View clinical trials related to Psychotic Disorders.
Filter by:This study compares the efficacy and effectiveness of two of the second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) most used in our society in the treatment of schizophrenia (Aripiprazole and Risperidone) and the investigators do within an assistance program of early-stage psychosis individuals of the Community of Cantabria, clinical reference for the treatment of this disease in the Spanish Autonomous Community. Patients are included in a prospective naturalistic study, open flexible-doses and randomized into one of two possible patterns of treatment that includes the protocol.
This open-label, non-randomized, prospective study will evaluate the risk of symptoms recurrence during the ten years after antipsychotic discontinuation in a sample of functionally recovered first-episode patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder.
Schizophrenia has very significant economic consequences. Costs fall on many different parts of society, especially on individuals with schizophrenia and their families. The first five years after onset appears to be a critical period in which the symptoms are more responsive to treatment. In addition, if left untreated for a long time, psychosis can impact many areas of a person's life. The evidence base regarding the effectiveness of specialist early intervention services for psychosis has grown steadily and evidence from randomized controlled trials in Denmark, the United Kingdom and Spain has demonstrated the superiority of specialized early intervention programs over standard care on a broad range of outcomes including symptomatic and vocational, social functioning, and reduced inpatient care and treatment dropout, as measured over follow-up intervals of 2-3 years. Information about the cost-effectiveness of early intervention programs for first-episode psychosis is limited. The provision of such services requires investment by health departments and services, and the question of whether such services represent value for money has to date received little research attention. Only a few international studies, and none conducted in Spain, have investigated the cost effectiveness of early intervention in psychotic disorders at medium (3 years) and long-term (up to 10 years). In this study, the investigators aimed to analyse the cost-effectiveness of an intensive early-intervention programme, using data from First Episode Psychosis Clinical Program (PAFIP), the largest trial treating first episode non-affective psychosis in Spain to date.
This study compares the efficacy and effectiveness of two of the second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) most used in our society in the treatment of schizophrenia (Aripiprazole and Risperidone) and the investigators do within an assistance program of early-stage psychosis individuals of the Community of Cantabria, clinical reference for the treatment of this disease in the Spanish Autonomous Community. Patients are included in a prospective naturalistic study, open flexible-doses and randomized into one of two possible patterns of treatment that includes the protocol.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of genetic testing on healthcare decisions and patient outcomes for patients suffering from pain, cardiovascular problems, Arthritis, Type II Diabetes, and/or Mental Health disorders. Results of genetic testing will also be compared with the clinical outcome measures collected to discover novel genetic factors that may influence patient care.
Schizophrenia is a chronic brain disease that is still understood as a condition that limits the development of a normal life for the patient who suffers it and their families. The idea that only one third of patients have a good outcome is still in force, despite the lack of clinical and epidemiological longitudinal studies that have addressed this issue rigorously. Most studies that have established the poor prognosis of the disease have followed a cross-sectional design and are based on samples of patients undergoing treatment in healthcare devices and therefore represents an important bias. Based on clinical, cognitive, functional outcome and biomarkers studies (brain imaging) to medium term (3 years) we can establish that the particular idea of poor prognosis should be reconsidered. The development of longitudinal studies of first-episode patients in representative samples of a population and long-term it is of high value to shed light on the clinical course of the disease. The belief that there are factors determining the disease progression beyond the initial three years brings us to publish this study. Given this background, our project's main objective is to know the evolution at 10 years of patients followed in the First Episode Psychosis Clinical Program (PAFIP). Our hypothesis is that a higher percentage of expected patients have a favorable outcome of the disease. Factors such as enhancing treatment completion, abstinence from drug use, return to work, the reduction of expressed emotion in families during the early years of the disease (at least 3 years of intensive intervention PAFIP) will have a positive impact on the evolution of patients on long-term (10 years). Our hypothesis defends the existence of certain factors as independent risk factors for poor clinical and functional outcome of patients who should be known for establishing intervention strategies that attempt to mitigate their impact on the quality of life of patients and their families.
1. Study rationale - Nielsen et al reported that after 6 weeks of amisulpride treatment, patients with schizophrenia showed an increase in the anticipation-related functional MRI signal. This suggested that amisulpride could affect the brain structures and that responses to amisulpride could be associated by the brain structures as seen previous studies about treatment response to antipsychotics and brain structures. But to date, no study has examined the impact of brain structure alterations on amisulpride treatment for schizophrenia and its potential clinical significance. 2. Study Objectives 2-1. Primary: To show the differences of the baseline brain structures on the structural MRI between the Solian® treatment responders and the non-responders 2-2. Secondary: To show the differences of the baseline polymorphisms of COMT and BDNF with molecular genetic analysis between the Solian® treatment responders and the non-responders responder defined by PANSS. To find out the correlates of baseline brain structures with symptom severity of schizophrenia at baseline; symptom severity defined by CGI-S and PANSS. To assess psychotic symptom improvement after 8th week of Solian® treatment using PANSS, SANS, SAPS and CGI. To assess safety after 8th week of Solian® treatment with Barnes Akathisia Scale, Simpson-Angus scale and vital signs. To report all serious adverse event within 24hrs regardless of relationship to investigational product. 3. Study Design: Prospective/ Open label/ Interventional/ Controlled 4. Evaluation Criteria: 5-1. Primary endpoints: Brain structures on the structural MRI will be observed before the treatment starts. Based on the clinical response after treatment, patients will be divided in the two different groups as follow and their baseline brain structure of will be compared. Treatment responders and non-responders. 5-2. Secondary endpoints: The relationship of baseline brain structures with symptom severity of schizophrenia. Severity will be determined by CGI-S and PANSS at baseline. The differences of the polymorphisms of COMT and BDNF with molecular genetic analysis using patients' peripheral blood, especially leukocytes, between the treatment responders and the non-responders. Efficacy - PANSS, SANS, SAPS, CGI. Safety - Barnes akathisia scale, Simpson-Angus scale, Vital signs
Schizophrenia (SZ) and schizoaffective (SA) disorders are comprised of several debilitating symptoms. It was suggested that compounds with neuroprotective effects might be useful in the management of SZ/SA symptoms. Our previous clinical trials indicated significant beneficial effects for augmentations with two different neuroprotective agents: Pregnenolone and L-Theanine. Pregnenolone (PREG) is a neurosteroid, which displays multiple effects on the central nervous system. Our recent 8-week, randomized, double-blind trial among patients with chronic SZ/SA disorders, in which PREG versus placebo and DHEA was added to antipsychotics, yielded encouraging results: PREG augmentation demonstrated significant amelioration of positive symptoms, EPS, as well as an improvement in attention, and working memory performance of SZ/SA disorder patients (Ritsner et al 2010). L-Theanine is a unique amino acid present almost exclusively in the tea plant. It possesses neuroprotective, mood-enhancing, and relaxation activities. L-theanine augmentation to antipsychotic therapy can ameliorate positive, activation, and anxiety symptoms in SZ/SA disorder patients (grant # 06TGF-911, (Ritsner et al 2010). This proposed study would extend our prior research with Pregnenolone and L-theanine by combining both agents versus placebo. We hypothesized that addition of both these compounds to ongoing antipsychotics would significantly improve the clinical status of SZ/SA patients. Methods: In an 8-week, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial a combination of PREG (50 mg/day) with L-theanine (400 mg/day) versus placebo will be added to the stable ongoing antipsychotic treatment of 200 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders. This trial will be conducted at five sites in Israel. Participants will be assessed at baseline and after 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks of treatment. A battery of research instruments will be used for the assessment of psychopathology, side effects, general functioning and quality of life
It is the goal of this study adherence and quality of life in a population of people suffering from schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and to analyze if these factors are influenced by treatment, support, social services, and residential treatment. The study population is drawn from the the cantons Glarus and Graubunden as well as Liechtenstein.
Antipsychotic medications frequently cause metabolic side-effects, such as abdominal obesity, high blood pressure, cholesterol abnormalities, and blood sugar dysregulation, all of which can lead to what is known as the Metabolic Syndrome and serious long-term cardiovascular health problems. Therefore, it is important that metabolic issues be addressed as part of a holistic approach to the mental health treatment of these patients. As with the general population, improving metabolic health involves lifestyle changes - i.e., addressing daily habits regarding eating, physical exercise, stress and sleep management, and lifestyle habits such as smoking. However, there is growing recognition in the medical field that education is not enough for people to create meaningful and sustained lifestyle change. The emerging field of Integrative Health Coaching addresses this issue and provides a clinical framework for helping people successfully develop and achieve personalized lifestyle goals. The investigators have therefore decided to investigate whether health coaching techniques may have benefit in addressing metabolic health issues in people with psychosis disorders. The intent is to complement usual psychiatric and medical care, and also promote patient engagement in managing one's overall health. This study will investigate whether Integrative Health Coaching is a useful clinical tool to facilitate healthy lifestyle behaviour and thereby improve metabolic health in people with psychosis disorders.