Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06464835 |
Other study ID # |
2024-6-11 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 1, 2024 |
Est. completion date |
December 1, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2024 |
Source |
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
In recent years, research on intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS), as a special
high-frequency (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation,rTMS) stimulation paradigm, has
focused on exploring the effects in healthy people. Based on previous studies, it is believed
that the central magnetic stimulation combined with peripheral electrical stimulation based
on the "central-peripheral-central" closed-loop rehabilitation concept has the best effect,
but there are few clinical studies on the efficacy and mechanism of iTBS combined treatment
of dysphagia after stroke, and the selection of the optimal stimulation scheme and target has
not yet been determined, therefore, this study aims to observe the efficacy and mechanism of
implementation of iTBS combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on with
patients with dysphagia (PSD) .
Description:
The purpose of this study is to observe the effect of intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
(iTBS) combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on patients with dysphagia
(PSD) after stroke, and to detect the activation of related swallowing networks in patients
with PSD after receiving iTBS combined with NMES by functional near-infrared spectroscopy
(fNIRS), and to explore the possible mechanism of PSD treatment, so as to provide a
theoretical basis for finding the best, specific and individualized treatment plan for the
treatment of PSD patients. Promote the functional recovery of patients, reduce complications,
and promote the prognosis of diseases.
Patients who withdrew treatment for any reason other than progression (other than withdrawal
of consent or loss to follow-up) continued to undergo objective assessment every 8 weeks to
collect information on disease progression. Investigators were required to collect long-term
follow-up information on survival by telephone at least every 12 weeks after documentation of
disease progression by contacting patients, family members, or the patient's current treating
physician.
Subjects who have the right to withdraw from the trial in the middle of the trial, or who are
no longer tested and are lost to follow-up even though they have not explicitly proposed to
withdraw from the trial, are also considered "withdrawal" (or "dropout"). The reasons for
their withdrawal should be known as much as possible and documented. If the withdrawal is due
to an adverse event, the patient should be visited for examination until the pre-treatment
status or no clinical significance, and the adverse event form should be completed. The cause
of the absconted case should be recorded in detail, and the informed consent form, original
medical record, and case report form should be retained for future reference.
Treatment of drop-off cases: (1) When the subject falls off, the investigator should contact
the subject to inquire about the reason as much as possible by visiting the door to make an
appointment by telephone or letter. (2) If the experimental case is withdrawn due to allergic
reactions, adverse reactions, or ineffective treatment, the investigator shall take
corresponding treatment measures according to the actual situation of the subject. (3) The
investigator should fill in the record of the main reason for discontinuing the trial. (4)
All patients who have been selected and have been numbered, regardless of whether they have
dropped out or not, should be recorded and kept for observation, both for filing and for
intention-to-intention analysis (ITT), and all shedding cases should be summarized and
statistically analyzed.
The sample size was calculated using G-power software based on the references.SPSS software
was used for statistical description and analysis. Count data were expressed as rates or
percentages, and chi-square tests were used for comparisons between groups. If the data
conform to the normal distribution and the variance is homogeneous, (x̅ ± s) is used to
express the continuous data, the one-way ANOVA was used for comparison between multiple
groups, the least-significant difference (LSD) method was used for subsequent pairwise
comparisons, and the paired sample t-test was used for comparison before and after treatment
within the group. If the normal distribution is not conformed, the median and quartile
M(P25,P75) are used, and the rank sum test is used. A P value of less than 0.05 indicated
that the difference was statistically significant. The task state data processing of
(functional near-infrared spectroscopy,fNIRS) is run by NirSpark toolkit software for data
preprocessing. is run by NirSpark toolkit software for data preprocessing.