Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT04534816 |
| Other study ID # |
11068 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
N/A
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
March 12, 2020 |
| Est. completion date |
September 30, 2020 |
Study information
| Verified date |
November 2020 |
| Source |
Rigshospitalet, Denmark |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The surgical management of penetrating bowel and intestinal injuries, inflicted via a gunshot
or knife stabbing, has long been a topic of debate [1-3]. The surgical management principally
consists of: (i) primary repair; (ii) primary diversion or (iii) an initial abbreviated so
called "damage control" operation followed by a definitive surgical intervention once the
patient is stabilized [4-9] . Different classifications systems have been proposed to help
determine the best operative option [2,3,10-14], but intestinal injuries can be difficult to
manage and despite improvements in the diagnostics and treatment of penetrating abdominal
trauma, high mortality and morbidity rates are prevalent [15,16]. In order to determine the
correct surgical option an accurate determination of intestinal viability is essential. But
clinically assessing regional perfusion is challenging and surgeons' clinical risk assessment
of anastomotic leaks have shown a low predictive value [17]. Hence, there is a need for more
precise diagnostic tool helping the surgeon in assessing intestinal viability the extent of
intestinal injury.
Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is an applied method for to
assessing visceral perfusion worldwide. The obtained fluorescent signal after intravenous
injection, is considered proportional to blood flow, thus aiding the surgeon to detect and
address inadequate regional perfusion, despite satisfactory macroscopic appearance,
intraoperatively [18-21]. Hence, the use of perioperative ICG-FA, has reduced the risk of
anastomotic leaks after esophageal and colorectal surgery [22-25] and in the setting of acute
mesenteric ischemia, significantly reduced the extent of intestinal resection [26]. In
retrospective review of 186 war related trauma cases the use of ICG-FA was deemed useful
however only 9 of these cases were truncal/abdomen/gastrointestinal and no objective
definition of usability was provided [27]. Hence, data on the usability and feasibility of
ICG-FA for in penetrating abdominal trauma is limited and to our knowledge has not been
investigate in a civilian population previously.
The present study aimed to investigate the usability and feasibility of ICG-FA in patients
undergoing open abdominal exploration for penetrating abdominal trauma
Description:
The surgical management of penetrating bowel and intestinal injuries has been the topic of
debate since before the second world war [1-3]. The injury is most often inflicted via a
gunshot or knife stabbing. Different classifications systems have been proposed to help
determine the best operative option: (i) Flint Grading System (FGS); (ii) Penetrating
Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI); (iii) Colonic/Rectal Injury Scale (CIS/RIS); and (iv)
destructive/non-destructive colonic injuries; (v) Stone and Fabian's criteria [2,3,10-14].
Principally, a penetrating injury of the intestine can be managed by: (i) primary repair
(suturing the hole in the intestine); (ii) primary diversion (the intestine, above the
injury, is brought through the abdominal wall as a "stoma") or (iii) an abbreviated primary
operation (laparotomy, where large bleeding is stopped and destroyed tissue is removed) and
planned reoperation, within 24-48 hours, for definitive treatment (final treatment, for
example reconnecting intestinal ends). The concept of abbreviated primary operation, also
known as "damage control surgery", is today well established in trauma care [4-6]. A damage
control operation with regards to intestinal injury, entails a primary resection/removal of
the affected intestinal segment in which the remaining intestinal ends are closed off and not
surgically connected (anastomosed) in the first operation.[4-9]. The abdomen is left "open"
(the incision through the abdominal wall is not sutured closed but covered with a temporary
dressing), and a relaparotomy (re-operation) is conducted once the patient is stabilized (at
the end of which the abdominal wall is closed), usually after 24-48 h [4-9]. During the
re-laparotomy, the intestines will then either be anastomosed (re-connected), or a stoma will
be created if the intestine is deemed too damaged to be re-connected [4-9].
Non-destructive colonic injuries (Flint grades 1 & 2 and CIS grades I to III) are generally
treated with primary repair, which involves the identification, debridement and single-layer
suture repair of perforation and then dressing the repaired site with omentum (an
intra-abdominal layer of fat and vessels) [1,2,10,12]. Primary repair is generally considered
the better option in this setting [1-3,28].
Destructive colon wounds (Flint grade 3 or CIS grades IV and V) encompass those injuries that
require segmental resection (parts of the large intestine have to be removed) due to
extensive damage or loss of blood supply or both [10,12]. The management of destructive colon
wounds is less clear and is still debatable. However, primary repair has been deemed as a
safe option, while primary diversion has been opted for in particular cases [1-3,9,11,29-33].
