Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01697059
Other study ID # RIH408212
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received September 24, 2012
Last updated May 4, 2015
Start date September 2012
Est. completion date May 2015

Study information

Verified date May 2015
Source Rhode Island Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Several recent studies have examined the feasibility and benefits of nonoperative treatment of perforated appendicitis in children. One such study showed a trend toward longer operative times for patients randomized to immediate appendectomy, but no overall advantage. In another larger study, the costs of delayed appendectomy for perforated appendicitis were higher - in part related to readmissions in the interval (6-8 weeks). Nevertheless, these and other studies have demonstrated the safety of delaying appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Emergency appendectomy is a well-established approach, and postoperative recovery in children is fast. Nevertheless, from the onset of symptoms through the hospital stay and the postoperative recovery, appendicitis causes a disruption of a family's normal routine (absence from school and work) of up to 1-2 weeks. Because this is an unplanned operation, patients have to wait until an operating room becomes available, or elective operations have to be placed on hold to accommodate the emergency operation. Each year, more than 250 children undergo an appendectomy at HCH. This represents 250 episodes of emergency surgery, or about one emergency add-on operation per working day. If an initial trial of antibiotics is safe for the treatment of appendicitis, converting an emergency operation into an elective, scheduled outpatient procedure may reduce stress and disruption of routine for patients and their families - and may allow better operating room planning for health care professionals and hospitals.

The investigators hypothesize that initial antibiotic treatment of acute (non-perforated) appendicitis, followed by scheduled outpatient appendectomy, reduces the overall cost of treating the disease and results in greater patient and family satisfaction.

This pilot study aims to establish the safety and feasibility of treating acute appendicitis with intravenous antibiotics, followed by outpatient oral antibiotics. Patients and their families will be offered the possibility of initial nonoperative treatment and subsequent outpatient elective appendectomy in a nonrandomized, single arm study.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 73
Est. completion date May 2015
Est. primary completion date May 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 5 Years to 18 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Maximum 48-hour-history of abdominal pain

- Diagnosis of acute appendicitis based on clinical, laboratory and/or radiologic criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Duration of symptoms > 48 hours

- Presence of an appendiceal abscess on imaging

- Clinical or laboratory suspicion of advanced appendicitis, peritonitis or perforation

- Significant comorbidities

- Inability or unwillingness to complete a 1-week course of oral antibiotics

- Allergy to penicillin

Study Design

Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Piperacillin + Amoxicillin


Locations

Country Name City State
United States Hasbro Children's Hospital (Rhode Island Hospital) Providence Rhode Island

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Rhode Island Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (5)

Narsule CK, Kahle EJ, Kim DS, Anderson AC, Luks FI. Effect of delay in presentation on rate of perforation in children with appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;29(8):890-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 Jul 13. — View Citation

Powers RJ, Andrassy RJ, Brennan LP, Weitzman JJ. Alternate approach to the management of acute perforating appendicitis in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Apr;152(4):473-5. — View Citation

St Peter SD, Aguayo P, Fraser JD, Keckler SJ, Sharp SW, Leys CM, Murphy JP, Snyder CL, Sharp RJ, Andrews WS, Holcomb GW 3rd, Ostlie DJ. Initial laparoscopic appendectomy versus initial nonoperative management and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a prospective, randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jan;45(1):236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.039. — View Citation

Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I, Ahlberg G, Haapaniemi S, Neovius G, Rex L, Badume I, Granström L. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg. 2006 Jun;30(6):1033-7. — View Citation

Yardeni D, Hirschl RB, Drongowski RA, Teitelbaum DH, Geiger JD, Coran AG. Delayed versus immediate surgery in acute appendicitis: do we need to operate during the night? J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Mar;39(3):464-9; discussion 464-9. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Utility of initial nonoperative treatment of early appendicitis Questionnaires given to parents and patients regarding their experience of initial nonoperative treatment and interval appendectomy will be analyzed, and compared with controls and with standard levels in the literature.
The Pediatric Quality of Life Scale-Version 4.0 (PedsQL) is a reliable and valid 23-item questionnaire that measures child health-related quality of life (QOL) in the preceding month. Items can be recoded from 100 to 0 on 25-point intervals and averaged to produce a total score (a=0.90). The total score is derived from items that assess the child's physical (e.g., problems with low energy or difficulty lifting something heavy), emotional (e.g., feeling afraid, angry, or scared), social (e.g., problems with getting teased or other children not wanting to be friends), and school functioning (e.g., problems paying attention in class or missing school). Higher scores indicate better QOL.
1 year No
Primary Number of treatment failures If after a period of at least 8 hours (and 2 doses of intravenous antibiotics), the patient's symptoms worsen, or fail to subside within 18 hours, the patient will undergo an emergent/urgent appendectomy, and treatment will proceed as per standard-of-care (1 intraoperative dose of antibiotics, with or without postoperative antibiotics, progressive postoperative diet and discharge home once tolerating a regular diet). The patient will then be considered having failed nonoperative treatment. Worsening of symptoms at 8 hours or failure of improvement at 18 hours of treatment Yes
Secondary Cost-saving of initial nonoperative treatment for early appendicitis Cost of nonoperative treatment will be calculated as follows: Hospitalization charges (# hospital days - observation) + costs of antibiotics (actual number of doses/days) + outpatient surgery hospital fee (operating room and PACU time) + additional costs associated with unanticipated events (e.g., Emergency room visits after initial discharge).
Control costs (contemporary data) will consider the following: Hospitalization charges (# hospital days) + intravenous antibiotics (price/dose x number of doses).
1 year No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04649996 - Variation in Acute Appendicitis During COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy
Completed NCT04387370 - The Use of the Hem-o-lok Clip in Appendectomy: Single or Double?
Completed NCT04030741 - Non-operative Treatment of Acute Non-perforated Appendicitis Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04860570 - Are Double-ring Wound-edge Protectors Effective for Preventing Superficial Surgical Site Infection After Open Appendectomy?
Withdrawn NCT05724628 - Non-operative vs. Operative Management of Acute Appendicitis in Vulnerable Patient Populations Phase 1
Completed NCT01024439 - Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Three Incisions Laparoscopic Appendicectomy N/A
Completed NCT02714023 - Water And Saline Head-to-head In The Blinded Evaluation Study Trial N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03324165 - Comparing Proposed Algorithm and Current Practice in the Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01022567 - Appendicectomy Versus Antibiotics in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06059365 - Clinical Trial for a Outpatient Clinical Management for Complicated Acute Appendicitis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06051825 - Diagnostic Importance of the C-reactive Protein From Blood and Saliva in Children With Acute Appendicitis
Recruiting NCT04947748 - Short Post-operative Antibacterial Therapy in Complicated Appendicitis: Oral Versus Intravenous N/A
Terminated NCT04207645 - Modification and Validation of the RIPASA Score for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
Completed NCT04615728 - MANAGEMENT OF APPENDICITIS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Not yet recruiting NCT02789865 - Clinical Trial Comparing ERAT vs Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis Phase 2
Completed NCT02731924 - Point of Care Ultrasound for Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis in the Emergency Department
Completed NCT05104346 - Presentation and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis During COVID Pandemic N/A
Completed NCT03886896 - Intravenous Lidocaine in Children Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT01720082 - Laparoscopic Appendectomy by Multi-port vs Single Port. Phase 3
Completed NCT01348464 - A Trial on Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single Port Appendectomy N/A