Stroke Clinical Trial - Optimizing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will compare the effectiveness of different polarities of transcranial direct current stimulation paired with intensive motor training in recovery of upper extremity function in individuals with severe post-stroke hemiparesis. The hypothesis is that more severely impaired individuals will derive greater benefit from anodal stimulation of the ipsilesional hemisphere or cathodal stimulation of the contralesional hemisphere than dual stimulation (anodal applied to the ipsilesional hemisphere and cathodal applied to the contralesional hemisphere.)

Clinical Trial Description

This study has 2 aims: 1) determine which transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) electrode configuration is most effective in combination with motor training to promote motor recovery from severe post-stroke hemiparesis; and 2) begin to clarify the extent to which baseline transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures predict response to tDCS, as well as the effects of tDCS paired with motor training on TMS measures of motor cortical organization.

To accomplish these aims, the investigators will recruit 36 human subjects with severe post-stroke hemiparesis and assign each subject to 1 of 4 tDCS conditions (anodal excitatory ipsilesional; cathodal inhibitory contralesional; a combination of anodal excitatory ipsilesional during cathodal inhibitory contralesional; or sham). Each subject will undergo a 20-minute stimulation session once a day for 10 days over a 2-week period. Each session will be followed by 3 hours of intensive, task-oriented upper extremity motor training.

Outcome measures for this study include TMS motor cortical maps and standardized tests of motor performance. The investigators hypothesize that all groups will show improvement in all measures; however, both the anodal excitatory ipsilesional group and the cathodal inhibitory contralesional group will show significantly greater improvement compared with the other 2 groups. The investigators will also find evidence clarifying whether the presence or absence of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) has predictive value regarding which tDCS configuration would be most effective for a particular subject. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03124147
Study type	Interventional
Source	University of Kentucky
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	August 2011
Completion date	October 2013

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT04043052` - Mobile Technologies and Post-stroke Depression	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03869138` - Alternative Therapies for Improving Physical Function in Individuals With Stroke	N/A
Completed	`NCT04034069` - Effects of Priming Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial	N/A
Completed	`NCT04101695` - Hemodynamic Response of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Cerebellar Hemisphere in Healthy Subjects	N/A
Terminated	`NCT03052712` - Validation and Standardization of a Battery Evaluation of the Socio-emotional Functions in Various Neurological Pathologies	N/A
Completed	`NCT00391378` - Cerebral Lesions and Outcome After Cardiac Surgery (CLOCS)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06204744` - Home-based Arm and Hand Exercise Program for Stroke: A Multisite Trial	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06043167` - Clinimetric Application of FOUR Scale as in Treatment and Rehabilitation of Patients With Acute Cerebral Injury
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04535479` - Dry Needling for Spasticity in Stroke	N/A
Completed	`NCT03985761` - Utilizing Gaming Mechanics to Optimize Telerehabilitation Adherence in Persons With Stroke	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT00859885` - International PFO Consortium	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06034119` - Effects of Voluntary Adjustments During Walking in Participants Post-stroke	N/A
Completed	`NCT03622411` - Tablet-based Aphasia Therapy in the Chronic Phase	N/A
Completed	`NCT01662960` - Visual Feedback Therapy for Treating Individuals With Hemiparesis Following Stroke	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05854485` - Robot-Aided Assessment and Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity Function After Stroke	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05520528` - Impact of Group Participation on Adults With Aphasia	N/A
Completed	`NCT03366129` - Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in People With White Matter Hyperintensities Who Have Had a Stroke
Completed	`NCT03281590` - Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases Registry
Completed	`NCT05805748` - Serious Game Therapy in Neglect Patients	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05993221` - Deconstructing Post Stroke Hemiparesis

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Optimizing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Motor Recovery From Hemiparesis

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms