View clinical trials related to Solid Carcinoma.
Filter by:The purpose of this study to find out whether mirdametinib is a safe treatment for people with advanced solid tumor cancer that has certain mutations. Researchers will look at whether mirdametinib on its own or in combination with the drug fulvestrant is a safe treatment that causes few or mild side effects in people with advanced solid tumor cancer.
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns of the risk of infection may lead to fear, anxiety or psychological disorders that may become generalised and long-lasting, corresponding to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD generally occurs in circumstances such as terrorist attacks, hostage-taking, bombings, aggression, accidents... The current health crisis also represents an increased risk of PTSD. After the first moments of stress, the illness becomes more diffuse: personality change (introverted/extraverted), sleep disorders, heart problems, hypervigilance reaction, agoraphobia, symptoms of reminiscence, irritability, decreased concentration, memory loss... In some people, PTSD can lead to more disabling problems such as (crowd) avoidance. In order to help patients with PTSD, clinical psychology offers therapeutic approaches which, starting from a debriefing with the patient, provide supportive therapy which (i) reassures by providing information on the symptomatology, in order to play down the present state of mind, (ii) allows for the expression of what was experienced during the event, (iii) initiates a process of elaboration of the trauma through transference. A study initiated at the François Baclesse Centre during the first confinement, which included 735 patients from April to June 2020, made it possible to assess the impact of the pandemic linked to COVID-19 on the care of cancer patients treated in day hospitals, but also to evaluate the PTSD experienced by patients, sleep difficulties, quality of life, cognitive complaints and confinement conditions using validated questionnaires. This study showed that 21% of patients had proven PTSD and 23% had insomnia problem. This study proposes to evaluate the value of adapted psychological care for patients with PTSD in relation to the pandemic on the improvement of PTSD, as well as on resilience, quality of life and sleep.
Older patients with cancer constitute a heterogeneous group with varying comorbidity; therefore, geriatric assessment with initial screening is recommended. The Geriatric 8 (G8) has been established as a promising screening tool. Currently, there are no guidelines for oncogeriatric screening in older cancer patients in Denmark. We hypothesize that by screening persons age 70 years or more with newly diagnosed cancer, with the G8, we can assess the prognostic value and identify a subgroup of patients who will benefit from a CGA. Aims: - Determine whether Danish cancer patients, with a G8 score of ≤14, experience poorer quality of life (QoL), receive less recommended standard cancer treatment, experience more treatment-related toxicity, stop treatment earlier, and experience shorter survival than patients with a G8 score >14. - Ascertain whether the standard G8 cut-off score of ≤14 is the most relevant cut-off score, with respect to treatment adherence, treatment-related toxicity, QoL, and survival, when focusing on the older Danish cancer patient population. - Establish whether the performance and prognostic value of the G8 can be strengthened through the addition of a functional measure, the 30-second chair stand test (30-CST), and/ or the handgrip strength test (HGST). - Evaluate the prognostic value of the modified Geriatric 8 (mG8) Methods: A prospective, descriptive study of all outpatients with newly diagnosed solid tumors at the Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, age 70 years or more. Patients will be screened with the G8, mG8, 30-CST, HGST, and QoL questionnaires at baseline with subsequent one-year follow-up, to determine the prognostic value of the G8 and the mG8. An initial two-month pilot study will help determine inclusion rates and highlight necessary practical adjustments to ensure optimal study participation. Baseline characteristics will be compared with descriptive statistics. Our primary endpoint; Global Health status/ QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 & QLQ-ELD14), and secondary endpoints; treatment adherence, and treatment-related toxicity, will be assessed using logistical regression; while secondary endpoints; overall survival, cancer-specific survival, will be assessed using the Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. Post hoc diagnostic performance analysis will be conducted to determine the optimal G8 cut-off and whether functional measures (30-CST and HGST) can enhance screening accuracy.
This study will be conducted in adult subjects diagnosed with any form of an advanced or metastatic solid tumors including urothelial carcinoma for which standard therapy is no longer effective or is intolerable. This is a phase 1, multi-center, open label study designed to assess safety and tolerability of IK-175 as a single agent and in combination with nivolumab, to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Disease response, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and response biomarkers will also be assessed.
The purpose of this study is to elucidate efficacy and safety of influenza vaccine in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor.
A Phase 1 study will be conducted to establish safety and dose level of AMXT 1501 dicaprate alone, and in combination with DFMO, in cancer patients.