In unstable patients; those with hypovolemic shock (large blood loss), blood-poisoning due to
intestinal content leaking into the abdominal cavity, systemic hypothermia (low body
temperature), and complex intra-abdominal injuries; an abbreviated laparotomy is considered
to be an appropriate course of action [7,11,30,32-34].
In colonic trauma, the anastomosis leak rate (the connection between to intestinal ends
breaks down) is reported between 4-27% [34-37]. A leak in the sight of intestinal connection
is a severe complication which greatly increases the length of hospitalization, increases
patient morbidity and has a significant negative impact on patient's recovery. The mortality
rate for an anastomotic leak around 10-15% [38,39]. Factors associated with anastomotic
failure include co-morbid immune-compromising disorders such as diabetes mellitus, acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome, cirrhosis and a transfusion requirement of more than six units of
blood [36]. Other potential risk factors appear to be shock, significant associated injuries,
and delay of operation [35,36].
In firearm injuries the tissue damage is proportionate to a variety of factors: Projectile
velocity, -entrance profile, -calibre, -design, distance travelled within the body
(penetrating projectiles deliver their total kinetic energy to the body, whereas perforating
projectiles transfer significantly less), biologic characteristics of the impacted tissue and
the mechanisms of tissue disruption (e.g. stretching, tearing, crushing) [40]. The extent of
damage in the tissue surrounding the entered organ can be difficult to assess, and despite
improvements in diagnostics and treatment of abdominal gunshot wounds, high mortality and
morbidity rates are still found [15,16].
In conclusion, intestinal injuries can be difficult to manage. A primary repair is preferable
but there is a need for more precise diagnostic tools helping the surgeon to access the
extent of intestinal injury. Also, reducing the extent of intestinal removal has a high value
for the patient as extensive resections can lead to nutritional difficulties even after
discharge.
Fluorescence guided surgery Assessing intestinal blood supply is a challenging task even for
experienced surgeons. One of the biggest concerns is the blood supply of the anastomosis (the
surgical connection between to intestinal ends) since poor blood supply is regarded as a
significant risk factor for anastomotic leak [41-44]. As mentioned above, an anastomotic leak
is a severe complication in gastrointestinal surgery and has a significant negative impact on
patients recovery with the mortality rate for an anastomotic leak around 10-15% [38,39].
Fluorescence guided surgery (FGS) enables visualization of structures that are otherwise
hidden from the naked human eye. A fluorescent contrast agent is used, most often indocyanine
green (ICG), and by illuminating the tissue with near-infrared light, the excited ICG can be
detected by a camera with an optical filter. ICG is a tricarbocyanine dye with very few
adverse events, a short half-life, and exclusively metabolized in the liver and excreted
unchanged in the bile [45,46]. The safety of ICG well established and the contrast is used
routinely in surgical settings worldwide, just as it has gained popularity in oncological
surgery in recent years [45-47].
ICG binds to plasma proteins in the blood after intravascular injection, and by illuminating
the tissue with near-infrared red light, the fluorescence intensity during the first passage
in tissue is considered proportional to blood flow (perfusion). This real-time visualization
of visceral perfusion (blood flowing to a given organ) may reduce the rate of anastomotic
leakage because inadequate vascularization can be detected during the operation [18-20].
Also, the option for intraoperative visual assessment of blood flow to the intestine, stomach
and surrounding tissues, allowing for modification to the surgical plan, may eliminate
anastomotic break down or leak due to inadequate vascularization despite satisfactory blood
supply on naked-eye appearance [20,21,48], (Figure 1).
Figure 1. A. Intestinal segment as viewed with the naked eye. B. Evaluation of blood flow
after injection of ICG, viewed with the infra-red camera (ICG-FA). C. A computer generated
combination of images A and B ("overlay") allowing the surgeon to evaluate intestinal blood
supply.
In a prospective observational study on patients with a left-sided colorectal cancer, ICG
fluorescence angiogram (FA) altered operative decisions in 34.5% of the cases (n=111) i.e.
the site of resection was adapted after tissue perfusion evaluated with ICG FA. Also, the use
of ICG FA significantly reduced the anastomotic leak rate in patients undergoing surgery for
colorectal cancer [49]. In patients undergoing esophagectomy, the use of ICG FA with
intervention was found to have a risk reduction for complications of 69% and a significantly
lowered risk of anatomic leaks [25].
