View clinical trials related to Respiratory Insufficiency.
Filter by:Intraoperative intravenous fluid management practice varies greatly between anesthesiologists. Postoperative fluid based weight gain is associated with major morbidity. Postoperative respiratory complications are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and hospital costs. The literature shows conflicting data regarding intraoperative fluid resuscitation volume. No large-scale studies have focused on intraoperative fluid management and postoperative respiratory dysfunction. Hypotheses: Primary - Liberal intraoperative fluid resuscitation is associated with an increased risk of 30 day mortality Secondary - Liberal intraoperative fluid resuscitation is associated with increased likelihood of postoperative respiratory failure, pulmonary edema, reintubation, atelectasis, acute kidney injury and peri-extubation oxygen desaturation.
Background There is no unanimous opinion about a lung-protective strategy in cardiac surgery. Small randomized clinical and animals trials suggest that ventilation during cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) could be protective on the lungs. This evidence is based on surrogate end-points and most of studies are limited to elective coronary surgery. According to the available data, an optimal strategy of lung protection during CPB cannot be recommended. The purpose of the CPBVENT study is to investigate the effectiveness of different ventilation strategies during CPB on post-operative pulmonary complications. Trial design The CPBVENT study will be a single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. We are going to enroll 780 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with planned use of CPB, aortic cross-clamping and two lung ventilation. Patients will be randomized into three treatment groups: 1) no ventilation during CPB; 2) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O during CPB; 3) ventilation with 5 acts/minute with tidal volume of 2-3 ml/Kg and a PEEP of 3-5 cmH2O during CPB. The primary end-point will be the incidence of a PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200 until the time of discharge from the ICU. The secondary end-points will be the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications and 30-days mortality. Patients will be followed-up to 12 months after the date of randomization. Summary The CPBVENT Trial will determine whether different ventilation strategies during CPB will improve pulmonary outcome in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
The use of non-invasive methods of respiratory support to reduce complications of prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation in preterm infants has increased. The most common mode is nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV). In NIMV, the interval between mechanical breaths is fixed and is determined by the frequency dialed by the clinician. Asynchrony between the infant's spontaneous breathing may exist since mechanical breaths delivered at fixed intervals can occur at different times over the inspiratory or expiratory phases of the infant's spontaneous breathing. Synchronized-NIMV is a mode similar to NIMV where the ventilator cycle is delivered in synchrony with the infant's spontaneous inspiration. This has been achieved by using techniques to detect the infant's spontaneous inspiration. The advantages or disadvantages of synchronized compared to non-synchronized NIMV remain to be determined. This study seeks to evaluate the effect of synchronized NIMV versus non-synchronized NIMV on ventilation and gas exchange in premature infants who require supplemental oxygen. The hypothesis is that the use of flow synchronized nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (S-NIMV) in comparison to non-synchronized NIMV will improve ventilation and gas exchange and reduce breathing effort. The objective of the study is to compare the effect of flow synchronized-NIMV to non-synchronized-NIMV on tidal volume (VT), minute ventilation (VE), gas exchange, breathing effort, apnea and chest wall distortion in preterm neonates with lung disease.
Respiratory failure is the main death cause in neuromuscular diseases. Non-invasive and volitional measures of inspiratory muscles strength include the nasal pressure with an occluded nostril (Psnip) and the maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax). Unfortunately, volitional maneuvers depend of patient effort. The aim of this research is to validate a non-invasive and non-volitional technique to evaluate diaphragm strength at neuromuscular diseases patients. The methodology consists to add to PImax and Psnip measures 5 phrenic nerves magnetical stimulation maneuvers (Pstim).Stimulations will be realize at 3 inspiratory pression levels (0, -1 cm H2O and -5 cm H2O).
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is associated with postoperative respiratory depression. In this study we aimed at investigating perioperative parameters that could predict the nadir of postoperative respiratory function impairment.
A prospective, non-randomized, multi-center clinical study of the Venus P-valve for the treatment of RVOT stenosis with pulmonary regurgitation after surgery of congenital heart defect.
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a cornerstone of management of acute respiratory failure, but MV per se can provoke ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), especially in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung protective ventilation strategy has been proved to prevent VILI by using low tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg of ideal body weight and limiting plateau pressure to less than 30 cmH2O. However, heavy sedation or even paralysis are frequently used to ensure the protective ventilation strategy, both of which are associated with respiratory muscles weakness. Maintaining of spontaneous breathing may decrease the need of sedative drug and improve gas exchange by promoting lung recruitment. Pressure-targeted mode is the most frequent way of delivering after 48 hours of initiating MV. Three types of pressure-controlled mode are available in intubated patients: Biphasic Intermittent Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP), Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV), and Pressure-Assist Controlled Ventilation (also called BIPAPassist). They are based on pressure regulation but have the difference in terms of synchronization between the patient and the ventilator. The different working principle of these modes may result in different breathing pattern and consequently different in tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure, which may be potentially harmful. The investigators bench study with a lung model demonstrated higher tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure with the BIPAPassist over APRV despite similar pressure settings and patient's simulated effort. However, the impact of each mode on the delivered tidal volume and the transpulmonary pressure in spontaneously breathing mechanically ventilated patients is currently unknown. Their hypothesis is that when the investigators compare the three pressure-controlled modes, the asynchronous mode (APRV) will result in more protective ventilation strategy over the two other modes (BIPAP and BIPAPassist).
The purpose of this study is to compare the measure of the CO2 obtained on the end-tidal expiratory gas (ETCO2) with the value of CO2 obtained by transcutaneous measure (PTCO2), in home-ventilated neuromuscular patients.
Pressure support (PS) is a commonly used mode of ventilation which is triggered based upon the patient's own inspiratory efforts. For the most part, pressure support is well tolerated by patients. However, because the trigger for pressure support is an inspiratory effort by the patient, and because the resulting support is constant, the ventilator response can be "out of sync" with the patient's needs. The problem of patient-ventilator asynchrony has been documented to be large in approximately one quarter of patients who require mechanical ventilation. Asynchrony is associated with increased or abnormal work of breathing (WOB) and prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation. Diagnosing asynchrony at the bedside can be challenging. Electrical activation of the diaphragm (Eadi) recording can provide clinicians with a more accurate picture of patient-ventilator synchrony and may thus result in decreased asynchrony and decreased or normalized work of breathing for the patient. The purpose of this physiologic study is to evaluate the role of protocolized pressure support ventilation (based upon Eadi) in comparison to standard pressure support ventilation.
The purpose of this study is to: - Compare PEEP level selected by individualized PEEP titration by electrical impedance tomography and PEEP level routinely used in post-operative cardiac patients with Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure; - Evaluate the agreement between the results of a rapid titration (total procedure duration = 5 min) versus an already validated slow titration (total procedure duration = 40 min) of the same patient, sequentially. Specifically, degree of collapse and degree of distention in each PEEP level, estimated by EIT; - Compare hemodynamics during the two maneuvers of PEEP titration; - Evaluate the efficacy of the selected PEEP (minimum PEEP preventing lung collapse less than 5%) to maintain stable levels of the following variables: arterial oxygenation, respiratory system compliance, and degree of collapse by EIT; - Compare these results (evolution of the three variables, along 4 hours) with the control strategy (default strategy currently used in the institution) group.