Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03636113 |
Other study ID # |
PRO17030459 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 11, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
January 31, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2021 |
Source |
University of Pittsburgh |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study is an observational study which seeks to examine a) the accuracy of the Clarity
Renal Monitoring System (Clarity RMS)® sensor kit at the bedside compared to manual urine
output monitoring, b) total time/effort per patient with and without the device, c) the ease
of use, clinical acceptance, and d) preliminary data on the detection of AKI using the
Clarity RMS® sensor kit compared to standard care
Description:
The majority of physiological parameters of the patient in a critical care setting today are
electronically monitored. Automation of these parameters not only reduces workload and human
error, but also may provide alarms and warnings when these parameters fall below a pre-set
range. Currently, urine output may be the most relevant physiological parameter that still
involves manual recordings in the critical care setting.
In 2004, The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI), a group of experts in kidney
dysfunction, proposed the RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury (AKI). They describe Risk,
Injury and Failure severity classes and Loss and End stage Kidney Disease outcome classes.
The severity grades are based on serum creatinine, urinary output or both. More recently the
Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) stages for kidney injury added smaller relative increases
in serum creatinine levels to classify patients at risk. Since the classification has been
proposed, tens of thousands of patients have been involved in studies validating the RIFLE
and AKIN criteria as a classification system for AKI. The 2012 Kidney Disease Improving
Global Outcomes (KDIGO) AKI clinical practice guideline published in 2012 adopted modified
RIFLE/AKIN criteria for classification of AKI. Studies using these criteria report kidney
injury in Intensive Care Units at incidences of 50-70%.
Serum creatinine is considered a gold standard for measurement of kidney function; however,
increases in its levels are seen only after there is approximately 50% loss of renal
function, hindering early and sensitive detection of kidney injury and thus appropriate
treatment. Many individual factors of the hospitalized patient can also interfere with the
accuracy of changes in levels of serum creatinine, making this a less than ideal marker for
kidney injury.
While urine output is an easily available biomarker of kidney function, only a small
percentage of current studies that incorporate RIFLE and AKIN criteria utilize urinary output
as a diagnostic criterion for AKI. Fluid overload has been shown to be a factor of increased
mortality and further AKI. Sodium and water overload are common complications of fluid
resuscitation, an initial treatment in many cases of AKI. Studies have shown that oliguria
for three or more days, and a higher percentage of days with fluid overload after an initial
AKI diagnosis is made, are two proven independent predictors for the development of sepsis
post-AKI. In a recent study of periods of oliguria as a predictor of higher mortality in
critically ill patients the authors note "treating urine flow as a continuous physiological
variable instead of an interval parameter that is currently a challenge to measure accurately
would provide more time points for the detection of AKI… in clinical practice, the hourly
urine flow provides more precision for risk assessment and establishes early time for
interventions." Current practice for measuring urine output in most hospitals worldwide
involves manual recording on an hourly basis at best, and often one or two times per shift.
It is essential to develop updated easy-to use- tools and systems for monitoring and managing
patient fluid balance, for prevention and treatment of acute kidney injury and for patient
survival. RenalSense has developed such a technology to enable online continuous monitoring
of urine output and kidney function.
The current standard of care for urine output monitoring is the "manual" urometer. This
approach is labor intensive, and prone to measurement error. An automated system would likely
improve accuracy and reduce work load.