Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05811104
Other study ID # 10021798
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 20, 2023
Est. completion date June 30, 2025

Study information

Verified date March 2023
Source University of Calgary
Contact Rajamannar Ramasubbu, MD
Phone 403-471-4794
Email rramasub@ucalgary.ca
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and Theta burst stimulation (TBS) are approved by the US. Food and Drug administration (FDA) for the treatment of refractory major depression. TBS is more efficient than rTMS as it requires shorter stimulation time.Studies suggest that the efficacy of TBS could be enhanced and expedited by accelerated protocols (more than once daily sessions) with higher doses of stimulation (>600 TBS pulses up to 3600 pulses per session) and shorter duration of treatment (4-10days). The main objective of this study is to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of accelerated high dose bilateral TBS treatment for patients with treatment resistant depression in comparison to sham stimulation using a randomized double blind clinical trial design.


Description:

Major depressive disorder (MDD) accounts for the highest global burden of all mental health disorders, and approximately 50% of depressed patients meet criteria for treatment resistant of depression. Stimulation based therapies have recently become a promising alternative for patients with treatment resistant depression. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is approved by the US. Food and Drug administration (FDA) and has been recommended as a viable treatment option for major depression. Recently, a newer form of rTMS called Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is approved by FDA as it has shown comparable clinical efficacy and safety to rTMS in the treatment of depression. TBS is more efficient than rTMS as it requires shorter stimulation time of ≤ 6min compared to 20-40 min required in conventional rTMS protocol and produces equivalent antidepressant responses. Studies suggest that the efficacy of TBS could be enhanced and expedited by accelerated protocols (more than once daily sessions ranging from 2-10 sessions/day) higher doses of stimulation (>600 TBS pulses up to 3600 pulses per session) with shorter duration of treatment (4-10days). Recently, an accelerated Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy protocol (10 sessions of iTBS a day for 5 days) with high dose stimulation (90,000 pulses in total) was found to be more effective than sham for severe TRD. This protocol yielded robust results with 69.2% response rates compared to 13% in sham during the 4-week outcome period . The main goal of this project is to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of accelerated high dose bilateral TBS treatment for TRD in comparison to sham stimulation using a randomized double blind clinical trial design. The second objective is to examine the durability of antidepressant effect of this treatment protocol. Our initial open label study of accelerated high dose bilateral TBS demonstrated efficacy in a small cohort of participants with TRD. This proposed study builds on our initial findings whether the antidepressant efficacy of accelerated high dose bilateral TBS would be significantly greater than an identical schedule of sham stimulation. This pilot study will help to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of treatment protocol, and estimate the sample size for the next pivotal trial. Hypotheses: Accounting this is a pilot study using small sample size without power size calculations, it is not designed for hypothesis testing. However, it is predicted that the accelerated bilateral TBS would be clinically effective and safe in the treatment of patients with TRD compared to sham stimulation. Additionally, it is anticipated that the antidepressant effects of this treatment may be durable.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date June 30, 2025
Est. primary completion date May 20, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Diagnosis of MDD (DSM-V) - Adults in the age range of 18 - 65 - Both sex - HAMD-17 score of =20 - TRD - failure to two antidepressant trial Stage II (Thase and Rush classification) Exclusion Criteria: - Post traumatic stress disorder, - Obsessive compulsive disorder, - Psychosis - Bipolar disorder, - substance abuse disorder, - autistic spectrum disorder, - active suicidal behavior - Epilepsy - Dementia, - Movement disorders - severe head injury - Brain metallic implants, cardiac pacemakers - Pregnancy . - Non-response to prior rTMS, Electroconvulsive treatment, Vagal nerve or Deep brain stimulation or a history of psychosurgery. - Borderline personality disorder, - Schizotypal, schizoid & paranoid personality disorder - Current treatment with anticonvulsants or benzodiazepines

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Sequential bilateral theta burst stimulation
Three sessions of active or sham bilateral TBS will be delivered daily for 10 days in 2 weeks (no session on weekend) with a total of 30 sessions for each patient. Daily low intensity (90% resting motor threshold) bilateral sequential continousTBS ( cTBI) will be applied first on the right DLPFC (1800 pulses) and then intermittent TBS (iTBS)on the left DLPFC (1800 pulses) with an intersession interval of 60 minutes. We will adopt 1800 pulse per session based on the previous studies. Patients will receive a stimulation of 3600 pulses a session, 10,800 pulses a day and 108,000 pulses in total. After the study, sham group will receive active stimulation following the same protocol

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Calgary

References & Publications (6)

Blumberger DM, Vila-Rodriguez F, Thorpe KE, Feffer K, Noda Y, Giacobbe P, Knyahnytska Y, Kennedy SH, Lam RW, Daskalakis ZJ, Downar J. Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depressi — View Citation

Cole EJ, Phillips AL, Bentzley BS, Stimpson KH, Nejad R, Barmak F, Veerapal C, Khan N, Cherian K, Felber E, Brown R, Choi E, King S, Pankow H, Bishop JH, Azeez A, Coetzee J, Rapier R, Odenwald N, Carreon D, Hawkins J, Chang M, Keller J, Raj K, DeBattista — View Citation

Levkovitz Y, Isserles M, Padberg F, Lisanby SH, Bystritsky A, Xia G, Tendler A, Daskalakis ZJ, Winston JL, Dannon P, Hafez HM, Reti IM, Morales OG, Schlaepfer TE, Hollander E, Berman JA, Husain MM, Sofer U, Stein A, Adler S, Deutsch L, Deutsch F, Roth Y, — View Citation

Lisanby SH, Husain MM, Rosenquist PB, Maixner D, Gutierrez R, Krystal A, Gilmer W, Marangell LB, Aaronson S, Daskalakis ZJ, Canterbury R, Richelson E, Sackeim HA, George MS. Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: clinical predictors of outcome in a multisite, randomized controlled clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Jan;34(2):522-34. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.118. Epub 2008 Aug 13. — View Citation

Thomas L, Kessler D, Campbell J, Morrison J, Peters TJ, Williams C, Lewis G, Wiles N. Prevalence of treatment-resistant depression in primary care: cross-sectional data. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Dec;63(617):e852-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675430. — View Citation

Voigt JD, Leuchter AF, Carpenter LL. Theta burst stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Psychiatry. 2021 May 28;11(1):330. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01441-4. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Mean change in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores (0-60) from baseline to week 4 post treatment. Higher scores mean worse outcome. Baseline to week 4 post treatment
Secondary Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17(HDRS-17) Mean change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17(HDRS-17) scores (0-52) from baseline to week 4 post treatment. Higher scores mean worse outcome Baseline to week 4 post treatment
Secondary Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology- Self Report (QIDS-SR) Mean change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology- Self Report (QIDS-SR) scores (0-27) from baseline to week 4 post treatment. Higher scores mean worse outcome. Baseline to week 4 post treatment
Secondary Columbia scale of suicidal behavior (CSS) Mean change in Columbia scale of suicidal behavior (CSS) scores (2-25) from baseline to week 4 post treatment. Higher scores mean worse outcome. Baseline to week 4 post treatment
Secondary World Health Organization Quality of Life ( WHOQOL) BREF Mean change in Quality of Life- ( WHOQOL) BREF - scores ( 0-100) from baseline to week 4 post treatment. Higher scores mean better outcome. Baseline to week 4 post treatment
Secondary Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) Mean change from Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) ( 1-7) baseline to week 4 post treatment. Higher scores mean worse outcome Baseline to week 4 post treatment
Secondary Categorical outcomes Response (a reduction = 50% in MADRS from the baseline to 4 weekend point) and remission (MADRS score = 10) rates for each group At 4 week post treatment
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04124341 - PCS in Severe Treatment Resistant Depression N/A
Recruiting NCT03887715 - A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Blinded Trial Demonstrating the Safety and Effectiveness of VNS Therapy® System as Adjunctive Therapy Versus a No Stimulation Control in Subjects With Treatment-Resistant Depression N/A
Completed NCT04727229 - Stellate Ganglion Block for Major Depressive Disorder. Phase 4
Completed NCT04634669 - Open-Label Safety Study of AXS-05 in Subjects With TRD (EVOLVE) Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT03175887 - Investigational TMS Treatment for Depression N/A
Completed NCT03134066 - Neurocognitive Features of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression
Active, not recruiting NCT01984710 - Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression With the Medtronic Activa PC+S N/A
Completed NCT01935115 - Comparing Ketamine and Propofol Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy Phase 4
Terminated NCT01687478 - A Study of Olanzapine and Fluoxetine for Treatment-resistant Depression Phase 3
Completed NCT00531726 - Berlin Deep Brain Stimulation Depression Study N/A
Recruiting NCT04041479 - Biomarker-guided rTMS for Treatment Resistant Depression Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05870540 - BPL-003 Efficacy and Safety in Treatment Resistant Depression Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04959253 - Psilocybin in Depression Resistant to Standard Treatments Phase 2
Completed NCT04856124 - Intranasal Esketamine to Maintain the Antidepressant Response to IV Racemic Ketamine
Recruiting NCT03272698 - ECT With Ketamine Anesthesia vs High Intensity Ketamine With ECT Rescue for Treatment-Resistant Depression Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT04451135 - CET- REM (Correlating ECT Response to EEG Markers) N/A
Recruiting NCT05680220 - 40 Hz Light Neurostimulation for Patients With Depression (FELIX) N/A
Completed NCT03288675 - Stepped Care aiTBS 2 Depression Study (Ghent) N/A
Recruiting NCT06138691 - KET-RO Plus RO DBT for Treatment Resistant Depression Phase 1
Terminated NCT02675556 - Allogeneic Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hMSCs) Infusion in Patients With Treatment Resistant Depression Phase 1