Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Laparoscopic (key-hole) appendicectomy is a minimally invasive procedure when compared to open large bowel resection, but is still associated with a significant amount of pain and discomfort. Analgesia is commonly provided by a multi-modal technique involving varying combinations of paracetamol, Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), regional analgesia and oral or parenteral opioids. Opioids are associated with an increased incidence of nausea, vomiting and sedation which can complicate post-operative recovery. Different techniques of intraoperative infiltration of local anaesthetic to control postoperative pain are also being used. Their perceived benefits are thought to relate to reduced opioid consumption and therefore reduced opioid side effects.

Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a technique which numbs the nerves carrying pain sensation from the abdominal wall and provides effective and safe analgesia with minimal systemic side effects. Their perceived benefits are thought to relate to reduced opioid consumption and therefore reduced opioid side effects. The investigators believe ultrasound guided TAP blocks will reduce pain and morphine consumption with a resultant improved patient satisfaction, a reduction in post-operative nausea and vomiting and earlier hospital discharge.

The key research question the investigators are trying to answer is whether TAP block provide better pain relief than local anaesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites. Both techniques are currently being used in the investigator's hospital.


Clinical Trial Description

Summary of Study Design: The study will be a double blind randomised controlled trial with patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy randomly allocated into two groups. The study group will receive bilateral TAP blocks and the control group will receive local anaesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites

A double blind design was chosen to eliminate patient and observer bias in reporting of pain scores.

The presence of the control arm will ensure that any difference observed will be due to the effect of sensory nerve block due to the TAP block than due to the systemic effect of the injected local anaesthetic.

The null hypothesis will be that there is no difference between the groups in the amount of opioids consumed by the patients during 24 hours after the operation. The investigators chose this measurement as an objective but indirect measurement of efficacy of TAP block and pain relief thus received. Measurement of pain with various scoring methods are reliable only when concurrent reduction in consumption of pain killers are demonstrated.

Recruitment and randomisation:

All patients meeting the inclusion criteria will receive a patient information leaflet about the study during the procedure and investigators will gain informed consent during the procedure consultation. Investigators aim to recruit 288 patients with 144 patients in each group.

Informed consent will be taken the evening before, or on the morning of, surgery. Patients will then be randomly allocated into either the study group or a control group. Randomisation will occur by using computer generated random numbers using the block randomisation method. Group allocation will be kept in a consecutively numbered, opaque, sealed envelope in the controlled drugs cupboard in theatre-4/emergency theatre anaesthetic room of the John Radcliffe Hospital. Once the patient has consented, the anaesthetist will open the corresponding numbered envelope and perform bilateral TAP blocks after induction of general anaesthesia if the patient is in the study group. The surgeons will infiltrate the port sites with local anaesthetic at the end of the procedure if the patient is in the control group.

Blinding:

The study group will receive bilateral TAP blocks with 20mls 0.25% bupivacaine on each side and the skin punctures on either sides will be covered with a small plaster. Patients in the control group will receive subcutaneous infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites and specimen extraction site with equivalent amount bupivacaine at the end of the procedure and small plasters will be stuck on either flanks approximately where the skin punctures for TAP block will be made.

The assessor of pain scores and morphine doses (Recovery nurse, Ward Nursing Staff & SEU Foundation Doctor) and the patient will be blinded to group allocation.

Patient: Plasters will be stuck on flanks of all the patients, both study and control group, so that patient will not know if they have received TAP block.

Recovery nurse: During handover to recovery the anaesthetist and scrub nurse will not mention group allocation.

SEU Foundation Doctor: The foundation doctor who will be following up patients on the ward will not be present in the operating theatre, ensuring that they are blinded to the technique used.

The study duration will be from induction of anaesthesia until the patients are medically fit for discharge from hospital. No extra visits other than routinely required for the surgical procedure are expected. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03252561
Study type Interventional
Source Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Contact
Status Withdrawn
Phase N/A
Start date August 2014
Completion date August 2014

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01697059 - Initial Antibiotics and Delayed Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis N/A
Completed NCT04387370 - The Use of the Hem-o-lok Clip in Appendectomy: Single or Double?
Completed NCT04649996 - Variation in Acute Appendicitis During COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy
Completed NCT04030741 - Non-operative Treatment of Acute Non-perforated Appendicitis Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04860570 - Are Double-ring Wound-edge Protectors Effective for Preventing Superficial Surgical Site Infection After Open Appendectomy?
Withdrawn NCT05724628 - Non-operative vs. Operative Management of Acute Appendicitis in Vulnerable Patient Populations Phase 1
Completed NCT01024439 - Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Three Incisions Laparoscopic Appendicectomy N/A
Completed NCT02714023 - Water And Saline Head-to-head In The Blinded Evaluation Study Trial N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03324165 - Comparing Proposed Algorithm and Current Practice in the Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01022567 - Appendicectomy Versus Antibiotics in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06059365 - Clinical Trial for a Outpatient Clinical Management for Complicated Acute Appendicitis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06051825 - Diagnostic Importance of the C-reactive Protein From Blood and Saliva in Children With Acute Appendicitis
Recruiting NCT04947748 - Short Post-operative Antibacterial Therapy in Complicated Appendicitis: Oral Versus Intravenous N/A
Terminated NCT04207645 - Modification and Validation of the RIPASA Score for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
Completed NCT04615728 - MANAGEMENT OF APPENDICITIS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Not yet recruiting NCT02789865 - Clinical Trial Comparing ERAT vs Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis Phase 2
Completed NCT02731924 - Point of Care Ultrasound for Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis in the Emergency Department
Completed NCT05104346 - Presentation and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis During COVID Pandemic N/A
Completed NCT03886896 - Intravenous Lidocaine in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT01720082 - Laparoscopic Appendectomy by Multi-port vs Single Port. Phase 3