View clinical trials related to Acute Diverticulitis.
Filter by:This study will include data collected from surgical units performing emergency surgery in Italy during 2024, with a one-year follow-up period for each patient. Data for each center will be prospectively collected through a database filled out by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) members who participate to the study. Specific data will include: WSES diverticulitis classification, procedure timing, laparoscopic/converted procedures, rate of performed protection ileostomies or colostomies, rate and timing of Hartmann reversal or stoma closure, procedures with more than two operators, procedures with expert first operator, night or weekend procedures, and patients aged over 80. Postoperative data will focus on complication rates and mortality at one, six, and twelve months.
In Europe, patients with acute left colon diverticulitis (ALCD) are usually admitted to surgical wards even when only medical treatment is required. The study compares ALCD non-operative management (NOM) between surgical and non-surgical environments regarding clinical outcomes, hospitalization length(LOS), and follow-up.
It is estimated that approximately 15% to 20% of the subjects with sigmoid diverticulosis will develop acute diverticulitis, with diverticular abscess as the most common complication of sigmoid diverticulitis. While cases with free perforations and diffuse peritonitis require emergency surgery, in cases with contained perforation and abscess formation, the approach is initially conservative. Due to its relative rarity, the treatment of diverticular abscess is not based on high-quality scientific evidence. Abscess size of 4-6 cm is generally accepted as reasonable cutoff determining the choice of treatment between antibiotic therapy and antibiotic therapy plus percutaneous drainage of the abscess. A subgroup of patients will fail the conservative approach and require a surgical rescue strategy. However, the real incidence for conservative treatment failure after non-operative management of acute diverticulitis with abscess remain poorly understood, the knowledge of which could improve decision-making processes, treatment strategies, patient counseling, and even modify the planned treatment strategy in patients deemed at highest risk. The early recognition of patients who show clinical signs of ongoing and worsening intra-abdominal sepsis due to perforation is important to ensure the success of this strategy. In the light of these, knowledge of risk predictors for failure is of utmost importance. Owing the contrasting evidence summary, we set up a multicenter retrospective cohort study that merges the cases from twelve high-volume centers for emergency surgery in Italy to assess the short-term outcomes of initial non-surgical treatment strategies for AD with abscess formation (Hinchey Ib and II) in a large number of patients, and identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes, to help facilitate appropriate patient selection and assess the optimal treatment strategy for this peculiar subgroup of patients. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence and risk factors for conservative treatment (antibiotics alone or antibiotics plus percutaneous drainage) failure after non-operative management of acute diverticulitis with abscess using a large multicenter patient series. The present study is designed as a multicenter retrospective observational study conducted at twelve secondary and tertiary Italian teaching surgical centers on CT-diagnosed hemodynamically stable patients (≥18 years) with perforated acute diverticulitis with abscess (with or without extraluminal air) initially treated non-surgically. The rate of failure of non-operative treatment for complicated acute diverticulitis patients with abscess formation and the risk factors of failure of the non-surgical treatment will be assessed. Failure of the conservative treatment is defined as lack of clinical improvement in the general conditions of the patient during index hospital admission, requiring urgent surgery to treat intra-abdominal sepsis.
Acute colonic diverticulitis is when a part of the colon gets swollen and inflamed. The diagnosis is based on a CT scan, which can show thickening of the colonic walls and infiltration of the diverticula. These changes and the concomitant symptoms can overlap with colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, the guidelines suggest that people with diverticulitis should be offered a colonoscopy to ensure, that CRC is not the underlying cause of the changes and symptoms. In Denmark, a lot of people get hospitalized each year due to diverticulitis, and many of them end up having colonoscopies with the purpose of excluding CRC. Currently, there are no methods for guiding colonoscopies following a diverticulitis episode, resulting in numerous unnecessary colonoscopies each year. In the Diverticulitis study, we want to investigate if a simple blood test analyzed for the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), can help us decide who needs a colonoscopy. We will collect blood samples from 220 people with diverticulitis and categorize them into ctDNA positive and negative groups. The ctDNA category will be compared to the colonoscopy results to see if there is a correlation between being ctDNA positive and having a CRC diagnosed at the colonoscopy. This study could change clinical practice since we anticipate that ctDNA-guided triaging of diverticulitis patients is a cost-effective strategy for selecting diverticulitis patients needing colonoscopy, ensuring detection of the underlying CRC, and significantly reducing the number of patients undergoing unnecessary colonoscopy.
