View clinical trials related to Abscess.
Filter by:This is a single center non-blinded randomized trial of topical anesthetic cream to usual care (warm compresses and time) for superficial, non-perianal abscesses in children under 18 years of age. The primary outcome is time to spontaneous drainage. The secondary outcomes are return to emergency room/hospital/care provider and need for incision and drainage. Information on patient experience using standardized patient reported outcome measures for health-related quality of life will also be gathered. The findings of this study will provide more robust evidence of the benefit of this treatment including a potential reduction in cost and allow for more widespread dissemination.
This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial included all patients who developed the manifestations of appendicular abscess and referred to the Zagazig University Hospital Emergency Department between January 2020 and February 2022. The study was prospectively approved by Zagazig University Faculty of Medicine Institutional Review Board (Approval Number: 55342/24.1.2020). The sample size was 172 patients divided into two equal group group (1) laparoscopic group involved 86 patients & group (2) interventional radiology group involved 86 patients.
Pelvic inflammatory diseases (PID) require antibiotic treatment. Among PID, the investigators distinguish: pelvi-peritonitis and pelvic collections such as Douglas abscess and/or tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA). Recent recommendations published in December 2018 by the National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) suggest that it is preferable to drain TOA when their size is greater than 3-4 cm. Ultrasound-guided transvaginal drainage is recommended as first-line treatment because of its ease of performance and its effectiveness. In the literature, many authors have demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of transvaginal drainage associated with antibiotics in the treatment of TOA. Since ultrasound-guided transvaginal drainage is a less invasive alternative therapeutic procedure than laparoscopy for the drainage of TOA, it would be compatible with outpatient management. This mode of management can be carried out in a dedicated outpatient or functional exploration room with the help of a nurse but without an anesthetic team present. This gesture is simple and short-lived. In addition, the antibiotics used have pharmacological properties allowing oral intake from their initiation. The investigators have proposed a new service protocol to treat TOA in this outpatient mode. The investigators therefore wish to analyze this new protocol from these three angles: 1/ the feasibility of this care, 2/ the quality of life of the patients through questionnaires given throughout the care and 3/ an evaluation of the 'efficiency.
Rationale: Perianal fistula is a burdening disease with an annual prevalence of 2/100.000 in the Dutch population. More than 90% of crypto-glandular fistulas originate from anorectal abscess. Despite adequate drainage of anorectal abscess up to 83% recurs or results in an anal fistula, the majority developing within 12 months. Up till now it is not common practice to routinely administer prophylactic antibiotics to prevent anal fistula development.\ Objective: The objective of this trial is to establish if adding antibiotic treatment to surgical drainage of perianal abscess results in less perianal fistulas. Study design: The study concerns a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial with treatment of perianal abscess by surgical drainage alone or combined with antibiotic treatment. Patients will be accrued by all participating clinics. The design involves allocation of all appropriate consecutive patients with a primary occurrence of perianal abscess to surgical drainage followed by either antibiotics or placebo. Data will be analyzed on 'intention to treat' basis in case patients are not subjected to the randomized treatment modality. Study population: Men and women of 18 years and older who present for the first time with a perianal abscess. Intervention (if applicable): The antibiotic group receives 7 days of oral metronidazole (500 mg every eight hours) and ciprofloxacin (500 mg every twelve hours) in addition to surgical drainage. The other group receives surgical drainage and postoperatively identical placebo tablets. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome measure is development of a perianal fistula. Secondary outcome measures are quality of life at 12 months measured with the EQ-5D-5L with Dutch rating. Further: in-hospital direct and indirect costs and out-of hospital postoperative costs, need of repeated drainage, patient related outcome (PRO) and clinical outcome measures. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: For this study, patients are asked to take part in a study comparing the addition of antibiotic treatment to surgical drainage of perianal abscess. Patients will not be burdened by extra hospital visits. At baseline participants will complete PRO questionnaires. Also at 1 week and 3, 6 and 12 months participants will fulfill the PRO questionnaires. These will be send to them by email and will take approximately 10 minutes each time.
The purpose of this prospective study is to compare MRI and DECT in imaging acute neck infection. 50 patients suspected for neck infection will undergo both modalities, which will then be compared in terms of depiction of edema, conspicuity of inflammation, and characterization and number of abscesses. We hypothesize that DECT will have diagnostic performance comparable to that of MRI, and superior to that of traditional single-energy CT. This study will yield important new information about the performance of DECT, a novel and rapid method for emergency imaging.
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Reverse Conversion (Open to Laparoscopic) in management of Acute Perforated Appendicitis
The Virus in Endodontics (VE) phase I pilot study for preoperative pain will be analyzed and adjusted for the Phase II clinical trial. The Phase II clinical trial on preoperative pain, postoperative pain, and clinical healing will involve 250 patients. Patients will be recruited from the same pool of participants as the Phase II clinical trial. Preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans will be taken as well as three and six month postoperative CBCT scans. The secondary outcomes form the Phase II randomized clinical trial will be clinical success and visible radiographic healing determined by CBCT images.
Study the efficacy of a package of behavioral economics strategies (versus an education-only control condition) in altering clinician behavior regarding antibiotic prescription duration for skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI).
Pyogenic liver abscess is one of the most common visceral abscesses, its incidence is increasing worldwide. According to the previous literature, the mortality rate of pyogenic liver abscess is as high as 31% and become a serious social health problem. However, the data of prospective observational real-world studies are scarce and no relevant research of the liver histological change has been reported, so the long-term prognosis and the risk factors for pyogenic liver abscess are still unknown. Patients will be followed up prospectively for a period of 2 years and observed clinical prognosis (all-cause mortality, the recurrence rate, and the rehospitalization rate). The investigators will investigate the predictive value of clinical risk factors for clinical prognosis and establish clinical prediction models to predict the long-term prognosis of pyogenic liver abscesses.
Thoracic complications directly or indirectly consequence of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (including either pathologies strictly related to the infection, or iatrogenic effects of therapeutic attempts to treat it) have been described during the pandemic. Many of the above conditions often require a surgical approach but, based on published data reporting high early postoperative morbidity and mortality, many experts initially advised against any referral to surgery in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, the issue is if salvage surgical approach should be always excluded or could be considered when it represents the only remaining effective option. In the absence of solid data and recommendations, this is a demanding challenge for thoracic surgeons. The investigators have coordinated a multicenter study to collect the experience of several worldwide high-volume thoracic surgery departments. Their objective is to investigate efficacy and safety of surgery in COVID-19 patients who developed thoracic complications that required operative management.