View clinical trials related to Acute Lung Injury.
Filter by:Patients in end-stage cardiac failure and/or respiratory failure may be started on a rescue therapy known as Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). One of the major clinical questions is how to manage the ventilator when patients are on ECMO therapy. Ventilator Induced Lung Injury (VILI) can result from aggressive ventilation of the lung during critical illness. VILI and lung injury such as Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) can further increase the total body inflammation and stress, this is known as biotrauma. Biotrauma is one of the mechanisms that causes multi-organ failure in critically ill patients. One advantage of ECMO is the ability to greatly reduce the use of the ventilator and thus VILI by taking control of the patient's oxygenation and acid-base status. By minimizing VILI during ECMO we can reduce biotrauma and thus multi-organ failure. Since the optimal ventilator settings for ECMO patients are not known, we plan to study the impact of different ventilator settings during ECMO on patient's physiology and biomarkers of inflammation and injury.
Non-invasive ventilation can allow to avoid intubation and improve outcomes in moderate-to-severe COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress-syndrome (ARDS). Data on NIV parameters adjustment based on expanded respiratory and gas exchange monitoring in COVID-19 associated ARDS is limited. Appropriate adjustment of the inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) set as a point of the balance between minimal work of breathing (minimum point of W.Patrick scale for assessment of the accessory respiratory muscles and minimum diaphragm thickening fraction) and minimum tidal volume, and respiratory rate can decrease NIV failure in moderate-to-severe COVID-ARDS. The objective of the study is to evaluate the ability of non-invasive ventilation guided with expanded respiratory monitoring to decrease the intubation rate in in moderate-to-severe COVID-ARDS.
This study is a large pragmatic stepped-wedge trial of electronic health record (EHR)-based implementation strategies informed by behavioral economic principles to increase lung-protective ventilation (LPV) utilization among all mechanically ventilated (MV), adult patients. The study will compare the standard approach to managing MV across 12 study Intensive Care Units (ICUs) within University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS) versus interventions prompting physicians and respiratory therapists (RTs) to employ LPV settings promote LPV utilization among all MV patients.
This is a prospective observational study using a mobile study platform (app) that is designed for use on Android phones. Study participants will provide baseline demographic and medical information and report symptoms of respiratory infection on a weekly basis using the app. Participants will also report use of prevention techniques on the weekly survey. Mobility data will be collected passively using the sensors on the participant's smartphone, if the participant has granted the proper device permissions. The overall goals of the study are to track spread of coronavirus-like illness (CLI), influenza-like illness (ILI) and non-specific respiratory illness (NSRI) on a near-real time basis and identify specific behaviors associated with an increased or decreased risk of developing these conditions.
Bedside lung ultrasonography helps to obtain reliable clinical information about lung aeration, that has been categorized by means of the so-called lung ultrasound score (LUS). In critically ill adults, LUS has been related with the outcome both in patients with respiratory and some non-respiratory conditions. Pediatric studies about lung aeration have been done mainly on postoperative cardiac patients and infants with bronchiolitis. In this prospective, observational, multicenter, feasibility and diagnostic accuracy study, we will explore the degree of lung aeration impairment as a potential outcome predictor in critically ill children with a variety of underlying conditions. Children from 1 month to 18 years of age admitted to PICU will be recruited and LUS will be calculated at two time points: at 12 ± 6 hours and at 48-72 hours. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis will be performed in order to ascertain the outcome influence of clinical factors in general and LUS in particular.
This research aims to assess the use of an experimental and non-invasive procedure, Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC), as an adjunct therapy in attenuating severe COVID-19 disease. An excessive and counterproductive systemic inflammatory response is thought to be a major cause of severe disease and death in patients with COVID-19. Severe ICU cases frequently have markedly higher levels of inflammatory markers such as CRP, IL-6, IL and TNF-a; which is thought to be correlated with increasing disease severity. The relationship between dysregulated inflammatory processes and disease states such as acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are well understood. ALI is characterized by an acute exaggerated mononuclear/neutrophilic inflammatory response followed by progressive collagen deposition in the lung, and if severe enough, may progress to ARDS requiring ventilation.
A randomized, double blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel group, fixed dose, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glenzocimab in ARDS.
This expanded access protocol will provide access to the investigational product Zofin for patients in outpatient facilities infected with SARS-CoV-2 who have mild to moderate COVID-19, or who are judged by a healthcare provider to be at high risk of progression to moderate disease.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a form of acute lung injury of inflammatory origin, which represents a public health problem worldwide due to its prevalence, and its high mortality rate, close to 40%. Mechanical ventilation is a fundamental therapy to improve gas exchange, however, it can also induce further lung injury, a phenomenon known as ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). The limitation of tidal volume is the strategy that has shown the greatest decrease in mortality and is the cornerstone of protective ventilation. However, the respiratory rate, a fundamental parameter in the programming of the mechanical ventilator, has not been evaluated in most of the main clinical studies to date. Moreover, the natural clinical response to the use of a low tidal volume strategy is the increase in respiratory rate, which may harm the lung as it increases the energy applied to the lung parenchyma. The investigators hypothesize that the use of a lower respiratory rate, tolerating moderate hypercapnia, is associated with less VILI, measured by the release of proinflammatory mediators at the systemic level (biotrauma), compared to a conventional higher respiratory rate strategy in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. This effect is mediated by lower energy applied to the pulmonary parenchyma. To confirm this hypothesis the investigators propose a prospective cross-over clinical trial in 30 adult patients with ARDS in its acute phase, which will be randomized to two sequences of ventilation. Each period will last 12 hours, and respiratory rate (RR) will be set according to PaCO2 goal: 1) Low RR, PaCO2 60-70 mmHg; and 2) High RR, PaCO2 35-40 mmHg. Protective ventilation will be applied according to ICU standards under continuous sedation and neuromuscular blockade. Invasive systemic arterial pressure and extravascular lung water will be monitored through an arterial catheter (PICCO® system), and airway and esophageal pressures and hemodynamics continuously measured throughout the protocol. The main outcome will be Interleukin-6 in plasma. At baseline and at the end of each period blood samples will be taken for analysis, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and transthoracic echocardiography will be registered. After the protocol, patients will continue their management according to ICU standards.
This is a study in adults with severe breathing problems because of COVID-19. People who are in hospital on breathing support can participate in the study. The purpose of the study is to find out whether a medicine called alteplase helps people get better faster. The study has 2 parts. In the first part, participants are put into 3 groups by chance. Participants in 2 of the groups get 2 different doses of alteplase, in addition to standard treatment. Participants in the third group get standard treatment. In the second part of the study, participants are put into 2 groups by chance. One group gets alteplase and standard treatment. The other group gets only standard treatment. Alteplase is given as an infusion into a vein. In both study parts, treatments are given for 5 days. Doctors monitor patients and check whether their breathing problems improve. They compare results between the groups after 1 month. Participants are in the study for 3 months.