View clinical trials related to Stomach Neoplasms.
Filter by:The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary end points included duration of locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), quality of life and safety. For metastatic lung cancer, LRC is the local control of metastatic lung tumor here.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase-II study. Approximately 120 subjects with CR/PR/SD after platinum compounds and fluoropyrimidines based regimens: up to 6 cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine, up to 12 cycles of FOLFOX, up to 8 cycles of XELOX, will be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to one of the following treatment groups: Arm A: Placebo 4 tablets once daily on day 1-21, every 4 weeks, until intolerance or progression disease Arm B: Regorafenib 160 mg, 4 tablets once daily on days 1-21, every 4 weeks, until intolerance or progression disease Primary Variable: PFS1
The jejunum of the input segment is properly ligated with double line 7 at 3-5cm from the anastomotic site, and the jejunum of the output segment is extended to 30cm
The purpose of this study is to find out how effective the combination of crizotinib and fulvestrant is in shrinking lobular breast cancer tumours. The investigators will also be assessing the side effects of the combination of crizotinib tablets and fulvestrant injections. The side effects and the doses of crizotinib and fulvestrant have already been evaluated in large clinical trials, but this is the first time these two drugs will be combined together.
This is a first-in-human (FIH), open-label, phase 1 dose-escalation study of KN026 in subjects with HER2 positive advanced breast and Gastric Cancer. The standard "3 + 3" design was used for dose escalation. There are 5 proposed dose levels which are 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 mg/kg, but dosing interval may be adjusted during the study (such as QW, OR Q2W, OR Q3W) based on emerging data from this trial and/or from phase 1 trial of KN026 in other country. Dose escalation will continue until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is reached or if MTD is not found, dose escalation will continue until the MAD of 20 mg / kg is reached. Dose expansion will carried out in 20 mg/kg Q2W and 30 mg/kg Q3W.
Treatment for stage 4 gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis has been unchanged for decades. The median survival for stage 4 gastric cancer is 9-14 months with systemic chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy is under many clinical trials mainly in Japan, and are showing promising results. This is Korea's first clinical trial on Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel with Systemic mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy.
The study will compare the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy versus trastuzumab in combination with SOC chemotherapy in participants with HER2-positive gastric cancer. The primary hypotheses of the study are that pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy is superior to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in terms of 1) progression free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR), and 2) overall survival (OS).
This project seeks to analyze and define the mechanism (s) involved in the resistance to checkpoint therapy in metastatic GC patients. The investigators propose the use of a Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) assay that involves 395 genes allowing us to define a specific molecular signature to characterize responder and non-responder patients to checkpoint therapy in combination with IHC analyses of specific factors. Such signature (s) could then be used to predict which individuals who might get the most benefit out of checkpoint therapy treatment. Analysis will be perfomed retrospectively using biopsies provided by mGC patients recruited at the Red de Salud UC treated with checkpoint therapy, the response of patients to treatment is evaluated by RECIST 1.1 criteria and thereby they are classified as "responders" or "non-responders".
The patients with upper gastric cancer (cT1N0M0) or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (diameter less than 4 cm) will be enrolled into this study. Each of these patients will undergo radical proximal gastrectomy and be randomly allocated into one of the two groups, double tract anastomosis group or esophagogastrostomy group. The following data will be collected to compare the difference between the two reconstruction methods: the rate of reflux esophagitis, postoperative quality of life, economic expenditure, the safety of operation, postoperative recovery, postoperative nutrition status and oncological effect. Through the comprehensive analysis, the result of this study will elucidate the best of the reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy.
The efficacy and safety of the use of pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib.