View clinical trials related to Acute Lung Injury.
Filter by:To evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, PD, and clinical activity of Itolizumab in subjects with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by Infectious Pneumonia.
The goal of this study is to better understand in changes in lung compliance as indicated by driving pressure (a non-invasive marker) following changes in positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP; a standard of care ventilator parameter). The main question it aims to answer is: The time to stability of driving pressure after a change in PEEP is made Type of study: observational study participant population/health conditions Participants will undergo a "best PEEP trial" which is a standard intensive care intervention for patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. This involves changing the patient's PEEP and looking for response in driving pressure. This will be done in a more protocolized format and data will be collected.
PRactice of Ventilation and Adjunctive Therapies in COVID-19 Patients. An observational study of ventilation practice and adjunctive therapies in critically ill, invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients during the first and second surge of COVID-19 in the Netherlands.
BTI-203 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, Phase 2 proof-of-concept (POC) study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rhu-pGSN plus standard of care (SOC) in subjects with moderate-to-severe ARDS (P/F ratio ≤150) due to pneumonia or other infections. Potential subjects hospitalized with pneumonia or other infections are to be screened within 24 hours of diagnosis of ARDS.
Research question: Are the ventilatory variables related to mechanical power associated with the outcome of subjects who received mechanical ventilation (MV) for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) secondary to pneumonia (NMN) due to COVID-19?
A Phase 2a, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of ALT-100mAb in patients with moderate to severe ARDS.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effect of steroid therapy in patients with COVID-19 ARDS. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Differences between patients with COVID-19 ARDS before and after steroid treatment in BALF single cell landscape, as well as patients with different prognosis. - Differences between COVID-19 and non COVID-19 ARDS patients in BALF single cell landscape. Participants will Choose whether to use or not to utilize steroid treatment based on conditions.
The overall purpose of this protocol is to identify subacute sepsis-associated cardiac disease in pediatric patients with cancer by CMR and evaluate the CMR findings during their follow-up. This will help inform heart failure management decision making. Evidence of dysfunction or elevated T2 values may inform adjustment of afterload reduction and beta blocker administration, and elevated ECV findings will suggest the need for increased surveillance for diastolic dysfunction. Primary Objectives: (Feasibility Phase) To determine the feasibility of cardiac MRI without anesthesia in the immediate post-sepsis period in children with cancer. CMR scanning will be completed within 10 days of presentation - this will allow us to ensure that possible hemodynamic or respiratory instability and renal dysfunction has resolved prior to transport to the MRI scanner during the most acute phase of illness. (Completion Phase) To estimate the frequency of subacute sepsis-associated cardiac disease, including myocardial inflammation and dysfunction, in the post-acute phase (within 10 days of presentation) of severe sepsis in children with cancer
Acute Respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe condition in which protective ventilation is a critical point in its management. Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting can be challenging for clinicians and high PEEP has been associated with better outcome in moderate and severe ARDS. Recently, recruitment to inflation ratio and airway closure have been investigated in order to help PEEP adjustment. However, ventilatory maneuvers are performed with a low level of PEEP and therefore expose to derecruitment and oxygen desaturation. So far, the risk of oxygen desaturation has not been investigated and risk factors are unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of oxygen desaturation during ventilatory maneuvers at low level of PEEP in patients with moderate or severe ARDS
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is often complicated by Right Ventricular Dysfunction (RVD), and the incidence can be as high as 64%. The mechanism includes pulmonary vascular dysfunction and right heart systolic dysfunction. Pulmonary vascular dysfunction includes acute vascular inflammation, pulmonary vascular edema, thrombosis and pulmonary vascular remodeling. Alveolar collapse and over distension can also lead to increased pulmonary vascular resistance, Preventing the development of acute cor pulmonale in patients with acute respiratory distress. ARDS patients with RVD have a worse prognosis and a significantly increased risk of death, which is an independent risk factor for death in ARDS patients. Therefore, implementing a right heart-protective mechanical ventilation strategy may reduce the incidence of RVD. APRV is an inverse mechanical ventilation mode with transient pressure release under continuous positive airway pressure, which can effectively improve oxygenation and reduce ventilator-associated lung injury. However, its effect on right ventricular function is still controversial. Low tidal volume (LTV) is a mechanical ventilation strategy widely used in ARDS patients. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with LTV, APRV improved oxygenation more significantly, reduced the time of mechanical ventilation, and even had a tendency to improve the mortality of ARDS patients However, randomized controlled studies have shown that compared with LTV, APRV improves oxygenation more significantly and also increases the mean airway pressure. Therefore, some scholars speculate that APRV may increase the intrathoracic pressure, pulmonary circulatory resistance, and the risk of right heart dysfunction but this speculation is not supported by clinical research evidence. In addition, APRV may improve right ventricular function by correcting hypoxia and hypercapnia, promoting lung recruitment and reducing pulmonary circulation resistance. Therefore, it is very important to clarify this effect for whether APRV can be safely used and popularized in clinic.we aim to conduct a single-center randomized controlled study to further compare the effects of APRV and LTV on right ventricular function in patients with ARDS, pulmonary circulatory resistance (PVR) right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling (RV-PA coupling), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR).