View clinical trials related to Urodynamics.
Filter by:To investigates the effects of botulinum toxin type A bladder injection compared to combined pharmacotherapy with Mirabegron and Solifenacin.
The goal of this prospective observational trial is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the Glean Urodynamics System (GUS) for use in the clinic to collect vesical pressure data in adult males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: • What is the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of GUS for use in clinical to collect vesical pressure data in adult males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms? Participants will undergo a planned conventional urodynamics exam after which the Glean Sensor will be inserted and ambulatory urodynamics will be performed with the sensor indwelling in the bladder after which the sensor will be removed.
Lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) is a very common complication of urological, gynecological, neurological, metabolic, inflammatory or tumor disease. LUTD is not an inevitable condition, the investigators can help in many ways. Modern clinical examinations like urodynamics allow for patient tailored treatment strategies. Urodynamics however, even if minimal invasive, may lead to urinary tract infections and are very expensive4. Aim of this study is to evaluate in the long-term perspective what patients profit of urodynamic examinations and in what patients the investigators could resign to perform urodynamics in the future and or in what patients the interval of urodynamics could be extended. Main objective is to follow in a long-term prospective cohort study, patients suffering of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). In this observational study the investigators will include all patient undergoing clinical routine urodynamic examination to better address what is the normal course of LUTD with and without Treatment. The aim is to have a prospective urodynamics database allowing to answer questions related to urodynamics.
The goal of this prospective observational trial is to assess the safety and reliability of the Glean Urodynamics System (GUS) in adult females with lower urinary tract symptoms. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: • What is GUS's ability to safely and reliably conduct wireless, catheter-free monitoring of vesical pressure compared to the vesical pressures collected with conventional urodynamics? Participants will undergo a conventional urodynamics exam, a simultaneous urodynamics exam with GUS, ambulatory urodynamics with GUS, and extended home monitoring with GUS. Researchers will compare GUS data with that from a conventional urodynamics exam.
Urodynamic studies are objective diagnostic methods recommended and used in the evaluation and diagnosis of urinary incontinence, which is a very common problem that can significantly affect women's health and quality of life, cause social and economic losses. With these examinations, objective observation of bladder functions, repetition and classification of patients' symptoms, and identification of the underlying pathological cause, if possible, are provided in the evaluation of lower urinary system dysfunctions; In this way, the diagnosis is made, the choice of treatment is affected, the results of the treatment can be predicted and appropriate counseling can be given to the patients. Although conventional urodynamics is currently accepted as the gold standard test in the investigation of lower urinary tract symptoms, non-physiological retrograde bladder filling may adversely affect the test results and patients have to be under observation on the examination table while being examined with the conventional urodynamic method. Conventional method may not be effective enough in revealing the etiopathogenesis of lower urinary system symptoms, because they cannot perform activities where lower urinary system symptoms occur. Although many studies have shown that the diagnostic value of ambulatory urodynamics (AU) is higher in urogynecology clinical practice, it was not found suitable for routine investigation due to its longer duration, time-consuming and cost-effectiveness. For this reason, its routine use has been limited in international guidelines for AU in cases where conventional urodynamics is insufficient in the diagnosis, by indicating its application. In the AU method, all physiopathological changes in the lower urinary system can be observed synchronously, since the bladder filling is orthograde, not retrograde, that is, the lower urinary system is examined while the physiological urine is filled, not liquid, and the patients can perform the activities they want, and the symptoms that occur during these activities can be recorded by the patient. Despite the advantages of performing it under these conditions, it takes a long time to be evaluated with 2-4 voiding cycles and is used as a second step in cases that cannot be diagnosed by conventional urodynamics. In the previous studies performed by us, it was seen that the results of the ambulatory urodynamic examination performed with a single voiding cycle were similar to the studies in the literature using multiple voiding cycles. However, at the moment, there is no study in the literature that determines the optimal duration of this test. For these reasons, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the test at the end of a single voiding cycle with that at the end of multiple (2 to 4) voiding cycles.
Aim: This study was carried out to compare the effects of different education methods utilized before a urodynamic testing procedure on patients' pain, anxiety, readiness for the procedure, and satisfaction. Background: Urodynamic testing is an invasive procedure that causes pain and anxiety. Patient education is an evidence-based nursing intervention that relieves pain and anxiety and increases patient satisfaction. Design: The study is a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Method: Participants (n=80) were randomly assigned to four groups. While patients in the control group were provided with routine clinical information, patients in the intervention group were given education with brochures, videos, and brochure-supported videos. The research data were collected by using a Data Collection Form with items about participants' descriptive characteristics, the State Anxiety Inventory, and the Visual Analog Scale.
This pre-market study will be conducted on consenting patients undergoing a medically prescribed, invasive, conventional urodynamics (UDS) test using the investigational device (e۰Sense® urodynamic catheters). Data pertaining to the safety, effectiveness and usability of the catheters will be collected.
Retrospective study, which analyzed 100 medical histories of patients who were admitted o the Neurological Rehabilitation Ward of the Rehabilitation Clinic in the Orthopedic-Rehabilitation Hospital in Poznan in years 2010-2019.
This is prospective cohort study. All the patients with primary cervical cancer in the future three years in Peking Union Medical College Hospital will be included in this study. Before and after the major therapy (including at least radical hysterectomy and/or radiotherapy), the patients accept (1) the questionnaires survey about quality of life; (2) urodynamic testing; (3) rectum dynamics testing and (4) ovarian reserve function. The survival outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) will be supplemented as secondary objectives.
In the population of obese women, the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) is around 70%. It was shown in the literature that weight loss by bariatric surgery allowed a significant improvement in the symptoms and impact on the quality of life of the IU. However, no prognostic factor for recovery has yet been identified and the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning this improvement are not fully elucidated. The main objective of this study is to highlight the urodynamic changes associated with the improvement of the symptom and quality of life scores in a population of incontinent obese women before and after bariatric surgery.