View clinical trials related to Thrombosis.
Filter by:This observational study will use a new way to test for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the leg. A DVT is a blood clot in the leg and is a medical problem that can cause swelling, pain, and redness. If the blood clot is not treated, it can cause more serious, long-term effects, and occasionally lead to death. The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1. How safe is our new blood clot testing method? 2. How efficient is our new blood clot testing method? The study will be run in the emergency department and urgent care centre in Kingston, Ontario. Patients who are tested for a DVT in the leg can be included in the study. Researchers follow the patient through chart review to make sure the new system is safe and efficient.
Aprospective, multicentre, single-arm clinical trial in which approximately 36 subjects would be enrolled using the Bridge 4.5 mm and 5.0 mm stent in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria in this protocol. The success rate of immediate post-procedure stent target lesion treatment was recorded for all subjects, and the incidence of in-stent restenosis (≥50% stenosis) was assessed by DSA imaging follow-up at 6 months (±30 days) post-procedure. The subjects were also followed up at 30 days (±7 days), 6 months (±30 days), and 12 months (±60 days) after stent implantation to assess safety events during the follow-up period. .
Background: The optimal antithrombotic strategy early after aortic valve replacement surgery with a biological valve remains controversial due to lack of high-quality evidence. Either oral anticoagulants or acetylsalicylic acid should be considered for the first three months. Hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening on cardiac compute tomography has been associated with latent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis and may be prevented with anticoagulation. The investigators hypothesize that anticoagulation with apixaban is superior to single antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid in reduction of hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening of bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement. Methods: In this prospective, open-label, randomized trial patients without an indication for oral anticoagulation undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement surgery with novel rapid-deployment bioprosthetic valves will be randomized. The treatment group will receive 5 mg of apixaban twice a day for the first three months and 100 mg of acetylsalicylic acid thereafter. The control group will have 100 mg of acetylsalicylic acid once a day indefinitely. After the three-month treatment period a contrast enhanced electrocardiogram-gated cardiac computed tomography will be performed to identify hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening of the bioprosthetic valve. The primary objective of the study is to assess possible superiority of the treatment group in the prevention of hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening three months after randomization. Secondary objective is to assess possible noninferiority for safety of apixaban-based strategy when compared to acetylsalicylic acid at three months. Discussion: Antithrombotic therapy after aortic valve replacement surgery is used to prevent valve thrombosis and systemic thromboembolism. Latent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a precursor of clinically significant prosthetic valve dysfunction or thromboembolic event. The hallmark feature of latent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening on cardiac computed tomography. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis occurs frequently in bioprosthetic aortic valves, more commonly in transcatheter than in surgical valves. There is no evidence on the effect of direct oral anticoagulants on the incidence of hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening after surgical aortic valve replacement with rapid deployment bioprostheses.
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people who have deep vein thrombosis (DVT). DVT is a condition that occurs when a blood clot forms in a deep vein in the leg. DVT is called 'proximal' when the clot is formed in the veins of the hip, thigh, and knee. DVT can cause serious health problems. The blood clots in the veins can break loose and can then travel through the bloodstream and get stuck in the lungs, blocking blood flow to the lungs. Symptoms of DVT include swelling, pain, and tenderness in the affected leg, as well as redness and warmth in the area. Currently, DVT is usually treated using blood thinners to prevent the clot from getting bigger or breaking off and traveling to the lungs. However, blood thinners may not be able to remove a blood clot quickly and may not be suitable for everyone who has DVT. BAY3018250 is a drug that works by dissolving blood clots. In this study, researchers will compare BAY3018250 with placebo to learn how well it works and how safe it is in participants with proximal DVT. A placebo looks like the study drug but does not have any medicine in it. Using a placebo helps researchers to confirm that the results observed during the study were caused by the study drug and not by other factors. The main purposes of this study are to learn: - How well BAY3018250 works in dissolving blood clots in participants with proximal DVT and - How safe is BAY3018250 as a treatment for participants with proximal DVT? For this, the researchers will use ultrasound tests to measure blood clots in participants before and at various times after study treatment. They call these measurements a clot burden score. They will compare the clot burden score before and after treatment and will calculate a complex measure called AUC. This tells researchers how the clots have changed over time. And researchers will collect the number of bleeding events that require medical attention. The study participants will be randomly (by chance) assigned to one of 3 treatment groups. Dependent on the group, they will receive a single dose of high dose or low dose of BAY3018250 or placebo. Researchers will closely monitor participants for 90 days after receiving the study treatment. During the study, the doctors and their study team will: - take blood samples - do physical examinations - examine heart health using electrocardiogram (ECG) - check vital signs such as blood pressure, heart rate - undergo ultrasound tests to measure the blood clots - ask the participants questions about how they are feeling and what adverse events they are having. An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events, irrespective if they think it is related or not to the study treatments.
The study aims to compare the modified approach through ipsilateral deep calf venous access of contralateral femoral venous access with the traditional approach through ipsilateral popliteal venous access for mixed type deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and determine whether it can achieve similar therapeutic effects as central type DVT.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate safety and tolerability data when SRSD107 is administered as single and multiple SC injections to healthy participants. This information, along with PK/PD data, will help establish the appropriate doses and dosing regimen for future studies in patients.
About 1/3 patients with mild stroke have poor prognosis, whether patients with this type undergo thrombolysis has been a controversial issue. A pooled analysis published in the Lancet in 2014 included 9 high-quality RCT studies of intravenous thrombolysis such as NINDS and IST3, and a total of 666 (10%) patients with mild stroke were included in the analysis. For mild stroke, the proportion of good prognosis in the control group and the alteplase group was 58.9% and 68.7% (OR 1.48, 95%Cl 1.07-2.06), respectively. Therefore, guidelines recommended alteplase thrombolytic therapy for patients with mild stroke. However, PRISMS, a randomized controlled trial of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for mild stroke published in 2018, found that alteplase intravenous thrombolytic therapy did not improve clinical outcomes compared with aspirin in patients with mild non-disabled stroke (90-day mRS 0-1 ratio 78.2% vs 81.5%), and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was higher. However, a major limitation of the PRISMS study was that more than 85% of patients had numbness and dysarticulation, so this conclusion cannot be extrapolated to patients with other mild stroke symptoms. Moreover, due to the early termination of the sponsorship of this trial, the number of enrolled cases did not reach the pre-designed number, resulting in a serious decline in the authenticity of the study results. Symptoms and outcomes of minor stroke are important criteria for assessment. However, there is currently no uniform standard for the assessment of disability. Therefore, the center developed a mild stroke EMSS assessment scale to refine the disability assessment of stroke symptoms. It was found that intravenous thrombolytic therapy was safe and effective for patients with symptoms such as dizziness, disorientation, memory impairment, decreased muscle strength at the proximal end of one limb, and ataxia while standing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether ischemic stroke patients with onset or detection time within 4.5 hours, and mild stroke patients with NIHSS score ≤5 with any of the following symptoms: dizziness, disorientation, memory impairment, single proximal muscle strength decline, or ataxia while standing could benefit from intravenous thrombolysis based on CT/MRI screening in the Chinese population.
To study thrombin generation parameters in critically ill patients with and without central line related thrombosis (CRT).
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate tailored duration of long-term anticoagulant treatment after a first venous thromboembolism based on individualized risk assessments of recurrent VTE and major bleeding risks. Participants will be asked to fill in a questionnaire and take a buccal swab, which are used for an individual estimation of the risks of recurrent VTE and bleeding. Based on these risks a treatment advise will be made, or randomised in a subgroup of patients.
The purpose of the COMPLEX Registry is to prospectively and retrospectively collect baseline, clinical and procedural data of patients who have undergone PCI or CABG for complex and/ or calcified chronic CAD, irrespective of clinical presentation as well as to prospectively collect data about their clinical outcomes. The outcomes will be compared in different clinical subgroups (e.g. PCI vs. CABG). The impact of current PCI techniques/ devices, but also CABG strategies in different clinical settings and coronary artery lesions on cardiovascular outcomes will be assessed.