Higher or Lower Dose Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone in Treating Medically Less Fit Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myeloid Neoplasm

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Clinical Trial

Official title:

Impact of Treatment Intensity on Survival, Quality of Life, and Resource Utilization in Medically Less Fit Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Analogous Myeloid Neoplasms: A Randomized Pilot Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03012672
• Other study ID #: 9759
• Secondary ID: NCI-2016-0205197
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 2
• Start date: December 30, 2016
• Est. completion date: February 26, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: February 2022
• Source: University of Washington
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This randomized pilot trial studies how well higher or lower dose cladribine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone work in treating medically less fit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or myeloid neoplasm. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cladribine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving cladribine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone at higher or lower dose may work better in treating patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

Description:

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the feasibility of randomizing medically less fit adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or analogous myeloid neoplasms to either intensive or non-intensive induction and post remission chemotherapy. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the attitude of patients and physicians toward randomization and explore reasons for treatment preference. II. To evaluate whether the ability to assess fitness for intensive chemotherapy can be improved by an augmented treatment-related mortality (TRM) score that includes additional (co-morbidity) factors, and to compare the ability of physicians and the prediction algorithm(s) to assess the likelihood of early death. III. To compare, within the limits of a pilot study, response, duration of response, and survival between patients receiving intensive and those receiving non-intensive chemotherapy. IV. To describe the impact of treatment intensity on quality of life of patients undergoing chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML. V. To describe the impact of treatment intensity on medical resource utilization and care cost of patients undergoing chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML. OUTLINE: Patients agreeable to randomization are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Patients not agreeable to randomization receive treatment based on their preference. ARM I (HIGHER-DOSE): INDUCTION: Patients receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) on days 0-5, higher dose cladribine intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on days 1-5, higher dose cytarabine IV over 2 hours on days 1-5, and higher dose mitoxantrone IV over 60 minutes on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 6 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. CONSOLIDATION: Patients who achieve complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) with up to 2 courses of Induction receive G-CSF, cladribine, and cytarabine as in Induction. Courses repeat every 6 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II (LOWER-DOSE): INDUCTION: Patients receive G-CSF SC on days 0-5, lower dose cladribine IV over 2 hours on days 1-5, lower dose cytarabine IV over 1 hour on days 1-5, and lower dose mitoxantrone IV over 60 minutes on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 6 weeks for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. CONSOLIDATION: Patients who achieve complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) with up to 6 courses of Induction receive G-CSF, cladribine, and cytarabine as in Induction. Courses repeat every 6 weeks for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for 5 years.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 50
• Est. completion date: February 26, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: December 10, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosis of untreated "high-grade" myeloid neoplasm (>= 10% myeloid blasts by morphology in bone marrow and/or peripheral blood) or AML other than acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with t(15;17)(q22;q12) or variants according to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification; patients with acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage are eligible; outside diagnostic material is acceptable as long as peripheral blood and/or bone marrow slides are reviewed at the study institution and cytogenetic/molecular information is available
• Treatment-related mortality (TRM) score >= 13.1 as calculated with simplified model
• The use of hydroxyurea before enrollment is permitted; hydroxyurea should be discontinued prior to start of study treatment. Patients with symptoms/signs of leukostasis, white blood cell (WBC) > 100,000/uL, or acute symptoms felt related to their high-grade myeloid neoplasm can be treated with leukapheresis or may receive up to 1 dose of cytarabine (up to 500 mg/m^2) anytime prior to study day 1
• Patients may have received treatment (e.g. azacitidine/decitabine, lenalidomide, growth factors) for antecedent low-grade myeloid neoplasm
• Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >= 45%, assessed within 3 months prior to registration, e.g. by multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiography, or other appropriate diagnostic modality
• Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception beginning at the signing of the consent until at least 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug
• Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

• Myeloid blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), unless patient is not considered candidate for tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment
• Concomitant illness associated with a likely survival of < 1 year
• Active systemic fungal, bacterial, viral, or other infection, unless disease is under treatment with anti-microbials and/or controlled or stable; patients with fever thought to be likely secondary to leukemia are eligible; known hypersensitivity to any study drug
• Known hypersensitivity to any study drug used in this trial
• Pregnancy or lactation
• Concurrent treatment with any other anti-leukemia agent

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage
• Acute Myeloid Leukemia
• Leukemia
• Leukemia, Myeloid
• Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
• Myeloid Neoplasm
• Neoplasms

Intervention

Drug:
• Cladribine
Given IV
• Cytarabine
Given IV

Biological:
• Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Given SC

Drug:
• Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride
Given IV

Other:
• Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
• Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium	Seattle	Washington

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Washington	National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Event-free Survival	Will be determined by peripheral blood count and bone marrow evaluation and categorized according to criteria recommended by International Working Groups.	Up to 5 years
Other	Medical Complications	Information on medical complications (e.g. need for intensive care unit (ICU) level care, length of ICU stay, neutropenic fever, documented infections, bleeding, reasons for hospitalization) will be collected from the medical records from the University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC) and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA).	Up to 5 years
Other	Medical Resource Utilization	Information on use of medical resources (e.g. platelet transfusions; days of IV antimicrobial therapy, total hospital length of stay) will be collected from the medical records from the University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC) and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA).	Up to 5 years
Other	Overall Survival	Will be assessed for all patients. Will be determined by peripheral blood count and bone marrow evaluation and categorized according to criteria recommended by International Working Groups.	Up to 5 years
Other	Quality of Life as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30	Will be measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30. Exploratory, descriptive, and observational methods will be used.	Up to 12 months
Other	Relapse-free Survival	Will be determined by peripheral blood count and bone marrow evaluation and categorized according to criteria recommended by International Working Groups.	Up to 5 years
Other	Response	The differences in anti-leukemic efficacy between patients treated with lower-intensity chemotherapy and those treated with higher-intensity chemotherapy will be estimated. Exploratory, descriptive, and observational methods will be used.	Up to 5 years
Other	Fitness for Intensive Chemotherapy as Measured by a Treatment-related Mortality (TRM) Score That Includes Additional Co-morbidity Factors	The ability of physicians and the prediction algorithm(s) to assess the likelihood of early death will be compared.	Up to 12 months
Other	Duration of Response	Will be evaluated.	Up to 5 years
Other	Care Costs	The costs associated with inpatient and outpatient management will be calculated using electronic billing information from the University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC) and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA). Costs will be converted from charges using departmental cost-to-charge ratios. Descriptive information identifying major cost drivers and total/subset costs per phase of treatment will be reported.	Up to 5 years
Other	Attitude of Patients Toward Randomization	Will be determined by a patient preference survey. Exploratory, descriptive, and observational methods will be used.	Up to 12 months
Primary	Feasibility Defined as Proportion of Patients Willing to be Randomized to Either Intensive or Non-intensive Induction and Post Remission Chemotherapy	Randomizing patients to either intensive or non-intensive induction and post remission chemotherapy will be considered feasible if the true proportion of patients willing to be randomized is 60% or higher.	At end of enrollment