Acute Appendicitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in Adults: A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial
Laparoscopic (key-hole) appendicectomy is a minimally invasive procedure when compared to
open large bowel resection, but is still associated with a significant amount of pain and
discomfort. Analgesia is commonly provided by a multi-modal technique involving varying
combinations of paracetamol, Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), regional
analgesia and oral or parenteral opioids. Opioids are associated with an increased incidence
of nausea, vomiting and sedation which can complicate post-operative recovery. Different
techniques of intraoperative infiltration of local anaesthetic to control postoperative pain
are also being used. Their perceived benefits are thought to relate to reduced opioid
consumption and therefore reduced opioid side effects.
Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a technique which numbs the nerves carrying pain
sensation from the abdominal wall and provides effective and safe analgesia with minimal
systemic side effects. Their perceived benefits are thought to relate to reduced opioid
consumption and therefore reduced opioid side effects. The investigators believe ultrasound
guided TAP blocks will reduce pain and morphine consumption with a resultant improved patient
satisfaction, a reduction in post-operative nausea and vomiting and earlier hospital
discharge.
The key research question the investigators are trying to answer is whether TAP block provide
better pain relief than local anaesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites. Both
techniques are currently being used in the investigator's hospital.
Summary of Study Design: The study will be a double blind randomised controlled trial with
patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy randomly allocated into two groups. The study
group will receive bilateral TAP blocks and the control group will receive local anaesthetic
infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites
A double blind design was chosen to eliminate patient and observer bias in reporting of pain
scores.
The presence of the control arm will ensure that any difference observed will be due to the
effect of sensory nerve block due to the TAP block than due to the systemic effect of the
injected local anaesthetic.
The null hypothesis will be that there is no difference between the groups in the amount of
opioids consumed by the patients during 24 hours after the operation. The investigators chose
this measurement as an objective but indirect measurement of efficacy of TAP block and pain
relief thus received. Measurement of pain with various scoring methods are reliable only when
concurrent reduction in consumption of pain killers are demonstrated.
Recruitment and randomisation:
All patients meeting the inclusion criteria will receive a patient information leaflet about
the study during the procedure and investigators will gain informed consent during the
procedure consultation. Investigators aim to recruit 288 patients with 144 patients in each
group.
Informed consent will be taken the evening before, or on the morning of, surgery. Patients
will then be randomly allocated into either the study group or a control group. Randomisation
will occur by using computer generated random numbers using the block randomisation method.
Group allocation will be kept in a consecutively numbered, opaque, sealed envelope in the
controlled drugs cupboard in theatre-4/emergency theatre anaesthetic room of the John
Radcliffe Hospital. Once the patient has consented, the anaesthetist will open the
corresponding numbered envelope and perform bilateral TAP blocks after induction of general
anaesthesia if the patient is in the study group. The surgeons will infiltrate the port sites
with local anaesthetic at the end of the procedure if the patient is in the control group.
Blinding:
The study group will receive bilateral TAP blocks with 20mls 0.25% bupivacaine on each side
and the skin punctures on either sides will be covered with a small plaster. Patients in the
control group will receive subcutaneous infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites and
specimen extraction site with equivalent amount bupivacaine at the end of the procedure and
small plasters will be stuck on either flanks approximately where the skin punctures for TAP
block will be made.
The assessor of pain scores and morphine doses (Recovery nurse, Ward Nursing Staff & SEU
Foundation Doctor) and the patient will be blinded to group allocation.
Patient: Plasters will be stuck on flanks of all the patients, both study and control group,
so that patient will not know if they have received TAP block.
Recovery nurse: During handover to recovery the anaesthetist and scrub nurse will not mention
group allocation.
SEU Foundation Doctor: The foundation doctor who will be following up patients on the ward
will not be present in the operating theatre, ensuring that they are blinded to the technique
used.
The study duration will be from induction of anaesthesia until the patients are medically fit
for discharge from hospital. No extra visits other than routinely required for the surgical
procedure are expected.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01697059 -
Initial Antibiotics and Delayed Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04649996 -
Variation in Acute Appendicitis During COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy
|
||
Completed |
NCT04387370 -
The Use of the Hem-o-lok Clip in Appendectomy: Single or Double?
|
||
Completed |
NCT04030741 -
Non-operative Treatment of Acute Non-perforated Appendicitis
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04860570 -
Are Double-ring Wound-edge Protectors Effective for Preventing Superficial Surgical Site Infection After Open Appendectomy?
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT05724628 -
Non-operative vs. Operative Management of Acute Appendicitis in Vulnerable Patient Populations
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01024439 -
Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Three Incisions Laparoscopic Appendicectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02714023 -
Water And Saline Head-to-head In The Blinded Evaluation Study Trial
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03324165 -
Comparing Proposed Algorithm and Current Practice in the Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01022567 -
Appendicectomy Versus Antibiotics in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06051825 -
Diagnostic Importance of the C-reactive Protein From Blood and Saliva in Children With Acute Appendicitis
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06059365 -
Clinical Trial for a Outpatient Clinical Management for Complicated Acute Appendicitis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04947748 -
Short Post-operative Antibacterial Therapy in Complicated Appendicitis: Oral Versus Intravenous
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04207645 -
Modification and Validation of the RIPASA Score for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
|
||
Completed |
NCT04615728 -
MANAGEMENT OF APPENDICITIS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02789865 -
Clinical Trial Comparing ERAT vs Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02731924 -
Point of Care Ultrasound for Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis in the Emergency Department
|
||
Completed |
NCT05104346 -
Presentation and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis During COVID Pandemic
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03886896 -
Intravenous Lidocaine in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01720082 -
Laparoscopic Appendectomy by Multi-port vs Single Port.
|
Phase 3 |