The use of ICG FA has been shown to improve patient outcome and reduce patients risks in
elective settings, however, there is much need for evaluation in the acute/emergency setting.
The risk of complications, patient morbidity and mortality are inherently higher in an
emergency surgical setting compared to an elective/planned setting [50]. Thus, it is feasible
to believe that the use of ICG FA in an emergency setting will improve patient outcome and
reduce risk of complications. There is to date little literature on the use of ICG FA in an
emergency/trauma setting. However, a recent retrospective study by Karampinis et al. 2018
deemed the use of ICG FA as a feasible and technically reliable technique in patients
undergoing emergency surgery for acute mesenteric ischemia. Indocyanine Green FA provided
additional information regarding intestinal perfusion in 18 of their 53 cases (35%). In 11
patients the surgical strategy was amended by ICG angiography, showing adequate perfusion,
and thus no indication for intestinal resection. No further resections were performed on
these patients during the second- and third- look laparotomies [26]. In March 2015, Green et
al. presented a retrospective review of all war-related traumatic and reconstructive cases
employing the intraoperative use of indocyanine green angiography within the US army over a
three year period [27]. They concluded that - Intraoperative fluorescent angiography is an
objective, useful tool to assess various war-related traumatic injuries [27].
The Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, have developed an ICG
quantification algorithm which has been validated and described earlier [51]. This algorithm
has now been incorporated into a touch screen tablet, allowing for live perioperative
quantitative perfusion assessments with ICG (Q-ICG). A color-coded map of perfusion intensity
is provided as an overlay on the white light visualized tissue (Figure 2). In a feasibility
study of ten patients undergoing surgery for stomach cancer, significant alterations of
optimal perfusion points selected by surgeons were found when comparing points selected in
white light, ICG FA and Q-ICG (Nerup, in review).
Figure 2. The remaining stomach (gastric conduit) viewed by white light, Near-Infrared Light
(ICG FA) and with Q-ICG overlay.
As ICG FA can assess micro-perfusion, we believe that it has the possibility to improve
intraoperative evaluation of tissue integrity and as such improve the surgical plan and
outcome in patients suffering gunshots to the abdominal viscera. We also believe that the
quantification tool provided by Rigshospitalet will further assist the surgical
decision-making.
Aim This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of perfusion assessment with traditional
visual, visual ICG FA and Q-ICG.
referenses
1. Cheong JY, Keshava A. Management of colorectal trauma: a review. ANZ J Surg.
2017;87(7-8):547-53.
2. Maxwell RA, Fabian TC. Current management of colon trauma. World J Surg.
2003;27(6):632-9.
3. Greer LT, Gillern SM, Vertrees AE. Evolving colon injury management: a review. Am Surg.
2013;79(2):119-27.
4. Burch JM, Ortiz VB, Richardson RJ, Martin RR, Mattox KL, Jordan GL. Abbreviated
laparotomy and planned reoperation for critically injured patients. Ann Surg.
1992;215(5):476-83-4.
5. Hirshberg A, Mattox KL. Planned reoperation for severe trauma. Ann Surg.
1995;222(1):3-8.
6. Hirshberg A, Mattox KL. "Damage control" in trauma surgery. Br J Surg.
1993;80(12):1501-2.
7. Ordoñez CA, Pino LF, Badiel M, Sánchez AI, Loaiza J, Ballestas L, Puyana JC. Safety of
performing a delayed anastomosis during damage control laparotomy in patients with
destructive colon injuries. J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1512-7-8.
8. Miller PR, Chang MC, Hoth JJ, Holmes JH, Meredith JW. Colonic resection in the setting
of damage control laparotomy: is delayed anastomosis safe? Am Surg. 2007;73(6):606-9-10.
9. Tatebe LC, Jennings A, Tatebe K, Handy A, Prajapati P, Smith M, Do T, Ogola GO, Gandhi
RR, Duane TM, Luk S, Petrey LB. Traumatic colon injury in damage control laparotomy-A
multicenter trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(4):742-9.
10. Moore EE, Dunn EL, Moore JB, Thompson JS. Penetrating abdominal trauma index. J Trauma.
1981;21(6):439-45.
11. Sharpe JP, Magnotti LJ, Weinberg JA, Shahan CP, Cullinan DR, Marino KA, Fabian TC, Croce
MA. Applicability of an Established Management Algorithm for Destructive Colon Injuries
after Abbreviated Laparotomy: A 17-Year Experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(4):636-41.
