View clinical trials related to Accidental Fall.
Filter by:The goal of this study is to investigate the effects of a novel form of balance training called trip training. Trip training typically involves repeatedly exposing an individual to trip-like losses of balance on a specialized treadmill. This repeated exposure can lead to improvements in responses to trips while walking in the future, thereby reducing the risk of falling after a trip. Trip training typically is commonly conducted using a costly specialized treadmill. This study will evaluate the efficacy of a trip training protocol that does not require a treadmill. Adults age 65-80 will be assigned to either 1) non-treadmill trip training, 2) treadmill trip training, or 3) no intervention. The investigators hypothesized that responses to laboratory-induced trips would be better after non-treadmill trip training compared to no intervention, and that there would be no statistical difference between responses to laboratory-induced trips after non-treadmill trip training and treadmill trip training. The results from this work will advance the use of trip training, and may enable its wider use by establishing a protocol that does not require a costly treadmill.
Falls are a leading cause of injuries among older patients. Medication use is a major risk factor for falls. Because we lack tools to assess individualized risks, general practitioners (GPs) struggle with fall-related medication management for older patients. Furthermore, these older patients are often not properly equipped to engage in the joint management of their medication. A Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) for GPs and a patient portal for older patients may stimulate shared decision making between GPs and older patients when discussing the medication-related fall risk. The CDSS provides the GP with advice on how to alter medication in such a way that the fall risk decreases, and the patient portal helps the older patient to prepare for a consultation and to engage in the joint management of their medication.
Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) is an intervention to prevent falls among older adults developed by the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC). Studies piloting the intervention have shown promising results; however, more evidence is needed to show that the intervention can be implemented cost-effectively on a larger scale in a real-world integrated health system. To this end, NORC partnered with Emory University School of Medicine to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the STEADI intervention. This study aims to answer the following research questions to fill remaining knowledge gaps about STEADI: 1. Does STEADI significantly reduce falls among the target population compared to the standard of care? 2. Does partial implementation of some selected STEADI modules, also significantly reduce falls among the target population as compared to the standard of care? 3. Does the net present value of falls and resulting injuries averted by STEADI implementation exceed the net present value of the costs of STEADI implementation and the incremental costs that result from it? Using a mixture of qualitative interview and quantitative performance measures, the study evaluates and describes this case of STEADI implementation within selected primary care clinics of Emory Healthcare. NORC partnered with Emory University School of Medicine to implement different aspects of STEADI in a real-world primary care setting, document experiences implementing the intervention, measure implementation costs, and compare the outcomes of the STEADI intervention compared to control version of the intervention.
This parallel, randomized, controlled trial aims to quantify the effects of slip- and trip-perturbation training on fall rates collected over 12 months, compared to time-matched treadmill walking, among community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years). A sample size calculation estimated that 140 older community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years) are needed. Following baseline measures, the recruited participants will randomly be assigned to either the perturbation or the walking group. The participants in the perturbation group will be assigned to four perturbation training sessions. The walking group will perform four treadmill walking matching the exercise time of the perturbation training. Assessment of the primary outcome, fall rates, will be conducted continuously in 12 months from randomization. When a fall is reported in the fall calendar, a telephone interview will be conducted to assess the circumstances and consequences (e.g., fall-related fractures, fall-related hospital admissions) of the falls. Moreover, assessment of physical, cognitive, and social-psychological outcomes will be made at baseline, post-test, six-month, and 12-months reassessment.
Accidental falls in hospitals are serious events concerning the safety of the patients. Recent studies demonstrated that the time of falls is a key factor to be considered in prevention. It has been shown that the time of day, the day of the week and the month of the year impact on the occurrence of falls. The aim of this project is to know the effect of the application of a program of preventive measures based on the temporal patterns of the risk factors on the hospital fall occurrence. A mixed method research design will be conducted. Three phases will be carry out: 1) Longitudinal prospective study in two parts: a) audits and seminars of health professionals focused on an effective and efficient hospital falls register. Cosinor and Multi-Component analyses will be performed to obtain temporal patterns of the hospital falls and their related variables. b) Implementation of a based-temporal patterns, multidimensional prevention program. 2) Retrospective study of falls registered in institutional databases. 3) Qualitative study based on focus groups (physicians, nurses and nursing assistants). It is imperative to study temporal patterns of hospital falls to effectively and comprehensively define the etiology of falls, and therefore, design preventive strategies. A reduction of the number of in-hospital falls and related injuries is expected, as well as, an improvement of the quality of life of patients. Considering temporal patterns, and levels of mood and sleep of healthcare professionals will achieve an improvement of patient safety.
Falls in elderly people are a public health problem and in Chile there's a deficit regarding prevention strategies focused on high functioning older people who live in the community. The aim of the study is to design, implement and evaluate a comprehensive model based on house calls and oriented towards falling prevention (PM ACTIVAS' model). The researchers will perform a clinical trial in a district of Santiago, Chile to evaluate this model. Our hypothesis are that people who received the educational intervention following the PM ACTIVAS' model will: fall less frequently, improve their management on falls risk factors present at home, and have a higher falls risk perception than the control group. The researchers also expect that it will be possible to establish cut off points in a valid and reliable scale to assess the presence of falls risk factors in elderly people.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of reactive balance training (RBT) targeting slipping and tripping on laboratory-induced slips and trips. In an effort to build upon prior work, the present study included: 1) a control group receiving an alternative balance training intervention; 2) separate training and assessment sessions; 3) alternative RBT methods that may be more amenable to work outside the lab compared to prior methods, and 4) older adult participants receiving individualized training to reduce drop-out. The investigators hypothesized that slips after RBT would result in improved reactive balance kinematics, and a lower incidence of falls, compared to either initial slips before any intervention or after a control intervention. The investigators also hypothesized that trips after RBT would result in improved reactive balance kinematics, and a lower incidence of falls, compared to either initial trips before any intervention or after a control intervention. Results were intended to contribute to knowledge regarding the efficacy of alternative methods for RBT, and provide additional evidence regarding its efficacy.
This is a control study with a 2-group pretest-posttest design investigating the effects of a 10-week judo-inspired exercise program (Judo4Balance) for physical functions, self-efficacy, activity level, and fall techniques among working adults & part-time working retired people. Falls constitute a common and severe threat to older men and women's health worldwide. However, falls are not just a problem of advanced age, studies have been reporting that falls are a problem at all ages. Nevertheless, falls are under-studied, particularly among young and middle-aged adults (working age adults). For all fall-related injuries among adults, the proportions have been reported to be 32.3% among older adults, 35.3% among middle-aged adults, and 32.3% among younger adults in the United States. This indicates that falls and fall related injuries represent a significant threat to public health at all ages. Therefore, new innovative ways of prevention is much needed and needs to be studied.
This pilot work will determine the feasibility of tDCS intervention as an effective adjunct intervention to PT aimed at improving gait, balance, and mobility in older adults at risk of falling.
This 18-month prospective, observational study involving real world data will determine if the use of a standing scale that delivers a quantitative measure of standing balance along with weight (balance + weight) in place of a scale that only delivers weight (weight only) influences clinical decision making by health care practitioners in the ambulatory outpatient setting. Providers will be randomized to receive the balance+weight scale or weight-only scale for 9 months, then to crossover and receive the other for 9 months. The primary outcome measures are (1) providers' self-reported perceptions of whether the balance measurement influences their clinical decision making and (2) the rate of performing falls risk assessments or referring to a specialist for evaluation and treatment based on aggregate billing data. The secondary outcome measure is qualitative interviews with practitioners regarding their perceptions on the utility and barriers to using the device.