Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Laparoscopic appendicectomy is widely practiced in Hong Kong nowadays with shorter hospital stay and less wound complications. Most of the time, three small wounds of less than 10mm will be adequate enough for the completion of the surgery with minimal pain.

Recently, the concept of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (N.O.T.E.S) led to the attention of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) again in the surgical community. SILS is not a new idea. The first SILS for cholecystectomy was reported in 1997 by Navarra et al. However, the close proximity of the instruments, limitation in triangulation during dissection and suboptimal exposure of the surgical field has made this approach unpopular in last decade. Because the concept of N.O.T.E.S and the newly designed access port, surgeons are now focused again on SILS. The Chinese University of Hong Kong has recently release their preliminary results on the use of SILS on appendicectomy with satisfactory results in terms of less post-operative pain and less prominent scar. However, it was a case series with limited number of patients. In order to test the advantages of SILS on the management of patients with acute appendicitis, a double blinded randomized clinical trial is conducted.


Clinical Trial Description

Double Blinded Randomized controlled study of Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy Vs Transumbilical Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendicectomy

Introduction:

Laparoscopic appendicectomy is widely practiced in HA hospital nowadays with shorter hospital stay and less wound complications. Most of the time, three small wounds of less than 10mm will be adequate enough for the completion of the surgery with minimal pain.

Recently, the concept of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (N.O.T.E.S) led to the attention of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) again in the surgical community[1,2,3] is not a new idea. The first SILS for cholecystectomy was reported in 1997 by Navarra et al. However, the close proximity of the instruments, limitation in triangulation during dissection and suboptimal exposure of the surgical field has made this approach unpopular in last decade. Because the concept of N.O.T.E.S and the newly designed access port, surgeons are now focused again on SILS. The Chinese University of Hong Kong has recently release their preliminary results on the use of SILS on appendicectomy with satisfactory results in terms of lesser post-operative pain and less prominent scar. However, it was a cases series with limited number of patients. In order to test the advantages of SILS on the management of patients with acute appendicitis, a double blinded randomized clinical trial is conducted.

Statistical Analysis:

The primary outcome that the trial to evaluate is operative time, post-operative pain and wound infection rate. The working alternative hypothesis is that there will be significant differences in umbilical wound infection rate between Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Transumbilical Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.

At least 80 patients (40 cases in each group) is needed to demonstrate a 25% difference in umbilical wound infection rate at a statistical significance level of P> 0.05 and power of 80%. All analyses and comparisons between the two groups were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

The Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, the Chi-square test and Fisher exact test where appropriate were used to compare the result between groups. All calculations were performed by the software SPSS for Window version 15.0 (SPSS, Inc, USA). P <0.05 was considered as statistical significant.

Detailed Description:

This study seeks to examine the ability of single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy to reduce the post-operative pain and increase cosmetic outcome at the expense of longer operation time and at higher cost. Patients will be randomized preoperatively by a computer generated random allocation to either receive conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy or to have transumbilical single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Control group:

Patients will undergo conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy. A 10-mm subumbilical port will be inserted by open method. Two 5-mm working ports will be inserted under laparoscopic view at patient's left lower quadrant and suprapubic area. Umbilical fascia will be closed by PDS-1 J-shape needle.

Local anaesthetic agent , Marcain 0.5% should be infiltrated into the fascial layers as well as the skin layers with dosage up to 20ml. All skin wound will be approximated with 3-0 nylon interrupted stitches and covered with non-transparent dressings.

Compare group:

Patients will undergo transumbilical single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy. A single incision is made on umbilicus within the margin of umbilical skin ring. Peritoneal cavity is entered by open method and the fascia layer can be extended up to 2.5cm in length. A single incision laparoscopic device (Olympus) will be inserted. Conventional laparoscopic instruments will be used. Umbilical fascia will be closed by PDS-1 J-shape needle. Marcain 0.5% should be infiltrated into the fascial layers as well as the skin layers with dosage up to 20ml. The umbilicus is reconstructed by interrupted 3-0 nylon by tacking the skin onto the fascia layers.

Three non-transparent dressings will be placed as if conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy has been done.

Randomization:

Randomization is performed before consent for surgery. Patients are randomly assigned by means of sealed envelopes containing computer-generated random numbers into the following groups:

1. Control group (conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy)

2. Compare group (single port laparoscopic appendicectomy) ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01024439
Study type Interventional
Source Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date October 2009
Completion date March 2013

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01697059 - Initial Antibiotics and Delayed Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis N/A
Completed NCT04649996 - Variation in Acute Appendicitis During COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy
Completed NCT04387370 - The Use of the Hem-o-lok Clip in Appendectomy: Single or Double?
Completed NCT04030741 - Non-operative Treatment of Acute Non-perforated Appendicitis Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04860570 - Are Double-ring Wound-edge Protectors Effective for Preventing Superficial Surgical Site Infection After Open Appendectomy?
Withdrawn NCT05724628 - Non-operative vs. Operative Management of Acute Appendicitis in Vulnerable Patient Populations Phase 1
Completed NCT02714023 - Water And Saline Head-to-head In The Blinded Evaluation Study Trial N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03324165 - Comparing Proposed Algorithm and Current Practice in the Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01022567 - Appendicectomy Versus Antibiotics in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06059365 - Clinical Trial for a Outpatient Clinical Management for Complicated Acute Appendicitis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06051825 - Diagnostic Importance of the C-reactive Protein From Blood and Saliva in Children With Acute Appendicitis
Recruiting NCT04947748 - Short Post-operative Antibacterial Therapy in Complicated Appendicitis: Oral Versus Intravenous N/A
Completed NCT04615728 - MANAGEMENT OF APPENDICITIS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Terminated NCT04207645 - Modification and Validation of the RIPASA Score for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
Not yet recruiting NCT02789865 - Clinical Trial Comparing ERAT vs Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis Phase 2
Completed NCT02731924 - Point of Care Ultrasound for Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis in the Emergency Department
Completed NCT05104346 - Presentation and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis During COVID Pandemic N/A
Completed NCT03886896 - Intravenous Lidocaine in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT01720082 - Laparoscopic Appendectomy by Multi-port vs Single Port. Phase 3
Completed NCT01348464 - A Trial on Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single Port Appendectomy N/A