Acute diverticulitis (AD) is the most common complication of diverticulosis and is divided into mild-moderate and complicated. Imaging methods are needed for its diagnosis, prognostic classification and therapeutic management. Currently the "gold-standard" imaging technique is computed tomography (CT) and most guidelines recommend it to classify and identify those patients with risk of treatment failure. In this styudy, a prospective comparison of CT and abdominal ultrasound is proposed, with the aim of evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound. An accurate ultrasound classification of AD would allow the differentiation of mild-moderate and complicated DA, avoiding routine CT and, therefore, patient's x-ray exposure.
The incidence of acute diverticulitis (AD), conservative vs. surgical treatment and outcome of patients are studied using national registries and patient charts from two hospitals between years 2009-19.
Approximately 1 in 500 pregnant women require non-obstetric surgery. Surgical care for the pregnant woman raises concern for complications adversely affecting pregnancy outcomes. The most common reason for surgery is acute appendicitis followed by gallbladder disease. Despite the common incidence of non-obstetric surgery among pregnant women, little is known regarding fetal outcome and the impact of laparoscopic interventions versus traditional open procedures. Even less is known about the role of non-operative management of general surgical disease in the pregnant population. However, fetal outcome is not compromised by emergency general surgery condition interventions.
Introduction: Various biomarkers have been studied to predict the severity of acute diverticulitis (AD), such as the leukocyte count and CRP, which are useful but lack sufficient sensitivity. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been identified as a new inflammatory biomarker in several abdominal pathologies. However, few studies determine its association with the severity of AD. The objective of the present study was to determine the utility and diagnostic precision of NLR in complicated acute diverticulitis (cAD). Material and methods: Descriptive, retrospective and analytical study. Patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of AD were included, from 2013 - 2018. Demographic variables, days of hospitalization, leukocyte count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, ESR, CRP, and NLR were analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of cAD were determined using ROC curves.
Even though Hinchey classification requires operative intervention, yet remains the established and most universally used scoring system for acute diverticulitis. Several other classifications have been described. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) developed a severity scale for surgical conditions, including diverticulitis. The same was done by the World Society of Emergency Surgery, that proposed a specific classification mainly based on the CT scan findings. This is a pilot study to compare the AAST and WSES classifications for acute colonic diverticulitis with the traditional Hinchey classification. We hypothesize that all the classifications are equivalent one each other in predicting outcomes
MAIN OBJECTIVE: Description of predicted markers of acute diverticulitis crisis, using bivariate and multivariate analyses. Analysis of acute diverticulitis predictor swings. SIDE OBJECTIVES: Descriptive analysis of HRQL in the different measurement periods to establish the evolution of the disease. Correlate HRQL values of systemic and local inflammatory markers in the diverticulitis group. Sub-analysis of patients with immunosuppression to evaluate disease virulence compared to a group of patients without immunosuppression. STUDY TYPE: Clinical, observational, prospective and multicenter study (8 hospitals) with three study groups: patients diagnosed with acute diverticulitis attending emergencies, diverticulosis patients and patients without diverticulums. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Age > 18years and radiological diagnosis by abdominal CT acute diverticulitis. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Rejection of the patient -severe diverticulitis requiring urgent surgery -an inability to understand HRQL questionnaire - IBD - pregnancy or breastfeeding - acute diverticulitis within the prior year of the study - Roma IV criteria fulfilment. VARIABLES: Main variables: local and systemic inflammatory markers- faecal calprotectin. Secondary variables: recurrence of acute diverticulitis -the persistence of symptoms - SF 12 and GIQLI questionnaires. STATISTICS: Sample size: alpha error 0.05; beta error 0.20; bilateral; proportion 0.9 in the control group; 500 subjects group diverticulitis, 200 group diverticulosis and not diverticulums.