12. Flint LM, Vitale GC, Richardson JD, Polk HC. The injured colon: relationships of
management to complications. Ann Surg. 1981;193(5):619-23.
13. Stone HH, Fabian TC. Management of perforating colon trauma: randomization between
primary closure and exteriorization. Ann Surg. 1979;190(4):430-6.
14. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, Jurkovich GJ, Champion HR, Gennarelli TA, McAninch
JW, Pachter HL, Shackford SR, Trafton PG. Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum,
small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma. 1990;30(11):1427-9.
15. Fackler ML. Civilian gunshot wounds and ballistics: dispelling the myths. Emerg Med Clin
North Am. 1998;16(1):17-28.
16. Swan KG, Swan RC. Principles of ballistics applicable to the treatment of gunshot
wounds. Surg Clin North Am. 1991;71(2):221-39.
17. Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ, Wiggers T, Baas PC, van Dam GM. Surgeons lack
predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J
Colorectal Dis. 2009;24(5):569-76.
18. Mangano A, Fernandes E, Gheza F, Bustos R, Chen LL, Masrur M, Giulianotti PC.
Near-Infrared Indocyanine Green-Enhanced Fluorescence and Evaluation of the Bowel
Microperfusion During Robotic Colorectal Surgery: a Retrospective Original Paper. Surg
Technol Int. 2019;34.
19. Zehetner J, DeMeester SR, Alicuben ET, Oh DS, Lipham JC, Hagen JA, DeMeester TR.
Intraoperative Assessment of Perfusion of the Gastric Graft and Correlation With
Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2015;262(1):74-8.
20. Mangano A, Gheza F, Chen LL, Minerva EM, Giulianotti PC. Indocyanine Green
(Icg)-Enhanced Fluorescence for Intraoperative Assessment of Bowel Microperfusion During
Laparoscopic and Robotic Colorectal Surgery: The Quest for Evidence-Based Results. Surg
Technol Int. 2018;32:101-4.
21. Gossedge G, Vallance A, Jayne D. Diverse applications for near infra-red intraoperative
imaging. Color Dis. 2015;17:7-11.
22. Watanabe J, Ishibe A, Suwa Y, Suwa H, Ota M, Kunisaki C, Endo I. Indocyanine green
fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low
anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Surg
Endosc. 2019;
23. Sujatha-Bhaskar S, Jafari MD, Stamos MJ. The Role of Fluorescent Angiography in
Anastomotic Leaks. Surg Technol Int. 2017;30:83-8.
24. Alekseev M, Rybakov E, Shelygin Y, Chernyshov S, Zarodnyuk I. A Study investigating the
Perfusion of Colorectal Anastomoses Using FLuorescence AnGiography: results of FLAG
randomized trial. Color Dis. 2020;
25. Ladak F, Dang JT, Switzer N, Mocanu V, Tian C, Birch D, Turner SR, Karmali S.
Indocyanine green for the prevention of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a
meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(2):384-94.
26. Karampinis I, Keese M, Jakob J, Stasiunaitis V, Gerken A, Attenberger U, Post S, Kienle
P, Nowak K. Indocyanine Green Tissue Angiography Can Reduce Extended Bowel Resections in
Acute Mesenteric Ischemia.
27. Green JM, Sabino J, Fleming M, Valerio I. Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography: A
Review of Applications and Outcomes in War-Related Trauma. Mil Med. 2015;180(3S):37-43.
28. Choi WJ. Management of colorectal trauma. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(4):166-72.
29. Nelson RL, Singer M. Primary repair for penetrating colon injuries. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev. 2003;(3).
30. Bhimji SS, Burns B. Penetrating Abdominal Trauma [Internet]. StatPearls. StatPearls
Publishing; 2018.
31. Mansor S, Bendardaf R, Bougrara M, Hagam M. Colon diversion versus primary colonic
repair in gunshot abdomen with penetrating colon injury in Libyan revolution conflict
2011 (a single center experience). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29(9):1137-42.
32. Smith IM, Beech ZKM, Lundy JB, Bowley DM. A prospective observational study of abdominal
injury management in contemporary military operations: damage control laparotomy is
associated with high survivability and low rates of fecal diversion. Ann Surg.
2015;261(4):765-73.
33. Shazi B, Bruce J, Laing G, Sartorius B, Clarke D. The management of colonic trauma in
the damage control era. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99(1):76-81.
34. Ott MM, Norris PR, Diaz JJ, Collier BR, Jenkins JM, Gunter OL, Morris JA. Colon
Anastomosis After Damage Control Laparotomy: Recommendations From 174 Trauma
Colectomies. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2011;70(3):595-602.
35. Murray JA, Demetriades D, Colson M, Song Z, Velmahos GC, Cornwell EE, Asensio JA,
Belzberg H, Berne T V. Colonic resection in trauma: colostomy versus anastomosis. J
Trauma. 1999;46(2):250-4.
36. Demetriades D, Murray JA, Chan L, Ordoñez C, Bowley D, Nagy KK, et al. Penetrating colon
injuries requiring resection: diversion or primary anastomosis? An AAST prospective
multicenter study. J Trauma. 2001;50(5):765-75.
37. Gingold DS, Murrell ZA, Fleshner PR. A Prospective Evaluation of the Ligation of the
Intersphincteric Tract Procedure for Complex Anal Fistula in Patients With Crohn's
Disease. Ann Surg. 2014;260(6):1057-61.
38. Vallance A, Wexner S, Berho M, Cahill R, Coleman M, Haboubi N, Heald RJ, Kennedy RH,
Moran B, Mortensen N, Motson RW, Novell R, O'Connell PR, Ris F, Rockall T, Senapati A,
Windsor A, Jayne DG. A collaborative review of the current concepts and challenges of
anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19(1):O1-12.
39. Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, Burns B, Cataldo PA. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal
anastomosis: it's later than you think. Ann Surg. 2007;245(2):254-8.
40. Bartlett CS, Helfet DL, Hausman MR, Strauss E. Ballistics and gunshot wounds: effects on
musculoskeletal tissues. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 8(1):21-36.
41. Pommergaard H-C, Achiam MP, Burcharth J, Rosenberg J. Impaired blood supply in the
colonic anastomosis in mice compromises healing. Int Surg. 2015;100(1):70-6.
42. Kruschewski M, Rieger H, Pohlen U, Hotz HG, Buhr HJ. Risk factors for clinical
anastomotic leakage and postoperative mortality in elective surgery for rectal cancer.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(8):919-27.
43. Kim MJ, Shin R, Oh H-K, Park JW, Jeong S-Y, Park J-G. The impact of heavy smoking on
anastomotic leakage and stricture after low anterior resection in rectal cancer
patients. World J Surg. 2011;35(12):2806-10.
44. Fawcett A, Shembekar M, Church JS, Vashisht R, Springall RG, Nott DM. Smoking,
hypertension, and colonic anastomotic healing; a combined clinical and histopathological
study. Gut. 1996;38(5):714-8.
45. Staller BJ, Staller BJ, Hepner G, Banka VS, Finney RA. Adverse Reactions After
Administration of Indocyanine Green. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1978;240(7):635.
46. Alander JT, Kaartinen I, Laakso A, Pätilä T, Spillmann T, Tuchin V V., Venermo M,
Välisuo P. A Review of Indocyanine Green Fluorescent Imaging in Surgery. Int J Biomed
Imaging. 2012;2012:1-26.
47. Baiocchi GL, Diana M, Boni L. Indocyanine green-based fluorescence imaging in visceral
and hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: State of the art and future directions. World
J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(27):2921-30.
48. Boni L, Fingerhut A, Marzorati A, Rausei S, Dionigi G, Cassinotti E. Indocyanine green
fluorescence angiography during laparoscopic low anterior resection: results of a
case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(4):1836-40.
49. Blanco-Colino R, Espin-Basany E. Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to
reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22(1):15-23.
50. Mullen MG, Michaels AD, Mehaffey HJ, Guidry CA, Turrentine LE, Hedrick TL, Friel CM.
Risk associated with complications and mortality after urgent surgery vs elective and
emergency surgery : Implications for defining "quality" and reporting outcomes for
urgent surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):768-74.
51. Nerup N, Andersen HS, Ambrus R, Strandby RB, Svendsen MBS, Madsen MH, Svendsen LB,
Achiam MP. Quantification of fluorescence angiography in a porcine model. Langenbeck's
Arch Surg. 2017;402(4):655-62.
52. Owens SL. Indocyanine green angiography. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(3):263-6.
53. Spinoglio G, Bertani E, Borin S, Piccioli A, Petz W. Green indocyanine fluorescence in
robotic abdominal surgery. Updates Surg. 2018;70(3):375-9.
