Assessment of the Impact of TIP Score on Thromboprophylaxis in Patients

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Traumatic lesions are the leading causes of admission to the emergency center (39%), isolated non-surgical lower limbs trauma are in the foreground. Two recent meta-analyzes suggest the value of Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWH) which would reduce symptomatic Thromboembolism Events (TE) in patients with lower limb trauma. However, many recent studies conclude to the need of stratifying the TE risk according to the patient and the nature of his trauma to obtain an individualized therapeutic decision.

The retrospectively established L-TRIP (cast) score allows stratification of the risk without taking into account the type of trauma. The TIP score (Trauma, Immobilization and Patient) was established by consensus of international experts via the Delphi method.

We suggest that the application of the TIP score to rationalize indications of thromboprophylaxis in patients with isolated non-surgical trauma of a lower limb should reduce the rate of anticoagulation prescription without increasing the risk of symptomatic thromboembolic complications with a direct benefit for patients and medico-economic for the society.

Clinical Trial Description

All patients admitted to the Emergency Departments for a nonsurgical isolated lower limb trauma necessitating rigid or semi-rigid immobilization, will be assessed for possible participation.

After the physicians had obtained the no-opposition of the patient, they will fill a questionnaire. This questionnaire includes the treatment chosen by the physician, the type of trauma, the type of immobilization chosen, and the patient's thromboembolic risk factors in order to calculate the TIP and L-TRIP (cast) scores retrospectively.

Phone follow-up will occur within 3 months to gather clinical event data (any signs of VTE, any bleeding events). ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03089255
Study type	Observational [Patient Registry]
Source	University Hospital, Angers
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase
Start date	April 3, 2017
Completion date	January 30, 2018

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT05050617` - Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Terminated	`NCT04558125` - Low-Dose Tenecteplase in Covid-19 Diagnosed With Pulmonary Embolism	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06017271` - Predictive Value of Epicardial Adipose Tissue for Pulmonary Embolism and Death in Patients With Lung Cancer
Completed	`NCT03915925` - Short-term Clinical Deterioration After Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Completed	`NCT02502396` - Rivaroxaban Utilization for Treatment and Prevention of Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: Experience at a Comprehensive Cancer Center
Recruiting	`NCT05171075` - A Study Comparing Abelacimab to Dalteparin in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal/Genitourinary Cancer and Associated VTE	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT04454554` - Prevalence of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Dyspnea on Exertion (PEDIS)
Completed	`NCT03173066` - Ferumoxytol as a Contrast Agent for Pulmonary Magnetic Resonance Angiography	Phase 1
Terminated	`NCT03002467` - Impact Analysis of Prognostic Stratification for Pulmonary Embolism	N/A
Completed	`NCT02611115` - Optimizing Protocols for the Individual Patient in CT Pulmonary Angiography.	N/A
Completed	`NCT02334007` - Extended Low-Molecular Weight Heparin VTE Prophylaxis in Thoracic Surgery	Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed	`NCT01975090` - The SENTRY Clinical Study	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT01357941` - Need for Antepartum Thromboprophylaxis in Pregnant Women With One Prior Episode of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)	N/A
Completed	`NCT01326507` - Prognostic Value of Heart-type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein (h-FABP) in Acute Pulmonary Embolism	N/A
Completed	`NCT00720915` - D-dimer to Select Patients With First Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism Who Can Have Anticoagulants Stopped at 3 Months	N/A
Completed	`NCT00771303` - Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy:a Multicenter Outcome Study
Completed	`NCT02476526` - Safety of Low Dose IV Contrast CT Scanning in Chronic Kidney Disease	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT00773448` - Screening for Occult Malignancy in Patients With Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism	N/A
Completed	`NCT00780767` - Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in Case of Massive Pulmonary Embolism	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT00244725` - Odiparcil For The Prevention Of Venous Thromboembolism	Phase 2

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Assessment of the Impact of TIP Score on Thromboprophylaxis in Patients With Non-surgical Lower Leg Trauma. — EvaTIP

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms