Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05500001
Other study ID # Pro00110691
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 1, 2022
Est. completion date September 1, 2025

Study information

Verified date November 2023
Source University of Alberta
Contact Melanie Robles, MD
Phone (780) 983-9773
Email maduples@ualberta.ca
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Background: A lack of education, resources, and support for family carers of young adults with psychotic illnesses leaves them ill-equipped to support their loved one. Although family support groups exist, few groups offer evidence-based, skills-focused, psychoeducation taught by certified professionals and provided on a public-health level. By equipping families with skills and knowledge, public healthcare harnesses a powerful ally to maintain community stabilization. Aims: The primary study goal is to implement a psychoeducation intervention for family carers supporting young adults with psychosis to reduce family burden and foster community stabilization of service users. Methods: A longitudinal pre-post design will be used to assess the long-term effectiveness of the psychoeducation intervention for family carers supporting a young adult with psychosis on service utilization and functional indexes. Nine expert-reviewed, and family peer-informed psychoeducation modules are administered in 2-hour sessions over 9 weeks to family carers. Conclusion: Presenting the novel approach of an expert-reviewed, peer-informed psychoeducation intervention for family carers, with a focus on knowledge and skill development, the researchers contribute to literature and best practice in patient and family-centered care.


Description:

Background: A lack of education, resources, and support for family carers of young adults with psychotic illnesses leaves them ill-equipped to support their loved one. Often family carers are excluded from the discharge planning process or are unaware of how to support of their loved one in community. Although best practice documents champion family involvement the implementation of these guidelines is challenge and families are often excluded from care.There is evidence of the disparity between best practice documents and true practice in the literature. Family inclusion also addresses the impact of psychotic disease on the family's functioning and mental health. Psychotic illness (e.g., anosognosia, paranoia) can interfere with relational health and the natural maturation of family relationships over time. Families face extreme challenges when supporting a young adult with psychotic illness including social isolation, likely because their typical social supports are unable to relate to their situation, prompting them to seek support with those who share their situation (i.e., family support groups). Family carers, even in the face of these hardships, work with great tenacity toward improving service user stability in community. There is a lack of high-quality effectiveness research showing longitudinal evidence for treatment effects on the carer and the young person in family psychoeducation groups. For example, one study provided a family intervention that was primarily knowledge- and support-based. These researchers used a pre-post design to assess the mental health knowledge, but did not assess long-term effectiveness of the group, overall family functioning, and functioning of the service user. The intent for this longitudinal pre-post study is to evaluate the effect of skills-based educational programming for family carers supporting young adults admitted to or discharged from hospital with psychosis of any etiology on 6-month and 24-month service user readmission rates and service user/family functional indexes. The investigators hypothesize that system integration of a program which delivers early support for the family carers by way of an educational intervention beginning prior to or shortly after hospital discharge may reduce family burden as well as improve short- and long-term patient outcomes. To the investigators' knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate effectiveness of a family carer skills-based education intervention within a public healthcare system. The investigators will use a longitudinal pretest-posttest design with a non-equivalent control group to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of this family psychoeducation intervention. While a control group can be used for comparison of the service utilization data for young adults with psychosis using archival data from health records, gathering long-term control group data from families not participating in the trial is unethical in that denial of an intervention for up to two years is potentially harmful to both the families and the young adult they support. Likewise, control group data gathered directly from young adult service users presents the same ethical problem. Using archival health utilization data, however, allows us to exclude any service users' whose families have elected to access the psychoeducation program within the 2-year timeframe of the study. This allows us to find control data for health service utilization while not withholding the psychoeducation intervention from those who seek it. The investigators acknowledge that the control group is non-equivalent because families and service users who chose not to engage in the study may vary systematically from those who did. Each measure will be taken pre-intervention (i.e., baseline), post-intervention, then again at 6- and 24-months post-intervention. A gift card incentive ($25.00 per data collection meeting) will be provided to family and young adult participants as a token of appreciation for their participation. Service utilization data will be collected for 12-months pre-intervention to be compared to 12-months post-intervention and 12-24 months post-intervention. Recruitment: Study information will be disseminated by clinical teams and through community organizations, and family carers meeting eligibility criteria will self-identify for participation. Once recruited, and with family consent, young adult service users of participating family carers will be contacted for recruitment into the study. Measures: A variety of measures will be used to collect functional index data for the family members and the young adult service users. Health utilization data will be mined for 12-months pre-intervention, and up to 24-months post-intervention to assess long term service user outcomes. See Outcome Measures section for details. Secondary Data Control Group: While randomization into treatment and control groups was not feasible for this study, non-equivalent control group data can be mined from health records for young adults whose family did not participate in the study. Intervention: The educational modules are developed by experts in the areas of interest and are evidence based, family peer-informed and expert peer-reviewed. The curriculum consists of 9 modules delivered weekly over 9 weeks. Evidence-based content includes the Listen-Empathize-Agree-Partner (LEAP) communication Program, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. The family psychoeducation classes are to take place at a designated AHS location. Limitations and Conclusion: The described protocol is one of the first attempts in the literature to evaluate an evidence-based intervention for carers of young adults with psychotic illness. The current study builds on others by incorporating psychoeducational elements, modules specific to the LEAP approach, and modules specific to ACT. Furthermore, the design of the study intends to gather longitudinal 24-month post-intervention data from carers and service users, including health service utilization data. Several limitations must be considered with regards to this protocol. First, using a pre-post design the investigators cannot draw causal conclusions regarding the effect of the intervention. To address this limitation the investigators will use secondary data from health records as a non-equivalent control group for health utilization data. A second limitation is that participants self-select for the study, and may differ systematically from those who choose not to participate. For example, the sample will likely be biased towards families who are already supportive and involved in their young adults' care. The sample of young adults participating will be additionally biased because those who are especially unwell may be unable to participate. By comparing the health utilization data of the participants to the nonequivalent control group in a longitudinal design the investigators will gain some evidence to rule out history effects. Even with these limitations, the described design builds on existing knowledge of effective family psychoeducation groups and their long term effects on young adults experiencing psychosis.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date September 1, 2025
Est. primary completion date September 1, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 17 Years to 27 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Young adult service user is aged 17-27 at time of recruitment - Young adult service user has had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months Exclusion Criteria: - Not proficient in English - Young adult service user has NOT had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months

Study Design


Intervention

Behavioral:
Supporting Patients by Family Education in Psychotic Illness Group
Psychoeducation for families supporting young adults with psychosis.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Alberta Hospital Edmonton Edmonton Alberta
Canada Grey Nuns Community Hospital Edmonton Alberta
Canada Royal Alexandra Hospital Edmonton Alberta
Canada University of Alberta Hospital Edmonton Alberta

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Alberta Alberta Health services, Families Supporting Adults with Mental Illness-Alberta

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (16)

Alberta Health Services. (2018). Patient and Family Centered Care Resource Kit: How to Improve the Patient Experience. Quality and Healthcare Improvement, Engagement and Patient Experience Department.

Amador X. (2020).I Am Not Sick, I Don't Need Help! How To Help Someone Accept Treatment. New York: Vida Press

American Psychological Association [APA]. (2011). Family Interventions. Retrieved on August 9, 2022 from https://www.apa.org/pi/about/publications/caregivers/practice-settings/intervention/family

Day K, Starbuck R, Petrakis M. Family group interventions in an early psychosis program: A re-evaluation of practice after 10 years of service delivery. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;63(5):433-438. doi: 10.1177/0020764017710301. Epub 2017 May 24. — View Citation

Day, K., & Petrakis, M. (2017). Family interventions in early psychosis service delivery: A systematized review. Social Work in Mental Health, 15(6): 632-650. doi:10.1080/15332985.2016.1271381

Early Psychosis Guidelines Writing Group and EPPIC National Support Program (2016). Australian Clinical Guidelines for Early Psychosis, 2nd edition update, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne.

Ewertzon M, Hanson E. Support Interventions for Family Members of Adults with Mental Illness: A Narrative Literature Review. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Sep;40(9):768-780. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2019.1591547. Epub 2019 May 30. — View Citation

Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K.D., & Wilson, K.G. (1999)Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. Guilford Press.

Jolley S, Johns LC, O'Donoghue E, Oliver J, Khondoker M, Byrne M, Butler L, De Rosa C, Leal D, McGovern J, Rasiukeviciute B, Sim F, Morris E. Group acceptance and commitment therapy for patients and caregivers in psychosis services: Feasibility of training and a preliminary randomized controlled evaluation. Br J Clin Psychol. 2020 Nov;59(4):524-551. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12265. Epub 2020 Sep 17. — View Citation

Kreyenbuhl J, Buchanan RW, Dickerson FB, Dixon LB; Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT). The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): updated treatment recommendations 2009. Schizophr Bull. 2010 Jan;36(1):94-103. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp130. Epub 2009 Dec 2. — View Citation

MacCourt, P. (2013). Family Caregivers Advisory Committee, Mental Health Commission of Canada. National Guidelines for a Comprehensive Service System to Support Family Caregivers of Adults with Mental Health Problems and Illnesses. Calgary, AB: Mental Health Commission of Canada. Retrieved from: http://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca

McFarlane WR, Dixon L, Lukens E, Lucksted A. Family psychoeducation and schizophrenia: a review of the literature. J Marital Fam Ther. 2003 Apr;29(2):223-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01202.x. — View Citation

Poon, A.W.C., Curtis, J., Howard, A., Ward, P.B., & Lappin, J.M. (2019). Health of Carers of Young People with Early Psychosis: A Biopsychosocial Approach. Australian Social Work, 72(3): 260-273, DOI: 10.1080/0312407X.2018.1530269

Rachamim L, Nacasch N, Sinay I. Complicated Grief, Depression, Health and Attachment Style in First Degree Relatives of Individuals with a Chronic Psychotic Disorders. Community Ment Health J. 2022 Apr;58(3):526-535. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00848-z. Epub 2021 Jun 16. — View Citation

Rosas-Santiago, F.J., Genchi, J.J., Heredia, I.S., & Zamora, V.E.R. (2022). Psychoeducation and group acceptance and commitment therapy as psychological support strategies for informal caregivers of patients with a first psychotic episode: An experimental study. Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches.[Preprint]. doi:10.1080/17522439.2022.2061041.

World Health Organization. (2013). Mental health action plan 2013-2020. World Health Organization Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506021

* Note: There are 16 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Family Burden Interview Schedule assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health Baseline-Day 0 (Pre-intervention)
Primary Family Burden Interview Schedule assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health 9-Week Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Primary Family Burden Interview Schedule assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health 6-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Primary Family Burden Interview Schedule assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health 24-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Primary Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control) Baseline-Day 0 (Pre-intervention)
Primary Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control) 9-Week Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Primary Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control) 6-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Primary Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control) 24-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Primary Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items. Baseline-Day 0 (Pre-intervention)
Primary Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items. 9-Week Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Primary Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items. 6-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Primary Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items. 24-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Secondary Inpatient Readmission Rate Readmission rate for mental health diagnosis within 30 days of an inpatient discharge 12-24 months post-intervention
Secondary Inpatient Readmission Rate Readmission rate for mental health diagnosis within 30 days of an inpatient discharge 12-months pre-intervention
Secondary Inpatient Readmission Rate Readmission rate for mental health diagnosis within 30 days of an inpatient discharge 12-months post-intervention
Secondary Inpatient Admission Frequency Frequency of hospital admissions for mental health diagnosis 12-months pre-intervention
Secondary Inpatient Admission Frequency Frequency of hospital admissions for mental health diagnosis 12-months post-intervention
Secondary Inpatient Admission Frequency Frequency of hospital admissions for mental health diagnosis 12-24 months post-intervention
Secondary Emergency Department Visit Frequency Frequency of emergency departments visits within 30 days of last emergency presentation 12-months pre-intervention
Secondary Emergency Department Visit Frequency Frequency of emergency departments visits within 30 days of last emergency presentation 12-months post-intervention
Secondary Emergency Department Visit Frequency Frequency of emergency departments visits within 30 days of last emergency presentation 12-24 months post-intervention
Secondary Community Appointment Frequency Appointment frequency for community-based services 12-months pre-intervention
Secondary Community Appointment Frequency Appointment frequency for community-based services 12-months post-intervention
Secondary Community Appointment Frequency Appointment frequency for community-based services 12-24 months post-intervention
Secondary Crisis Service Frequency Frequency of crisis calls and visits 12-months pre-intervention
Secondary Crisis Service Frequency Frequency of crisis calls and visits 12-months post-intervention
Secondary Crisis Service Frequency Frequency of crisis calls and visits 12-24 months post-intervention
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05321602 - Study to Evaluate the PK Profiles of LY03010 in Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder Phase 1
Terminated NCT03230097 - This Study Tests Whether BI 409306 Prevents Patients With a Specific Type of Mental Illness (Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome) From Becoming Worse. This Study Looks at How Well Patients Tolerate the Medicine and How Effective it is Over 1 Year Phase 2
Completed NCT03497663 - VIA Family - Family Based Early Intervention Versus Treatment as Usual N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05726617 - Avatar Intervention for the Treatment of Cannabis Use Disorder in Patients With Severe Mental Health Disorders N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03807388 - ReMindCare App for Patients From First Episode of Psychosis Unit. N/A
Recruiting NCT02874573 - Tocilizumab in Schizophrenia Phase 1
Terminated NCT02584114 - Brain Effects of Memory Training in Early Psychosis N/A
Completed NCT02906553 - The Role of Nitric Oxide in Cognition in Schizophrenia N/A
Withdrawn NCT02213887 - Study of the Effects of Pantoprazole on Levels of Prescribed Psychiatric Medications Phase 4
Terminated NCT02841956 - Reducing Duration of Untreated Psychosis Through Rapid Identification and Engagement N/A
Completed NCT01981356 - Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for the Inpatient Treatment of Psychosis Phase 0
Recruiting NCT02848469 - Irish Omega-3 Study Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02009969 - Serial Comparisons of Abdominal and Neurological MRI Scans N/A
Completed NCT02648321 - Motivational Intervention for Physical Activity in Psychosis N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT00762866 - Psychiatric Genotype/Phenotype Project Repository
Completed NCT00484302 - Specialized Addiction Treatment Versus Treatment as Usual for Young Patients With Cannabis Abuse and Psychosis N/A
Completed NCT00130923 - Risperidone Long-acting Versus Oral Risperidone in Patients With Schizophrenia and Alcohol Use Disorder Phase 4
Completed NCT00455234 - Rapid Tranquillization Trial: TREC-India II Phase 3
Completed NCT00844922 - Safety of Org 34517 900 mg in Patients Who Received Org 34517 in a Previous Trial (Study 28133/P05842) Phase 2
Completed NCT00226278 - Safety Study of ORG 34517 for Major Depression With Psychotic Features Phase 2