View clinical trials related to Acute Kidney Injury.
Filter by:Prolonged, high intensity work in a hot environment results in significant strain on the body, known as heat strain. Heat strain in hot occupational settings such as agriculture, fire suppression, and military work can lead to ~20% of workers exceeding the glomerular filtration rate indicated thresholds for acute kidney injury (AKI). However, it is unclear whether these individuals truly experienced AKI or if these were normal, healthy physiologic responses. To better determine if AKI occurs in the staggering number of workers previously reported, AKI biomarkers are needed in addition to kidney function markers (e.g., glomerular filtration rate) to characterize this response. The product of urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) is a promising Food and Drug Administration approved biomarker indicating risk of AKI and is currently used in hospitalized individuals. The usefulness of this biomarker in determining AKI in healthy individuals during heat strain is now beginning to be understood. Consecutive days of heat strain can result in repeated AKI, which is hypothesized to lead to chronic kidney disease. There is an epidemic of chronic kidney disease of non-traditional causes occurring in workers who undergo repeated days heat strain, including approximately 15% of outdoor workers in Central America. Of the few studies that investigated consecutive days of work in the heat, we demonstrated that participants exceed the glomerular filtration rate indicated threshold for AKI during consecutive days of heat strain. This project will determine whether [TIMP-2 x IGFBP7] increases during occupational relevant heat exposures in a healthy, active population. Additionally, this project will compare the impact of repeated exposures to a hot environment on risk of AKI.
A phase 1 study investigating the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of caffeine citrate in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy receiving therapeutic hypothermia. This study is an essential first step to develop caffeine as a kidney protective medication in this in this vulnerable group of newborns.
Patients undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) are exposed to the risk of suffering from a damage to the kidneys which goes under the name of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury (CA-AKI), which is more common if the subject has advanced heart or kidney disease. Up to 1 high risk patient in 3 can suffer from CA-AKI. Impella is a pump which sustain the heart in the course of PCI in high risk individuals. Incidentally, Impella was shown to also reduce the incidence of CA-AKI. The reason why Impella protects the kidneys is not currently known. The investigators aim at understanding it through measurements of kidney blood flow and metabolism.
The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using smaller doses of contrast dye that are validated as being at low risk of causing injury to the kidneys, with the larger doses that are traditionally used contemporary practice.
Risk of contrast-induced kidney injury is expected to be strongly correlated with exposure time. Studies on the excretion of iodinated contrast material are few and have mostly been carried out in patients with normal renal function. Although case wise reports of persistent renograms have been published, it is not known how long contrast is retained before excretion in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2, nor which of these patients are most susceptible to contrast retention. The current observational study aims to compare contrast elimination time and % contrast excretion in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2, to matched patients (for age, sex and contrast procedure type) with eGFR 30-59 and eGFR >=60 mL/min/1.73m2.
Intravascular iodinated contrast administration has become crucial to modern medicine. Currently it is estimated that over 250 million injections are given each year worldwide during medical scans and interventions. An acute predefined increase in serum creatinine is considered an indicator of acute kidney injury (AKI). When such an acute increase in serum creatinine occurs within 5 days post-contrast in absence of another aetiology, it is assumed to be iodinated contrast administration induced acute kidney injury. For over 50 years now, acute kidney injury caused by intravascular administration of iodinated contrast material has been considered a leading cause of hospital-acquired renal failure. Contrast has been withheld in fear of kidney injury with misdiagnoses and delayed appropriate patient management as a result. Since 2018, it is now widely accepted that only patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 are at risk of renal injury after intravascular iodinated contrast material injection. However, no study to date has been able to distinguish acute kidney injury caused by iodinated contrast administration from that for which no causal link is established, and it is unsure a causal relationship exists. There are several studies, in attempts to evaluate the causal relationship between contrast exposure and nephrotoxicity, that found fluctuations in absence of contrast similar to those considered to be contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Similarly, it is unsure whether longer-term negative outcomes are inherent to the population studied or a result of contrast administration. However, most of these studies are observational and retrospective in nature. The issue with retrospective studies is that they often cannot control for confounders and therefore cannot give us causation, only association. On the other hand, prospective randomized controlled trials comparing intravascular iodinated contrast administration to no contrast are unlikely given evident ethical issues. The current prospective observational study proposes to use intra-patient comparisons of peak change in renal function during periods in absence of- and with contrast to elucidate the relationship between renal function and contrast administration in this population.
Point-of-care (POC) creatinine devices allow rapid measurement of creatinine levels and calculation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) which give an indication of renal function. The focus of this assessment is to validate POC measurements to assess kidney function before intravascular iodinated contrast administration in patients with severe renal insufficiency (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2). It will be evaluated whether discrepancies between POC measurement values and values obtained from standard laboratory assays lie within an acceptable range using Bland-Altman analysis.
The purpose of this study is to find out if a drug called valproic acid (VPA) will protect organs (like the kidneys) from harmful effects caused by the temporary drop and then rise of blood flow and oxygen (called ischemia reperfusion (I/R) injury that sometimes happens during liver transplant surgery. VPA is an approved drug for treating conditions such as seizures and migraines for many years. However, it is not approved for use at the higher dose that will be used in this study or for protecting organs from I/R injury. This study will enroll liver transplant patients and randomly assign them to receive either VPA diluted in salt water or salt water without VPA (placebo) and then follow the patients and compare their organ function and overall outcome. This study is masked meaning that the patients, doctors, and nurses will not know which patient received which treatment. The study treatment will be given in addition to the care that liver transplant patients normally receive. The researchers doing this study believe that VPA will lessen organ injury caused by I/R, meaning that patients who receive VPA will experience less kidney injury when compared to patients who receive the placebo.
The purpose of this study is to find out if a drug called valproic acid (VPA) will protect organs (such as the kidneys) from damage when a person is injured and loses a large amount of blood. The organs may not get enough blood or oxygen when a patient loses a lot of blood. After the patient receives fluids such as blood, plasma, or saline and the bleeding is stopped, blood and oxygen return to the organs. This process called ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) is known to cause injury to organs such as the kidneys and heart. VPA is an approved drug for treating conditions like seizures and migraines for many years. However, it is not approved for use at the higher dose that will be used in this study or for protecting organs from I/R injury. This study will enroll trauma patients and randomly assign them to receive either VPA diluted in salt water or salt water without VPA (placebo) and then follow the patients and compare their organ function and overall outcome. This study is masked meaning that the patients, doctors, and nurses will not know which patient received which treatment. The study treatment will be given in addition to the care that trauma patients normally receive to treat their injuries. The researchers doing this study believe that VPA will lessen organ injury caused by I/R, meaning that patients who receive VPA will experience less kidney injury when compared to patients who receive the placebo.
Acute kidney injury increases the risk for chronic kidney disease, length of stay, readmissions and mortality. Currently the only way to diagnose acute kidney injury is with a serum creatinine or drop in urine output. Biomarkers for acute kidney injury are well elevated before rise in creatinine. Hypothesis is that by implementing an electronic alert system with an algorithm followed by remote ischemic preconditioning will prevent acute kidney injury.