View clinical trials related to Venous Thromboembolism.
Filter by:Patients with COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or hospitalized with severe form have a poor prognosis (almost 30% rate of death). They present often a high cardiovascular risk profile (almost 30% of hypertension and 19% of diabetes). Troponin has been described to be elevated in a high proportion of patients (one fifth of all patients and 50% of non-survivors) suggesting the possibility of cardiomyopathies. High levels of DDimers (81% of non survivors) and fibrin degradation products are also associated with increased risk of mortality suggesting also the possibility of venous thromboembolism. Therefore, screening for cardiomyopathies and venous thromboembolism could represent an important challenge for patients with COVID-19 management.
The standard or usual treatment for patients diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism is treatment with blood thinners (called anticoagulants). While treatment of blood clots with blood thinners is effective, some research has shown that adding a statin (medication used to lower cholesterol) may give extra protection. It is thought that statins can improve how cells along the walls of the vein control inflammation, which can prevent new blood clots from forming. The medication in this study, rosuvastatin, is approved in Canada for use as a cholesterol-lowering medication. The use of rosuvastatin in this study is considered investigational. This means that Health Canada has not approved the use of rosuvastatin as a treatment for blood clots. However, it has been approved for use in this research study. The purpose of this study is to examine if adding a statin (rosuvastatin) to the usual blood thinner treatment will decrease the risk of another blood clot forming. The investigators also hope to discover if taking a statin reduces damage to your veins. To do this, some of the participants in this study will get rosuvastatin and others will receive a placebo (a substance that looks like the study rosuvastatin but does not have any active or medicinal ingredients). The placebo in this study is not intended to have any effect on your blood clot. A placebo is used to make the results of the study more reliable.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the earliest sign of cancer. Identifying occult cancers at the time of VTE diagnosis may lead to significant improvement of patients' care. This is also an upmost issue for patients who want to know if an underlying cancer might have triggered the VTE. An individual patient-level data meta-analysis (IPDMA) supports extensive screening strategies for occult cancer especially based on FDG PET/CT, and suggests that the best target population for cancer screening would be patients with unprovoked VTE older than 50 years of age (6.7% in patients aged 50 years or more vs. 1.0% in patients of less than 50 years (OR: 7.1, 95% CI: 3.1 to 16%).
The main venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk prediction model for ambulatory cancer patients is Khorana. Cancer thrombosis is associated with elevated thrombin generation. Its quantification is a promising method for evaluating patient's thrombotic profile. This study aims to develop a predictive model of VTE risk in ambulatory cancer patients, combining thrombosis biomarkers (D-dimers and thrombin generation potential) with the Khorana score. This is a prospective observational study that includes newly diagnosed cancer patients proposed for anti-tumor treatment (chemotherapy, immunotherapy or targeted therapies). Patients with disease progression are allowed if chemotherapy-free for 3 months. A 6-month mean incidence of VTE 6-10% is expected, requiring a sample size of 600 patients. Blood sample is collected at inclusion to analyze thrombosis biomarkers and blood count. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of symptomatic or incidental VTE within 6 months of inclusion. Models will follow a logistic approach with K-fold cross-validation (k=10). Model quality will be assessed with Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Decision for entering predictors in multivariate models will be based on p <.10 in the univariate analysis.
This research study is attempting to answer the question of whether 81 mg aspirin once daily is as effective as 81 mg aspirin twice daily in preventing blood clots after total joint replacement surgery.
In France, venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease is usually managed by vascular medicine physicians (VMP). The national OPTIMEV study, conducted more than 12 years ago among VMP practicing in hospital and in the community described the management of VTE in routine clinical practice. Since then a large number of practice changing studies have been published. This includes trials that have validated the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), the new standard of care of VTE, as per new national and international guidelines. Management of VTE in 2019 appears to be significantly different from the one that prevailed more than 10 years ago when the last national survey was conducted. It is therefore important to have an update on the routine clinical practice management of VTE by VMP. In this perspective the investigators aim to conduct a national survey among VMP practicing in France
FADOI (Italian Scientific Society of Hospital Internal Medicine) has planned to promote a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled clinical study in order to evaluate the effects of a systematic assessment of patients by using the Padua prediction score and the IMPROVE Bleeding score vs clinical judgement on the use of antithrombotic prophylaxis and clinical outcomes (thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events).
The clinical significance of pulmonary embolism (PE) limited to the subsegmental pulmonary arteries, so called isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE), remains controversial. Whether isolated SSPE represents "true" PE, a clinically more benign form of PE, a physiologic lung clearing process, or a false positive result (artifact) is currently unclear and hence, whether patients with isolated SSPE benefit from anticoagulant treatment is uncertain. Despite growing evidence from observational studies that withholding anticoagulation may be a safe option in selected patients with isolated SSPE (i.e., those without concomitant deep vein thrombosis, cancer, etc.), most patients with isolated SSPE receive anticoagulant treatment, which is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. The overall objective of the randomized controlled SAFE-SSPE trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clinical surveillance without anticoagulation compared to anticoagulation treatment in low-risk patients with isolated SSPE.
The study aims at optimizing extended management of elderly patients (> 75 years) with at least one of the known bleeding risk factor, who suffered from first episode of venous thromboembolism of the lower extremity (proximal deep vein thrombosis with or without pulmonary embolism) (VTE). Patients were randomized to receive three different treatment: Sulodexide 250 mg BIS in die; Sulodexide 500 BID in die or indistinguishable placebo to verify the efficacy and safety of extended treatment for 12 months with Sulodexide (Vessel®) in the secondary prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis / Pulmonary Embolism (DVT/PE) recurrence.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or both, is a life-threatening complication in postoperative patients. VTE has been estimated an incidence ranged from 79 per 100000 to 269 per 100000 population1. The incidence of VTE rises up to 3.0% in average among all postoperative neurosurgical patients in recent studies, but the number varies in a large range according to primary diseases. This cross-sectional study was aimed to investigate the incidence, associated risk factors, prophylaxis, treatment, and outcomes of VTE in a large clinical neurosurgery center in China.