View clinical trials related to Renal Insufficiency.
Filter by:Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent problem in the intensive care unit (ICU) affecting more than 50 % of patients. AKI is associated with several adverse outcomes, including increased mortality and increased length of ICU- and hospital stay, in particular in patients requiring Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT). Choosing the optimal time for attempting liberation from RRT is still unclear. With this study, we will describe the ability of renal ultrasound in predicting the outcome of dialysis weaning.
Open label, mechanistic, single-arm study to evaluate the natriuretic effect of 2 weeks dapagliflozin treatment in T2DM patients with impaired renal function. It will measure the average change in 24-hr sodium excretion from average Baseline to average values at Day 2 to 4 within the study group. The study will allow for an up to 6-week Screening and Run-in Period, a 2-week Treatment Period and a 5-day Follow-up Period. Patients will consume food from standardized food boxes starting on Day -6 (patients not on insulin) or Day -20 at the earliest (patients on insulin) of the study until Day 18 (inclusive). Eligible patients will receive dapagliflozin 10 mg tablets once daily for 14±1 days starting on Day 1. This will be followed by a Follow-up Period of 5 days.
A significant number of deceased donor kidneys donated for transplantation are not used and are thrown away due to lack of ways of checking their condition and function before the operation. This significantly reduces the number of potentially life saving transplants. The researchers wish to run a small pilot study to see if it is possible to improve the way transplant kidneys are assessed before transplantation by measuring how well they filter the blood, and how good their metabolism is. The researchers believe this new method will help transplant surgeons make better decisions about which kidneys to use. This pilot study will look at 10 kidneys obtained from older deceased donors. These kidneys are most at risk of being thrown away because of the condition of the donor they came from. At the hospital, these kidneys are usually put onto a machine which pumps cold preservation solution through them for a couple of hours. This time lets the transplant surgeons see how well or poorly the kidney responds to the flowing fluid. In this study the research team will do exactly the same, but also insert a small probe less than a millimetre in diameter into the kidney and the vein (draining blood pipe) and urine output to monitor a number of chemicals made by the kidney. The researchers believe that the changing levels of these chemicals will give the surgeons much more information than they have now. This probe is removed when the kidney is transplanted. Combining these levels with news of how well the patients recover after surgery will allow the research team to design a much larger study to get the right level of information to change the way surgeons choose kidneys and help more transplants happen in the future.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic of a single oral dose of JNJ-42847922 in adult participants with renal impairment compared with healthy participants with normal renal function.
This study will characterize the effect of varying degrees of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of a single oral dose of PF- 06882961 compared with participants with normal renal function.
This project has as main objective to evaluate the effects of a Mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) in the reduction of stressors, pain and quality of life of people with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD). The investigators hypothesize that this program offered during hemodialysis sessions may modify the pain profile, stressors levels and may improve the quality of life by the people in hemodialysis. This is an incipient field of research at the international level and almost nonexistent in Brazil. Evidence indicates the need for MBIs to be performed during HD sessions, adapted to the context, to facilitate patient compliance, contribute to the management of the discomfort generated during HD and promote health.
This prospective study will take place at Hotel Dieu de France hospital in Lebanon. One hundred children undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease between May 2020 and May 2021 will be included. After obtaining the informed consent of the parents, demographic and surgical information will be collected. Serum creatinine, lactic acid, urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin marker (NGAL), and oxygen (O2) saturation will be measured before the operation. A pediatric NIRS sensor will be placed on the right side below the costo-vertebral angle overlying the right kidney and continuous regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) will be recorded every 5 to 10 minutes throughout the operation until 24 hours after surgery. The children will be divided into 2 groups; 50 each. Grp 1: No clinical intervention was performed based on NIRS values. Grp 2: several maneuvers are performed such as an increase in cardiac output, temperature, hemoglobin to optimize the value of NIRS > 80%. All patients will receive standard standard care during the study period and continuous infusion of furosemide (0.5-1 mg / kg / 6 hours) within the first 24-48 hours postoperatively will be administered to all patients. Creatinine and lactic acid will be measured immediately postoperatively and then once a day until D2 and D7. The urinary NGAL marker will be dosed immediately postoperatively and then at 2h, 6h, 12h and 24h with hourly monitoring of diuresis and NIRS until 24h postoperatively.
To determine the efficacy and safety of transplanting HCV positive kidney allografts to HCV sero-negative patients who are on the waiting list.
Risk of contrast-induced kidney injury is expected to be strongly correlated with exposure time. Studies on the excretion of iodinated contrast material are few and have mostly been carried out in patients with normal renal function. Although case wise reports of persistent renograms have been published, it is not known how long contrast is retained before excretion in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2, nor which of these patients are most susceptible to contrast retention. The current observational study aims to compare contrast elimination time and % contrast excretion in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2, to matched patients (for age, sex and contrast procedure type) with eGFR 30-59 and eGFR >=60 mL/min/1.73m2.
Intravascular iodinated contrast administration has become crucial to modern medicine. Currently it is estimated that over 250 million injections are given each year worldwide during medical scans and interventions. An acute predefined increase in serum creatinine is considered an indicator of acute kidney injury (AKI). When such an acute increase in serum creatinine occurs within 5 days post-contrast in absence of another aetiology, it is assumed to be iodinated contrast administration induced acute kidney injury. For over 50 years now, acute kidney injury caused by intravascular administration of iodinated contrast material has been considered a leading cause of hospital-acquired renal failure. Contrast has been withheld in fear of kidney injury with misdiagnoses and delayed appropriate patient management as a result. Since 2018, it is now widely accepted that only patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 are at risk of renal injury after intravascular iodinated contrast material injection. However, no study to date has been able to distinguish acute kidney injury caused by iodinated contrast administration from that for which no causal link is established, and it is unsure a causal relationship exists. There are several studies, in attempts to evaluate the causal relationship between contrast exposure and nephrotoxicity, that found fluctuations in absence of contrast similar to those considered to be contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Similarly, it is unsure whether longer-term negative outcomes are inherent to the population studied or a result of contrast administration. However, most of these studies are observational and retrospective in nature. The issue with retrospective studies is that they often cannot control for confounders and therefore cannot give us causation, only association. On the other hand, prospective randomized controlled trials comparing intravascular iodinated contrast administration to no contrast are unlikely given evident ethical issues. The current prospective observational study proposes to use intra-patient comparisons of peak change in renal function during periods in absence of- and with contrast to elucidate the relationship between renal function and contrast administration in this population.