View clinical trials related to PTSD.
Filter by:This study has two components. The first component (Aim 1) is a randomized trial of a novel equine therapy intervention that was developed for research purposes. The second component (Aim 2) is an evaluation of outcomes from Veterans participating in an adaptive horsemanship program that is not conducted for research purposes.
This open-label, randomized study will assess the comparative effectiveness of two versus three active MDMA-assisted sessions in U.S. military veterans with at least moderate chronic PTSD treated in an outpatient VA treatment clinic.
Review treatment outcomes of modifications to standard delivery of CPT for PTSD that are delivered as routine care at in VA outpatient clinic.
The efficacy of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for reducing the symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) across populations including military personnel and veterans is well supported. CPT also contributes to significant and rapid reductions in suicide ideation among people diagnosed with PTSD, although available evidence suggests this effect decays over time. Studies also show that approximately 1 in 6 people who begin CPT without suicide ideation will subsequently report suicidal thoughts at some point during or soon after completing treatment. Research focused on improving CPT's effects on suicide risk is therefore warranted. The primary aim of this study is to determine if the integration of a crisis response plan (CRP)--an empirically-supported procedure for reducing suicide ideation and attempts--can lead to faster reductions in suicide ideation among acutely suicidal veterans receiving CPT and prevent the development of suicide ideation among veterans who begin CPT without suicide ideation.
Individuals with PTSD are more likely to engage in unhealthy behaviors such as tobacco use, drug use, alcohol misuse, and have high rates of morbidity/mortality. PTSD negatively impacts marriages, educational attainment, and occupational functioning. Some patients with PTSD can be successfully referred to specialty mental health clinics, but most patients with PTSD cannot engage in specialty care because of geographical, financial and cultural barriers and must be treated in primary care. However, policy makers do not know the best way to treat PTSD in primary care clinics, especially for patients who do not respond to the initial treatment choice. There are effective treatments for PTSD that are feasible to deliver in primary care. These treatments include commonly prescribed antidepressants and brief exposure-based therapies. However, because there are no head-to-head comparisons between pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in primary care settings, primary care providers do not know which treatments to recommend to their patients. In addition, despite high treatment non-response rates, very few studies have examined which treatment should be recommend next when patients do not respond well to the first, and no such studies have been conducted in primary care settings. This trial will be conducted in Federally Qualified Health Centers and VA Medical Centers, where the prevalence of both past trauma exposure and PTSD are particularly high. The investigators will enroll 700 primary care patients. The investigators propose to 1) compare outcomes among patients randomized to initially receive pharmacotherapy or brief psychotherapy, 2) compare outcomes among patients randomized to treatment sequences (i.e., switching and augmenting) for patients not responding to the initial treatment and 3) examine variation in treatment outcomes among different subgroups of patients. Telephone and web surveys will be used to assessed outcomes important to patients, like self-reported symptom burden, side-effects, health related quality of life, and recovery outcomes, at baseline, 4 and 8 months. Results will help patients and primary care providers choose which treatment to try first and which treatment to try second if the first is not effective.
This study seeks to use a group-based microfinance/internal lending model to develop social capital among people with HIV in Kenya. This will create a context to deliver validated curriculum targeting intimate partner violence, positive parenting, agriculture, small business entrepreneurship, group-interpersonal therapy, and other determinants of well-being and ART adherence among people with HIV. The primary outcomes are viral suppression, ART adherence, and common mental disorders.
Prescription of analgesic, sedative, and anxiolytic medication for children and adolescents is increasing in Western countries. In recent decades, rates have also increased in Norway, despite a relatively restrictive prescription practice. Analgesics, sedatives, and anxiolytics are among the medications most commonly prescribed to young people by general practitioners and others. Overuse of such medication adversely impacts individual and societal health, social and economic measures. For example, the risk of chronification of pain, development of addiction, and dropout from school and the workforce is high. Epidemiological research has largely failed to integrate vulnerable, young service users' perspectives in planning, interpretation and dissemination of results. This has resulted in limited identification of potential causes for the increasing exposure to prescription and overuse of analgesics and other addictive drugs among of children and adolescents, and the long-term consequences this may have for morbidity and addiction in early adulthood. Knowledge of early risk factors and plausible causal mechanisms is crucial for the development of timely and effective interventions to prevent inappropriate prescriptions in clinical practice. This prospective, longitudinal cohort study examines the use of analgesic, sedative, and anxiolytic medication among about 25,000 children throughout adolescence and young adulthood (1995 to 2020), specifically addressing changes in prescription over time, and early risk factors for the prescription of addictive drugs in adolescence and young adulthood and the subsequent development of mental health disorders.
Current practice for diagnosing and managing PTSD relies primarily on subjective clinical assessments by clinicians as well as patient self-report. An independent, objective and neuro-physiology based method for directly assessing brain function is not available, but is much needed to improve diagnosis and management of PTSD. To address this critical need, the investigators propose to test a set of novel biomarkers which are based on measures of coherent activity among the regions of cerebral cortex during sleep. In preliminary studies on EEG acquired during sleep from Veterans with PTSD alone as well as other co-morbidities, the investigators have shown that the neuromarkers were highly sensitive/specific to the presence of PTSD, and highly sensitive to the severity of symptoms in PTSD group. The overall goal of this project is to further validate these novel neurophysiology marker in retrospective and prospective studies
The unmet need for effective addiction treatment within the criminal justice system "represents a significant opportunity to intervene with a high-risk population" according to NIDA's 2016-2020 strategic plan. The plan also encourages the development and evaluation of implementation strategies that address the needs of the criminal justice system. The proposed research will be conducted as part of Dr. Zielinski's Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award (K23), which aims to: 1) advance knowledge on implementation of a gold-standard psychotherapy for trauma, Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), in the prison setting and 2) examine whether prison-delivered CPT reduces drug use, psychiatric symptoms, and recidivism compared to a control condition (a coping-focused therapy). These foci have been selected because severe trauma exposure, substance use, and justice-involvement overwhelmingly co-occur in prison populations. The three specific aims in this research are: 1) Use formative evaluation to identify factors that may influence implementation and uptake of CPT in prisons, 2) Adapt CPT for incarcerated drug users and develop a facilitation-based implementation guide to support its uptake, and 3) conduct a participant-randomized Hybrid II trial to assess effectiveness and implementation outcomes of CPT with incarcerated drug users. Participants will include people who have been incarcerated (pre- and post-release from incarceration) and prison stakeholders who will be purposively sampled based on their role in implementation of CPT and other programs. Anticipated enrollment across all three Aims is 244 adult men and women.
The goal of this study is to examine whether a brief, exposure-based treatment (Written Exposure Therapy) approach is just as effective in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) compared with a more commonly used time-intensive approach called Prolonged Exposure. One hundred and fifty Veterans diagnosed with PTSD will be randomly assigned to either Written Exposure therapy or Prolonged Exposure. Veteran participants will be assessed at pre-treatment, and 10-, 20-, and 30- weeks post first treatment session. Primary outcome measure will be PTSD symptom severity. The secondary outcome measure will be quality of life. In addition, treatment dropout during the first five sessions will be examined. WET is expected to have a lower treatment dropout rate relative to PE.