Electronic Feedback for Data Restitution and Valorization to the Emergency Teams in Aquitaine. — FERVEUR  

Acute Coronary Syndrome Clinical Trial

Official title: Electronic Feedback for the Restitution and Valorization of Data on the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome With ST Segment Elevation in Aquitaine to Emergency Teams

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

ST+ Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of mortality, morbidity and healthcare costs in Europe and France. Emergency trans-luminal angioplasty (TLA), the gold standard treatment, is the major determinant of vital prognosis and functional recovery of patients with ST+ ACS. However, data from surveys and French practice registers highlight frequent deviations from the recommendations at different stages of the procedure; in the pre-hospital phase these malfunctions result in longer delays. Improving the quality of care for patients with ST+ ACS, and in particular improving compliance with recommended delays in the acute phase, is a public health priority in France. Feedback has been identified as one of the most effective interventions to improve practices and organisations in healthcare institutions. Feedbacks are defined as "any summary of a care performance over a given period of time that can be transmitted a posteriori to the health professional in any form, whether written, oral or by computer (in this case called e-feedbacks)". Feedbacks, by objectifying the level of individual and collective performance, encourage recipients to modify their practices and organisations to improve their performance. It also acts as a social pressure mechanism. While the minimum elements of feedback have been identified in the literature, there is a lack of information about the optimal operational modalities for their deployment, which limits the system's capacity to implement them. To overcome this lack of information, there is a consensus in the scientific community that research on feedback should focus not only on analysing its effectiveness, but above all on the determinants of its effectiveness. With regard to the quality of management of patients with ST+ ACS, only four trials were found in the literature that studied the effectiveness of feedbacks; none of them defined the optimal intervention for deploying feedbacks in the emergency department setting. Practice registers, particularly in the cardiovascular field, have shown their effectiveness in improving practices, particularly through the implementation of feedback to practitioners, who produce data. In 2012, the ARS Aquitaine set up two regional cardiovascular registers constituting permanent, nominative, continuous and exhaustive records of the management of patients suffering from coronary pathologies: the Aquitaine Interventional Cardiology Register (ACIRA) and the Aquitaine Register of Initial Management of Myocardial Infarction (REANIM). The cross-referencing of the REANIM and ACIRA registers constitutes an exhaustive cohort of patients with ST+ ACS containing information on the management of the entire care pathway, from the onset of symptoms to the end of the hospitalization for the management of the acute episode. This cohort, which is unique in France in the field of coronary pathologies, makes it possible to produce unprecedented and highly accurate information, particularly concerning the time taken to provide care. Wishing to actively engage in a process of changing practices, the Aquitaine Cardiovascular Registries team has developed an e-feedback tool for emergency, EMS and cardiology teams. This tool alone cannot contribute to effectively improving patient care. It is necessary to build an intervention for the deployment of this tool that takes into account the scientific data and the organisational constraints of care. Secondly, the evaluation of the effectiveness and economic impact of this e-feedbacks tool deployment intervention will allow us to know its real added value on practices, organisations and health care expenditure.

Clinical Trial Description

The study has two phases: - A phase of construction of the intervention based on qualitative analyses of the focus groups near the professionals of the establishments of the 7 zones SAMU concerned and semi-directive interviews near the directions of the establishments of the 7 zones SAMU concerned; - A phase of evaluation of the impact of the intervention which is based on a mixed method mixing quantitative and qualitative analyses. The qualitative analyses are based on semi-directive interviews with the professionals concerned in the establishments of the 7 participating UAS zones. The study design of the quantitative part is a cluster randomised controlled trial in a transverse stepped wedge design. The clusters are represented by 7 UAS zones of the ex-Aquitaine region. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acute Coronary Syndrome
• Emergencies
• Syndrome

• NCT number: NCT04852146
• Study type: Observational
• Source: University Hospital, Bordeaux
• Contact: Catherine PRADEAU, Dr
• Phone: 5 57 82 04 14
• Email: catherine.pradeau@chu-bordeaux.fr
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Start date: September 2022
• Completion date: January 2025