 45%, assessed within 12 months prior to study day 0, e.g. by multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiography, or other appropriate diagnostic modality and no clinical evidence of congestive heart failure - Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception - Provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Myeloid blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), unless patient is not considered candidate for tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment - Concomitant illness associated with a likely survival of < 1 year - Active systemic fungal, bacterial, viral, or other infection, unless disease is under treatment with anti-microbials, and/or controlled or stable (e.g. if specific, effective therapy is not available/feasible or desired [e.g. known chronic viral hepatitis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)]); patient needs to be clinically stable as defined as being afebrile and hemodynamically stable for 24 hours; patients with fever thought to be likely secondary to leukemia are eligible - Known hypersensitivity to any study drug - Confirmed or suspected pregnancy or active breast feeding - Treatment with any other investigational anti-leukemia agent; in phase 2, treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with FLT3-mutated AML is permissible |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium | Seattle | Washington |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center | Pfizer |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) When Added to GCLAM (Phase 1) | Defined as the highest dose studied in which the incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) is =33% (=4 of 12 patients experiencing DLT), defined as any Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours that results in >7-day delay of the subsequent treatment cycle, with the exception of febrile neutropenia or infection or toxicities secondary to febrile neutropenia or infection, or any Grade =4 non-hematologic toxicity except febrile neutropenia/infection (or toxicities secondary to febrile neutropenia or infection) unless felt to be a direct consequence of treatment-related toxicity (e.g. intestinal infection following mucosal barrier breakdown), and with the exception of constitutional symptoms if recovery to Grade =2 within 14 days. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 will be used. | At time of count recovery, second cycle of treatment, response assessment or removal from protocol (at approximately 1 month). | |
Primary | Event-free Survival (EFS) Rate (Phase 2) | A two-stage design will be used to evaluate the EFS. Patients treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) from the phase 1 portion of the trial will be used in the phase 2 analysis. If censoring occurs, secondary analyses analyzing 6-month or 1-year EFS accounting for censoring will be done, including estimating 6-month or 1-year EFS using the Kaplan-Meier method. The first stage of the two-stage phase 2 design will evaluate 30 patients. If 20 or more of the first 30 patients are alive without event at 6-months after study registration, an additional 30 patients will be enrolled. If 46 or more of the 60 patients treated at the MTD are alive and without event at 6-months after study registration, the study will consider the regimen of interest for further investigation. Patients last known to be alive in CR were censored at date of last contact. | From the start of study treatment, assessed at 6 months and 1 year | |
Secondary | 30-day All-cause Mortality | As a summary of adverse events (captured on trial using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0), 30-day all cause mortality is reported as a percent of patients treated at the MTD/RP2D.
Will be estimated and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Regression models (logistic regression for binary endpoints, Cox regression for time-to-event endpoints [Cox models for the hazard of the subdistribution for events with competing risks]) will be used to compare outcomes with patients who have received GCLAM without GO at our institution, controlling for measured prognostic factors. |
Up to 5 years. 30-day all-cause mortality is reported | |
Secondary | Relapse-free Survival of GO3 Cohort | RFS was calculated for participants who achieved a complete remission (with or without count recovery; CR or CRi) and measured from the date remission to the first of relapse from CR/CRi or death from any cause. Patients last known to be alive in CR /CRi were censored at date of last contact. Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Time to relapse will be estimated using non-parametric estimates of the cumulative incidence curve with death analyzed as a competing event. Regression models (logistic regression for binary endpoints, Cox regression for time-to-event endpoints [Cox models for the hazard of the subdistribution for events with competing risks]) will be used to compare outcomes with patients who have received GCLAM without GO at our institution, controlling for measured prognostic factors. | Up to 5 years. 2-year RFS reported. | |
Secondary | Overall Survival | OS was calculated for all participants and measured from initial trial therapy to death from any cause. Patients last known ot be alive were censored at date of last contact. Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Regression models (logistic regression for binary endpoints, Cox regression for time-to-event endpoints [Cox models for the hazard of the subdistribution for events with competing risks]) will be used to compare outcomes with patients who have received GCLAM without GO at our institution, controlling for measured prognostic factors. | 3 years and 1 month | |
Secondary | Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Rates and Remission Rates: CR | Will be estimated and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Regression models (logistic regression for binary endpoints, Cox regression for time-to-event endpoints [Cox models for the hazard of the subdistribution for events with competing risks]) will be used to compare outcomes with patients who have received GCLAM without GO at our institution, controlling for measured prognostic factors.
Complete response (CR) rate is defined as the frequency of patients achieving CR, which is defined by the European LeukemiaNet 2017 guidelines as bone marrow blasts <5%; absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; ANC =1.0 x 109/L (1000/mL); platelet count =100 x 109/L. (100 000/mL). MRD negative (MRDneg) status is defined as negative for leukemic markers by multiparameter flow cytometry. Aplasia was defined as absence of tumoral cells but cellularity not meeting criteria for MLFS. Statistical significance tests were not performed. |
90 days | |
Secondary | Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) and Remission Rates: CRi (MRDneg) | Will be estimated and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Regression models (logistic regression for binary endpoints, Cox regression for time-to-event endpoints [Cox models for the hazard of the subdistribution for events with competing risks]) will be used to compare outcomes with patients who have received GCLAM without GO at our institution, controlling for measured prognostic factors.
Complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate is defined as the frequency of patients achieving CRi, which is defined by the European LeukemiaNet 2017 guidelines as all CR criteria except for residual neutropenia (ANC <1.0 x 109/L [1000/mL]) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 x 109/L [100,000/mL]). MRD negative (MRDneg) status is defined as negative for leukemic markers by multiparameter flow cytometry. Aplasia was defined as absence of tumoral cells but cellularity not meeting criteria for MLFS. Statistical significance tests were not performed. |
90 days | |
Secondary | Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) and Remission Rates: CR/CRi | Will be estimated and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Regression models (logistic regression for binary endpoints, Cox regression for time-to-event endpoints [Cox models for the hazard of the subdistribution for events with competing risks]) will be used to compare outcomes with patients who have received GCLAM without GO at our institution, controlling for measured prognostic factors.
Complete response (CR) + complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate is defined as the frequency of patients achieving CR or CRi per the European LeukemiaNet 2017 criteria as defined above. MRD negative (MRDneg) status is defined as negative for leukemic markers by multiparameter flow cytometry. Aplasia was defined as absence of tumoral cells but cellularity not meeting criteria for MLFS. Statistical significance tests were not performed. |
90 days | |
Secondary | Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) and Remission Rates: MLFS (MRDneg) | Will be estimated and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Regression models (logistic regression for binary endpoints, Cox regression for time-to-event endpoints [Cox models for the hazard of the subdistribution for events with competing risks]) will be used to compare outcomes with patients who have received GCLAM without GO at our institution, controlling for measured prognostic factors.
Morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS) rate is defined as the frequency of patients achieving MLFS, which is defined by the European LeukemiaNet guidelines as bone marrow blasts <5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; no hematologic recovery required. At least 200 cells should be enumerated or cellularity should be at least 10%. MRD negative (MRDneg) status is defined as negative for leukemic markers by multiparameter flow cytometry. Aplasia was defined as absence of tumoral cells but cellularity not meeting criteria for MLFS. Statistical significance |
90 days | |
Secondary | Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) and Remission Rates: Alapasia (MRDneg) | Will be estimated and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Regression models (logistic regression for binary endpoints, Cox regression for time-to-event endpoints [Cox models for the hazard of the subdistribution for events with competing risks]) will be used to compare outcomes with patients who have received GCLAM without GO at our institution, controlling for measured prognostic factors.
o Aplasia rate is defined in this protocol as frequency of patients without blood count recovery after chemotherapy and bone marrow examination showing hypocellularity not meeting cellularity criteria for morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS). MRD negative (MRDneg) status is defined as negative for leukemic markers by multiparameter flow cytometry. Aplasia was defined as absence of tumoral cells but cellularity not meeting criteria for MLFS. Statistical significance tests were not performed. |
90 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05400122 -
Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Combination With Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFbeta) Receptor I Inhibitor Vactosertib in Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04460235 -
Immunogenicity of an Anti-pneumococcal Combined Vaccination in Acute Leukemia or Lymphoma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03678493 -
A Study of FMT in Patients With AML Allo HSCT in Recipients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04022785 -
PLX51107 and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05424562 -
A Study to Assess Change in Disease State in Adult Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy Receiving Oral Venetoclax Tablets in Canada
|
||
Completed |
NCT03197714 -
Clinical Trial of OPB-111077 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT03224819 -
Study of Emerfetamab (AMG 673) in Adults With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04070768 -
Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) and Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory CD33+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia:Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-AML17-113
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03844048 -
An Extension Study of Venetoclax for Subjects Who Have Completed a Prior Venetoclax Clinical Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04107727 -
Trial to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy/Quizartinib vs Chemotherapy/Placebo in Adults FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 (FLT3) Wild-type Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04920500 -
Bioequivalence of Daunorubicin Cytarabine Liposomes in Naive AML Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04385290 -
Combination of Midostaurin and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in First-line Standard Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (MOSAIC)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03897127 -
Study of Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Intensive Chemotherapy With CPX-351 in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML and Intermediate- or Adverse Genetics
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04021368 -
RVU120 in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03665480 -
The Effect of G-CSF on MRD After Induction Therapy in Newly Diagnosed AML
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02485535 -
Selinexor in Treating Patients With Intermediate- and High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Transplant
|
Phase 1 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04093570 -
A Study for Participants Who Participated in Prior Clinical Studies of ASTX727 (Standard Dose), With a Food Effect Substudy at Select Study Centers
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04069208 -
IA14 Induction in Young Acute Myeloid Leukemia
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05744739 -
Tomivosertib in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04969601 -
Anti-Covid-19 Vaccine in Children With Acute Leukemia and Their Siblings
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |