View clinical trials related to Respiratory Failure.
Filter by:Prospective, multi-centre, open labelled, 1:1randomized controlled study.
The goal of this prospective interventional crossover randomized physiological study is to investigate the reliability of Pressure Muscle Index (PMI) - as an estimation of inspiratory effort - at different levels of expiratory cycling during pressure support ventilation. PMI will be compared with the esophageal pressure swing that is considered the gold standard technique. This study aims to answer to the following questions: - which is the optimal expiratory cycling threshold where PMI better correlates with the esophageal pressure swing? - what is the optimal correlation between the occlusion pressure (Poc) estimated by an expiratory occlusion manoeuvre and P0.1 with PMI obtained at various degrees of expiratory cycling threshold? - does airway resistance - evaluated by using esophageal pressure - correlate with the estimation of airway resistance on the pressure-time waveform by a high percentage of expiratory cycling mimicking the interrupter technique?
In this study, the investigators will deploy a software-based clinical decision support tool (eCARTv5) into the electronic health record (EHR) workflow of multiple hospital wards. eCART's algorithm is designed to analyze real-time EHR data, such as vitals and laboratory results, to identify which patients are at increased risk for clinical deterioration. The algorithm specifically predicts imminent death or the need for intensive care unit (ICU) transfer. Within the eCART interface, clinical teams are then directed toward standardized guidance to determine next steps in care for elevated-risk patients. The investigators hypothesize that implementing such a tool will be associated with a decrease in ventilator utilization, length of stay, and mortality for high-risk hospitalized adults.
Intubation in the intensive care unit is a standard procedure with a high risk of adverse events such as hypoxaemia and cardiovascular instability. However, it is demonstrated that HFNO (High Flow Nasal Oxygen) for pre and perioxygenation is feasible and, in many situations, prolongs the safe apnoeic period after anaesthesia induction. Previous data of the use of HFNO during intubation of the critically ill is conflicting. With the new device Optiflow Switch, which allow its combination with NIV or tight facemask with perioxygenation, we aim to evaluate whether this could reduce intubation-related hypoxaemia and other adverse events. The general purpose of this project is to compare the addition of Optiflow Switch for pre- and perioxygenation to traditional preoxygenation using a tight-fitting mask or NIV during intubation in adult intensive care patients in a prospective before-and-after study design.
Nearly 25% of Americans die in intensive care units (ICUs). Most deaths in ICUs are expected and involve the removal of ventilator support, or palliative withdrawal of mechanical ventilation (WMV). Prior work by the Principal Investigator (PI) found that patient suffering can be common; with 30-59% of patients going through this process experiencing distress. Thus, experts and national organizations have called for evidence to inform guidelines for WMV. This research study will 1) develop and refine a Comfort Measures Only Time out (CMOT) intervention consisting of a structured time out with check-list protocol for the ICU team (nurse, physician, respiratory therapist) to improve the process of WMV. and 2) Pilot test the CMOT intervention in 4 ICUs (2 medical/2 surgical) among 40 WMV patients.
The goal of this randomized active-controlled study is to investigate the role of high velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI) in the immediate post-extubation period and compare it with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as regards to weaning success rate. The study will recruit those who have been on invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 3 days and with a high risk of weaning failure.
the study compares two non-invasive respiratory support modalities ie CPAP and High Flow nasal cannula oxygen for the treatment of severe hypoxemic respiratory failure attributed to Community acquired Pneumonia.
The study's aim is to ascertain the best approach for providing sedation and pain management for patients who have sustained trauma and are requiring respiratory support from a mechanical ventilator. The common approach to patients who need mechanical ventilation is to provide continuous drips of sedatives and pain medicine and awaken the patient once a day to check the brain functions. Another approach is to provide pain medicine and reserve sedatives for only a short duration when needed. The difference between approaches has not been studied in Trauma patients.
During mechanical ventilation (MV) hypoxemic or hyperoxemic events should be carefully monitored and a quick response should be provided by the caregiver at the bedside. Pediatric mechanical ventilation consensus conference (PEMVECC) guidelines suggest to measure SpO2 in all ventilated children and furthermore to measure partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) in moderate-to-severe disease. There were no predefined upper and lower limits for oxygenation in pediatric guidelines, however, Pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference PALICC guidelines proposed SpO2 between 92 - 97% when positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is smaller than 10 cm H2O and SpO2 of 88 - 92% when PEEP is bigger or equal to 10 cm H2O. For healthy lung, PEMVECC proposed the SpO2>95% when breathing a FiO2 of 21%. As a rule of thumb, the minimum fraction of inspired O2 (FiO2) to reach these targets should be used. A recent Meta-analyze showed that automated FiO2 adjustment provides a significant improvement of time in target saturations, reduces periods of hyperoxia, and severe hypoxia in preterm infants on positive pressure respiratory support. This study aims to compare the closed-loop FiO2 controller with conventional control of FiO2 during mechanical ventilation of pediatric patients
Rationale: Despite the lack of clear clinical protocols, High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO) is used as post-extubation respiratory support. Although HFNO seems to reduce the need for re-intubation, scepticism on its use persists as the mechanism of action in post-extubation patients remains undefined. Monitoring weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation while monitoring respiratory effort might help to determine the added value of HFNO surrounding extubation. We hypothesize that HFNO, compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT), prevents de-recruitment of the lung and reduces respiratory effort, and so provides a physiologic clarification for the reduction in the need for reintubation. Objective: Determine the physiological effect of HFNO compared to COT in the extubation phase regarding respiratory effort and lung aeration. Study design: A physiologic, randomized clinical study comparing two standard of clinical care therapies. Study population: Adult patients on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for >72 hours, who are scheduled for extubation. Intervention (if applicable): Before extubation, patients are randomized to receive COT (reference group) or HFNO as oxygenation regimen after extubation. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main outcome is the difference in change in lung respiratory muscle effort (mean ΔPES) at 24 hours post-extubation between the study groups. Secondary parameters are differences in changes in respiratory effort at 2 and 4 hours post-extubation, difference in change in lung aeration (mean ΔEELI), differences in tidal volume, Lung Ultrasound (LUS) score, dyspnea score, and respiratory and sputum parameters between patients undergoing different post-extubation oxygenation regimens.