Initial Antibiotics & Delayed Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Several recent studies have examined the feasibility and benefits of nonoperative treatment of perforated appendicitis in children. One such study showed a trend toward longer operative times for patients randomized to immediate appendectomy, but no overall advantage. In another larger study, the costs of delayed appendectomy for perforated appendicitis were higher - in part related to readmissions in the interval (6-8 weeks). Nevertheless, these and other studies have demonstrated the safety of delaying appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Emergency appendectomy is a well-established approach, and postoperative recovery in children is fast. Nevertheless, from the onset of symptoms through the hospital stay and the postoperative recovery, appendicitis causes a disruption of a family's normal routine (absence from school and work) of up to 1-2 weeks. Because this is an unplanned operation, patients have to wait until an operating room becomes available, or elective operations have to be placed on hold to accommodate the emergency operation. Each year, more than 250 children undergo an appendectomy at HCH. This represents 250 episodes of emergency surgery, or about one emergency add-on operation per working day. If an initial trial of antibiotics is safe for the treatment of appendicitis, converting an emergency operation into an elective, scheduled outpatient procedure may reduce stress and disruption of routine for patients and their families - and may allow better operating room planning for health care professionals and hospitals.

The investigators hypothesize that initial antibiotic treatment of acute (non-perforated) appendicitis, followed by scheduled outpatient appendectomy, reduces the overall cost of treating the disease and results in greater patient and family satisfaction.

This pilot study aims to establish the safety and feasibility of treating acute appendicitis with intravenous antibiotics, followed by outpatient oral antibiotics. Patients and their families will be offered the possibility of initial nonoperative treatment and subsequent outpatient elective appendectomy in a nonrandomized, single arm study.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT01697059
Study type	Interventional
Source	Rhode Island Hospital
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	September 2012
Completion date	May 2015

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04387370` - The Use of the Hem-o-lok Clip in Appendectomy: Single or Double?
Completed	`NCT04649996` - Variation in Acute Appendicitis During COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy
Completed	`NCT04030741` - Non-operative Treatment of Acute Non-perforated Appendicitis	Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT04860570` - Are Double-ring Wound-edge Protectors Effective for Preventing Superficial Surgical Site Infection After Open Appendectomy?
Withdrawn	`NCT05724628` - Non-operative vs. Operative Management of Acute Appendicitis in Vulnerable Patient Populations	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT01024439` - Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Three Incisions Laparoscopic Appendicectomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT02714023` - Water And Saline Head-to-head In The Blinded Evaluation Study Trial	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT03324165` - Comparing Proposed Algorithm and Current Practice in the Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT01022567` - Appendicectomy Versus Antibiotics in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06059365` - Clinical Trial for a Outpatient Clinical Management for Complicated Acute Appendicitis	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06051825` - Diagnostic Importance of the C-reactive Protein From Blood and Saliva in Children With Acute Appendicitis
Recruiting	`NCT04947748` - Short Post-operative Antibacterial Therapy in Complicated Appendicitis: Oral Versus Intravenous	N/A
Terminated	`NCT04207645` - Modification and Validation of the RIPASA Score for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
Completed	`NCT04615728` - MANAGEMENT OF APPENDICITIS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Not yet recruiting	`NCT02789865` - Clinical Trial Comparing ERAT vs Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT02731924` - Point of Care Ultrasound for Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis in the Emergency Department
Completed	`NCT05104346` - Presentation and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis During COVID Pandemic	N/A
Completed	`NCT03886896` - Intravenous Lidocaine in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT01720082` - Laparoscopic Appendectomy by Multi-port vs Single Port.	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT01348464` - A Trial on Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single Port Appendectomy	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Initial Antibiotics and Delayed Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms